views essay letters Murdered: 2 Jews, 1 Arab Palestinian terror at Har Adar a stunning blow to peace. I sraeli Arabs aren’t prime inclination toward terror. His targets of Palestinian terror- wife recently fled to Jordan, ists taking aim at the Jewish accusing him of domestic vio- state. But Israel’s 1.8 million lence. She left him with their Arabs can’t always avoid those four children, according to Shin sight lines. Bet, Israel’s security agency. Israeli Arab Youssef Ottman, In a Facebook post, Jamal 25, a civilian security guard, asked his wife to forgive him Robert Sklar was one of three Israelis killed and to care for their children. He Contributing Editor by a terrorist at an entrance to wrote that he understood the Har Adar, a Jewish suburb of gravity of what he was about to Jerusalem along the Green Line, do, noting it was unrelated to the pre-1967 divide between their failed marriage, according Israel and the West Bank. to news reports. Ottman lived in Abu Ghosh, an Israeli Arab UNLIKELY TWIST town with historically What makes the shooting unusual is that warm ties to Jews and Ottman not only was honorably serving Zionism. He previously a Jewish community, but also was from had served with the Abu Ghosh, which last year the Israeli Israeli Border Police, newspaper Times of Israel described as earning plaudits for his having “uniquely friendly relations with service. the majority Jewish population in its sur- Youssef Ottman Ottman was mur- roundings.” dered along with two Most likely, the shooter didn’t know Jews: civilian security where Ottman was from or even that he guard Or Arish, 25, of was Arab. By chance, however, the shoot- Har Adar, and Border er took down not only two Jews, but also Police officer Solomon an Arab from a town radiating a glimmer Gavriya, 20, of Beer of coexistence despite being home to a Yaakov, whose family is cultural center named for Yasser Arafat. from Ethiopia. The Har The late Palestinian leader made ter- Adar security coordi- rorism a cornerstone of his search for Or Arish nator, Amit Steinhart, Palestinian statehood. 33, was seriously It wouldn’t be a stretch to argue that wounded. the three people who Jamal killed were Heroes all, they victimized by Palestinian Authority exemplified coexis- incitement against anything Israel. The tence between Israeli P.A. governs Palestinian-controlled areas Arabs and Jews, a path of the West Bank — territory economi- also sharply evident cally depressed with severe shortages of in Michigan Jewry’s water, power and infrastructure. partnership region in Most ordinary Palestinians aren’t driv- Solomon Gavriya Israel’s Central Galilee. en to commit terror, but there’s no doubt: News reports Systematic incitement has persuaded identified the Har generations of Arabs to believe Israel, Adar shooter as Nimr “the Zionist enemy,” is responsible for Mahmoud Ahmed their plight. Indoctrination takes many Jamal, 37, a father of forms, but commonly manifests itself in four from the West textbooks, music videos, sermons, news Bank Arab village of items, sports tournaments, summer Beit Surik. He had a camps, social networks, public buildings legal Israeli permit to and sites named for terrorists, and sti- The shooter, Nimr work in West Bank pends to terrorists and their families. Mahmoud Ahmed settlements. The deduction could be made that Jamal Jamal was approach- Jamal was seeking “martyrdom for ing Har Adar with Allah,” a pillar of P.A. indoctrination. P.A. other Palestinian workers when Border leadership blames any pitfall not on its Police officers, suspicious of his jacket corruption, culture of hate and aversion given September’s heat, asked him to to negotiating, but on Israeli settlements, stop. He proceeded to pull out a gun and which lie on disputed land with strong historic ties to the Jewish people; on open fire before being shot and killed. Israel’s military presence in the West Before the Sept. 26 attack, 200 Bank, in truth a defensive “occupation” Palestinians had permits to work at Har against Palestinian terror; and on Israel’s Adar. sea and land blockade of the Gaza The attack shocked Har Adar resi- Strip, ruled by the terrorist organization dents, who had grown to trust Jamal, Hamas. unaware of his troubled home life and In condemning the attack at Har Adar, the U.S. Embassy in Israel singled out how the P.A. glorifies terrorists. THE AFTERMATH Fatah, the P.A.’s lead political faction, mourned the death of its “heroic martyr, Nimr Mahmoud Ahmed Jamal,’’ reported Israel-based Palestinian Media