100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

November 05, 1978 - Image 5

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Citizen, 1978-11-05

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

I.
, .
.
I.
I
I
\
.
t I
.' I
..
� , Ion as

you eentinu
OJ
to vot. ,
\
th poli!ician
ill ,continu
to ignore you !
I.
. I
. . The folio
� the q tions
to decide upon ile YOti
I
I
PROPOSAl RELATI
S II a con nlion of elected detelates
be su itted to
.'
..
-
8:
Restricted Parole
H:
The Voucher Plan
: T anspofta .
Yes
Yes
Yes
I
c:
In
nt of Pu
J:
The Tisch Proposal
R:
ilf
".
Yes
Yes
Yes
r
D: T
l.epl Orin . n
",
Yes

, b
theE
, .
YES 0 NO 0
I I ,
"ntum�1S For: Some say our Constitutio has become o'utdated since its enactment In 1963. Our present CQnstrtution m nda es
acceptance or rejection of a consbtutional con ention every 16 years. . I
Arpmen Api t: The -1963 Constitution IS young. The previous Constitution as ratified in 1908. mending it is be '
S 10 million convention hich may ell stri e such provIsions as those prohlbttin deficit spending and a gradua IncO
may nUllify any tax Jlmlt or property tax shi ap roved at thIS elecbon. I
' ..
p
tB
The proposed fa o,uld: \
1. list the cnmes to tuch this la applres, tnch are crimes 0 violence or cnmes resultmg In injury to persons or damage
property.
2 Prohibit th Parole Board from granting a parole to a prisoner serving a sentence for con iction 0 0 0 these Cl mes un .
after the completion of th minimum sentence imposed on the prisoner.
3. Provide th t in cases involving conncncn for one of these cri that the mintmum sentence cannot be di
granbng of ROOd time, special good time or special paf . . f :
Should thIS proposed II be dopled?
IT THE DEPOSIT OF ST TE FU
YES 0 0
arlUe th certainty of Penalty
ts say exis' penal illK1l'�M
in savin nd
associl
and ered' un-
ruo
'1
, .
PROPOSAl TO PROHIBIT CO IC BEVEMAGES ,FROM BEl
CONSU PTiO BY, A PERSON U DER TtiE AGE OF 21.
The proposed amendment ould:
1. Define an alco elic t»e era . ,.
2. Pr0111btt sale or iVlOg of 'an coholic be er ge to a person under the age of 2l.
,
3. Prohlbtt the po��ion for personal consumption of an alcohofc be era by a person u
I •
S Id thO a ndment be ?
.:
of 21. /
, I.
cOnauctof
under 21. Cited ruta'
.
s,
1VI..,.n·1S "ptnlt: Opponents argue It IS InconSIS entto ti e a" y a sm ' n hUnd I t 18- to 21-year
and responslbllltJes of adu ood. Opponents as h can one be parti an adult and parti I a ju ni ?
Continued on h
_ ..
G: S ate Police CollectIve Bargaining
Yes __ ",,-
: urm d Bait
ys _

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan