JANUARY 11 • 2024 | 47 meaning, I was not recognized by them in My attribute of ‘keeping faith,’ by reason of which My name is ‘Hashem,’ namely that I am faithful to fulfil My word, for I made promises to them but I did not fulfil them [during their lifetime].” Rashi commentary to Exodus 6:3. The patriarchs had received promises from God. They would multiply and become a nation. They would inherit a land. Neither of these prom- ises were realized in their lifetime. To the contrary, as Genesis reaches its close, the family of the patriarchs num- bered a mere 70 souls. They had not yet acquired a land. They were in exile in Egypt. But now the fulfilment was about to begin. Already, in the first chapter of Exodus, we hear, for the first time, the phrase Am Bnei Yisrael, “the people of the chil- dren of Israel” (Exodus 1:9). Israel was no longer a family, but a people. Moses at the burning bush was told by God that He was about to bring the people to “a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey” (Exodus 3:8). Hashem therefore means the God who acts in history to fulfill His promises. This was something radical- ly new — not just to Israel but to humanity as a whole. Until then, God (or the gods) was known through nature. God was in the sun, the stars, the rain, the storm, the fertility of the fields and the sequence of the seasons. When there was drought and famine, the gods were being angry. When there was produce in plenty, the gods were showing favor. The gods were nature personified. Never before had God inter- vened in history, to rescue a people from slavery and set them on the path to freedom. This was a revolution, at once political and intellectual. THE VALUE OF HISTORY To most humans at most times, there seems to be no meaning in history. We live, we die, and it is as if we had never been. The universe gives no sign of any interest in our existence. If that was so in ancient times, when people believed in the exis- tence of gods, how much more so is it true today for the neo-Darwinians who see life as no more than the operation of “chance and necessity” (Jacques Monod) or “the blind watchmaker” (Richard Dawkins). Time seems to obliterate all mean- ing. Nothing lasts. Nothing endures. In ancient Israel, by con- trast, “for the first time, the prophets placed a value on history … For the first time, we find affirmed and increas- ingly accepted the idea that historical events have a value in themselves, insofar as they are determined by the will of God … Historical facts thus become situations of man in respect to God, and as such they acquire a religious value that nothing had previously been able to confer on them. It may, then, be said with truth that the Hebrews were the first to discover the mean- ing of history as the epiphany of God. Judaism is humanity’s first glimpse of history as more than a mere succession of happenings — as nothing less than a drama of redemption in which the fate of a nation reflects its loyalty or otherwise to a covenant with God. It is hard to recapture this turning point in the human imagination, just as it is hard for us to imagine what it was like for people first to encoun- ter Copernicus’ discovery that the Earth went round the sun. It must have been a terrifying threat to all who believed that the Earth did not move; that it was the one stable point in a shifting universe. So it was with time. The ancients believed that nothing really changed. Time was, in Plato’s phrase, no more than the “moving image of eternity.” That was the certainty that gave people solace. The times may be out of joint, but even- tually things will return to the way they were. To think of history as an arena of change is terrifying. It means what happened once may never happen again; that we are embarked on a journey with no assurance we will ever return to where we began. It is what Milan Kundera meant in his phrase, “the unbearable lightness of being.” Only pro- found faith — a new kind of faith, breaking with the entire world of ancient mythology — could give people the courage to set out on a journey to the unknown. That is the meaning of Hashem: the God who intervenes in history. As Judah Halevi points out, the Ten Commandments begin not with the words “I am the Lord your God who cre- ated heaven and earth,” but “I am the Lord your God who brought you out from Egypt, from the house of slavery.” Elokim is God as we encounter Him in nature and creation, but Ha-shem is God as revealed in history, in the liberation of the Israelites from slavery and Egypt. I find it moving that this is precisely what many non-Jewish observers have concluded. This, for example, is the verdict of the Russian thinker Nikolai Berdyaev: “I remember how the materialist interpretation of history, when I attempted in my youth to verify it by applying it to the destinies of peoples, broke down in the case of the Jews, where destiny seemed abso- lutely inexplicable from the materialistic standpoint … Its survival is a mysterious and wonderful phenomenon demonstrating that the life of this people is governed by a special predetermination, transcending the processes of adaptation expounded by the materialistic interpretation of history. “The survival of the Jews, their resistance to destruction, their endurance under abso- lutely peculiar conditions and the fateful role played by them in history: All these point to the particular and mysterious foundations of their destiny.” Nicolai Berdyaev, The Meaning of History (1936), 86–87 That is what God tells Moses is about to be revealed: Hashem, mean- ing God as He intervenes in the arena of time, “so that My name may be declared throughout the world” (Exodus 9:16). The script of history would bear the mark of a hand not human, but Divine. And it began with these words: “Therefore say to the Israelites: I am Hashem, and I will bring you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians.” The late Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks served as the chief rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth, 1991-2013. His teachings have been made available to all at rabbisacks.org.