100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

June 22, 2023 - Image 27

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Detroit Jewish News, 2023-06-22

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

JUNE 22 • 2023 | 33

SPIRIT

Meritocracy
vs. Elitism
K

orach is not only a story
about rebellion; for
present-day readers in
particular, the story is also about
the complicated relationship
between the Jewish ideal of cho-
senness and an exaggerat-
ed sense of entitlement.
At the heart of Korach’s
dissent is what he claims
to be the unfair selection
of Moses and Aaron to
unique positions of prom-
inence and authority.
“You have gone too far,

Korach protests to Moses
and Aaron, “The entire
congregation of Israel,
they are holy with God in
their midst; why then do
you raise yourselves above
God’s people?”
At first glance, his claim
seems to be a reasonable chal-
lenge to established leadership.
Korach purports to be a pop-
ulist protestor, speaking in the
name of rank-and-file Israelites
against the usurping of political
and theological leadership and
power by a single elite family.
Korach is apparently not
aware that the heart and soul
of God’s relationship with the
Children of Israel has been
elevating divinely chosen indi-
viduals Abraham, Isaac, Jacob,
Joseph, Judah, and finally Moses
and Aaron to the very sort of
prominence that Korach now
challenges. He fails to recognize
a central pillar of meritocracy:
Not everyone is equally suited to
do everything, and so not every-
one gets to do whatever they feel
they deserve.
Korach is not interested in
elevating the entire people of
Israel to the level of Moses and
Aaron, but only himself. As

much as Korach tries to mask a
sense of entitlement by speaking
in populist terms “we are all
holy,
” the claim of elitism that
he slings at Moses and Aaron is
driven by selfish aims. He is the
proverbial elitist who feels
entitled to replace those
he decries as entitled
elitists.
As ignoble as Korach’s
self-serving claims are,
even more cringe-worthy
is the fact that others
bought what he was
peddling and followed
him, due in no small
part to Korach stoking
the fear and uncertainty
born of the precarious-
ness of the moment. As
Nachmanides explained, Korach
put up with the high office filled
by Aaron and Moses’ accolades
until, following a series of cri-
ses that included the death of
Miriam, the catastrophe of the
spies, and the punishment of 40
additional years of wandering
he found opportunity to start
his mutiny, hence his reference
to Moses bringing the people to
die in the wilderness.
Korach’s self-serving, manip-
ulative campaign for leadership
is the polar opposite of Moses’
humility. Moses refuses leader-
ship even when offered by God;
Korach demands it even when
no one else thought he was wor-
thy of it. His was truly the quint-
essential dispute that was not for
the sake of heaven but only for
the sake of one man with a trag-
ically exaggerated self-image.

Dr. Howard N. Lupovitch is an

associate professor of history at Wayne

State University and director of WSU’s

Cohn-Haddow Center for Judaic

Studies.

TORAH PORTION

Howard
Lupovitch

Parshat

Korach:

Numbers 16:1-

18:32;

I Samuel

11:14-12:22.

Grand Opening
Specials!

optiquedetroit.com

6315 Haggerty Road, West Bloomfield | 248.863.9696
41840 Ford Road, Canton | 734.981.1760

We Are Now Back in
West Bloomfield.

Accepting most insurance
plans and HSA.
Call to schedule your eye exam
248-863-9696

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan