T he Israelites were at their lowest ebb. They had been enslaved. A decree had been issued that every male child was to be killed. Moses had been sent to liberate them, but the first effect of his intervention was to make matters worse, not bet- ter. Their quota of brickmak- ing remained unchanged, but now they also had to provide their own straw. Initially, they had believed Moses when he performed the signs God had given him and told them that God was about to rescue them. Now they turned against Moses and Aaron, accusing them: “May the Lord look upon you and judge you! You have made us a stench to Pharaoh and his officials and have put a sword in their hand to kill us.” Exodus 5:20–21 At this point Moses — who had been so reluctant to take on the mission — turned to God in protest and anguish: “O Lord, why have You brought trouble upon this people? Is this why You sent me? Ever since I went to Pharaoh to speak in Your name, he has brought trouble upon this people, and You have not rescued Your people at all.” Exodus 5:22 None of this, however, was accidental. The Torah is preparing the ground for one of its most monumental propositions: In the darkest night, Israel was about to have its greatest encounter with God. Hope was to be born at the very edge of the abyss of despair. There was nothing natural about this, nothing inevitable. No logic can give rise to hope; no law of history charts a path from slavery to redemption. The entire sequence of events was a prelude to the single most formative moment in the history of Israel: the intervention of God in his- tory — the supreme Power intervening on behalf of the supremely powerless, not (as in every other culture) to endorse the status quo, but to overturn it. God tells Moses: “I am Hashem, and I will bring you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians. I will free you from being slaves to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with mighty acts of judg- ment. I will take you as My own people, and I will be your God” (Exodus 6:6-7). The entire speech is full of interest, but what will con- cern us — as it has successive generations of interpreters — is what God tells Moses at the outset: “I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty [E-l Shaddai], but by My name Hashem I was not known to them” (Exodus 6:3). A fundamental distinction is being made between the experience the patriarchs had of God, and the experience the Israelites were about to have. Something new, unprec- edented, was about to happen. What is it? Clearly it had to do with the names by which God is known. The verse distinguish- es between E-l Shaddai (“God Almighty”) and the four- letter name of God which, because of its sanctity, Jewish tradition refers to simply as Hashem — “the name” par excellence. WHAT’S NEW ABOUT ‘HASHEM?’ As the classic Jewish com- mentators point out, the verse must be read with great care. It does not say that the patriarchs “did not know” this name; nor does it say that God did not “make this name known” to them. The name Hashem appears no less than 165 times in the book of Genesis. God Himself uses the phrase “I am Hashem” to both Abraham (Genesis 15:7) and Jacob (28:13). What, then, is new about the revelation of God that was about to happen in the days of Moses that had never happened before? The Sages give var- ious explanations. A Midrash says that God is known as Elokim when He judges human beings, E-l Shaddai when He suspends judgment and Hashem when He shows mercy. Judah Halevi in The Kuzari, and Ramban in his Commentary, say that Hashem refers to God when He performs miracles that suspend the laws of nature. However, Rashi’s explanation is the simplest and most elegant: “It is not written here, [My name, Hashem] I did not make known to them’ but rather ‘[By the name, Hashem] I was not known to them’ — Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks The God Who Acts in History SPIRIT A WORD OF TORAH Burning Bush. Seventeenth- century painting by Sébastien Bourdon in the Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg 46 | JANUARY 11 • 2024