100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

November 18, 2021 - Image 25

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Detroit Jewish News, 2021-11-18

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

NOVEMBER 18 • 2021 | 25

refusing to provide or
destroying evidence. The
defendants claim they were
exercising their free speech
rights and that they did
not coordinate and plan
the violence that weekend,
which they attributed mainly
to counter-protesters and
Antifa, as well as inaction
by the Charlottesville police.
Several defendants claimed
that they had little or no
contact among each other,

but cell phone
records and texts
accepted as evi-
dence showed
otherwise.
While a civil
lawsuit does
not require
“proof beyond
a reasonable
doubt,” it does require a
“preponderance of evi-
dence,” according to Steven
Winter, Walter S. Gibbs

Distinguished Professor of
Constitutional Law at Wayne
State University Law School.
Winter says the plaintiffs’
lawyers must show that
the defendants intended to
deprive the plaintiffs of their
Constitutional rights, par-
ticipated in a conspiracy for
that purpose and injured the
plaintiffs.
There is a huge volume
of evidence for the case —
much of it digital — cell

phone call records, texts,
internet posts and videos
from the weeks before as
well as during the weekend
of Unite the Right, in addi-
tion to some comments from
defendants about their satis-
faction with the outcome.
Winter says this evidence
will be evaluated in terms
of context and substance.
Racist and antisemitic com-
ments, whether made at
a rally or online, are not
by themselves necessarily
crimes; the First Amendment
protects free speech. He
anticipates that regardless of
the jury’s verdict, there will
be an appeal — first to the
Court of Appeals and then
potentially to the Supreme
Court.
The trial is expected to
last up to two more weeks.
For additional information,
visit integrityfirstforamerica.
org.

Prof. Deborah Lipstadt described how
white Supremacists and neo-Nazis have
developed code words to avoid having
their online posts removed by social
media filters. Here are several examples:
• HH or 88 may substitute for Heil
Hitler. (H is the 8th letter in the alphabet.)
• Kayak — a boat — may be used
instead of kike.
• The “14 words” refers to the white
supremacist slogan: “We must secure the
existence of white people and a future
for white children.”

Professor
Steven
Winter

Supported through the generosity of The Jewish Fund and the D. Dan and Betty Kahn Family Foundation.




Need help
taking care
of a parent?

☐ Call jhelp at 1-833-445-4357

☐ Visit jhelp.org

☐ Chat online with a staff
member or schedule a

call at jhelp.org

☐ Do all of the above
X

Q

We Have Answers.

Back to Top