Watch. Hamas branded Jamal’s attack “a new chapter” in the Jerusalem uprising and “a confirmation from the uprising youth that the fighting will continue until the complete freedom of the people and the land.” While Fatah claims to recognize Israel’s right to exist (despite an anti- Zionist governmental drumbeat), Hamas wants to destroy it. The P.A. eyes an Israeli-free Palestinian state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip with the Arab-dominated eastern sector of Jerusalem (under Jordanian control from 1948 until Israel captured it the Six-Day War of 1967) as its capital. It’s uncertain how the latest act of Palestinian terror will affect Israeli policy toward the thousands of Palestinian workers with work permits. Israel needs laborers. And most Palestinians, grudg- ingly or otherwise, depend on Israel for their livelihoods and dreams of better lives. Still, the vetting process for the coveted work permits and the concur- rent ease of passage they allow should be scrupulously reviewed. SEEKING PEACE With each new Palestinian act of terror, U.S. envoy Jason Greenblatt’s efforts to promote existing accords and coopera- tive prospects in hopes of improving the climate for another negotiating round become more strained. While a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains the goal when conditions are right, Israel’s security must never be compromised in the pursuit of peace. P.A. President Mahmoud Abbas’ double-talk in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly on the day terror struck Har Adar doesn’t help mat- ters. First, Abbas saluted “our glorious mar- tyrs” (outright terrorists) and “our coura- geous prisoners in Israeli jails” (most of whom are linked to terrorism). Then Abbas imagined either “the inde- pendence of the state of Palestine, living side by side in peace and security with the State of Israel on the 1967 borders” (a view militarily indefensible given Israel’s very narrow mid-point) or “equal rights for all of the inhabitants of the land of historic Palestine from the river to the sea” — a defiant, utterly senseless scenar- io that would spell the end of Israel. • Who Is ‘Morally Perplexed?’ A Sept. 28 letter writer can’t deny the current president was “morally perplexed,” calling white suprema- cist demonstrators “fine people.” To deflect, he attacks former President Obama with irrelevant issues and flat- out lies. President Obama didn’t “swoon” over Reverend Wright. He worshipped at his church. When a people has been systematically oppressed by major- ity culture, sometimes the rhetoric of resistance becomes extreme without being literal. President Obama did not slight Netanyahu. “Specifically, [ former Ambassador Michael] Oren explained his consistent “frustration” over the vicious “snub” rumor that has been circulating since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the United States in March (Source: JACPAC). Great Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia joined the U.S. on the Iran Agreement. As of July 2017, the administration confirmed Iran is in compliance, and extended the sanc- tions relief given in exchange for curbs on its atomic program. (The Guardian, April/July, 2017.) Also false — Iran was “given” $150 billion. From Politifact, March 2016: “The deal only releases assets frozen because of Iran’s nuclear program. Assets blocked because of other sanc- tions (on terrorism, human rights and missile technology) won’t change as a result of the agreement.” The U.N. resolution had no force, did not cede the Wall and represented no new stance on international criti- cism of settlements. According to the Brookings Institution, December 2016: “The U.S. abstention — the focus of a great deal of personal rage against Obama by Netanyahu and others — was not new either. In 1987, the Reagan administration abstained and allowed the passage of UNSCR 605 … the George W. Bush administration voted in favor of UNSCR 1515, which called … for a full settlement freeze … In fact, until this latest resolution, Obama had been the only president not to let a resolution critical of Israeli policy pass in the Security Council.” President Obama didn’t select DNC leaders. Ellison and Soros are not anti- Semites just because the letter-writer says so. Political criticism of Israel isn’t anti-Semitism. The current president is “morally perplexed” if not altogether amoral. No amount of lies can distract from the shame he has brought to our country. Cynthia Brody Beverly Hills continued on page 10 8 October 12 • 2017 jn