» to rah por tion Can Violence Be Justified? Parshat Pinchas: Numbers 25:10- 30:1; I Kings 18:46-19:21. S Richardson c ntia Po il Tra Maple Maple 14 Mile Rd. Decker Pontiac Trail Benstein Wixom Glengarry Rd. HURON VALLEY-SINAI Commerce Rd. HOSPITAL Halsted . Sleeth Rd Commerce E. Commerce Rd. Burns Rd. everal years ago, while par- lence to the back- ticipating in a weekly parshah ground, Pinchas learning group, I was stunned is rehabilitated and to hear the instructor cite and defend a brought back in sync with his controversial present-day interpretation grandfather Aaron, the great “lover of that presented the actions of Pinchas, peace and pursuer of peace who respect- the title character of this week’s Torah ed all creatures and brought them closer portion, as a model for present- to the Torah.” day Jewish behavior. In a larger sense, the reha- Pinchas, the grandson of bilitation of Pinchas exempli- Aaron and the eventual heir to fies two broader pillars of the the high priesthood, violently rabbinic worldview. First and impaled an Israelite heretic foremost, our sages had deep and his Midianite mistress who reservations about violence were engaged in illicit activ- and shared the notion that ity in front of Moses and the violence is acceptable only as Professor Mishkan. Before I could take a last resort. (They more or issue with this defense of such Howard N. less agreed in this respect with Lupovitch extreme behavior, the other Isaac Asimov, who described members of the class leapt in violence as “the last refuge of to object: Even if the behavior the incompetent.”) of Pinchas is justifiable in a biblical con- Onkelos, a second-century commen- text, surely it is not an archetype for any tator, referred to Pinchas as “Pinchas current situation. Kanai” or Pinchas the Zealot, a stinging Faced with unanimous dissent and indictment in light of the belief that the outrage, the instructor backpedaled and blind hatred of the Zealots was a central retracted. element in the destruction of Jerusalem One might say that this exchange and the Temple. reflects an age-old ambivalence about To be sure, there was and is no deny- the actions of Pinchas, an ambivalence ing that the Bible is replete with violent that is detectible even in the text of the acts of holy war; Pinchas’ act is followed Torah itself. Pinchas, after all, was not almost immediately by a Divine call for censured for his homicidal behavior, holy war against the Midianites. neither by God nor by Moses. Yet Milhemet Mitzvah (the rabbinic On the contrary, he is rewarded with term for holy war) was steadily confined brit shalom, a covenant of peace — an to a few specific cases — defense of the odd choice of words in light of the vio- Land of Israel and war on the seven lent nature of his actions — and a reaf- Canaanite nations and Amalek; and firmation of his family’s eternal priestly even the latter was gradually re-under- dynasty. stood more metaphorically as a struggle Indeed, the contrast between his against evil than an actual instruction to violent act and the reward of peace has hunt down and kill descendants of this reverberated across centuries of biblical tribe. interpretation. A central thread running Second, the rabbis saw Pinchas’ through these commentaries is an insis- behavior as epitomizing extremism, tence that Pinchas was not rewarded for which the rabbis repeatedly discouraged his violent action per se, but rather in in favor of moderation. Sforno expressed spite of it. this idea succinctly: God detests extrem- Various commentators adduced other ism and prefers moderation. reasons for this eternal reward, reasons The upshot is that, while Pinchas’ that jibe with the notion of a covenant violent act was not condemned in the of peace, including: Pinchas is ennobled specific context of biblical narrative, it and granted peace for having the cour- may neither be celebrated nor defended age to fight (Rabbi Obadiah Sforno, Italy, as a guide for subsequent behavior, least 16th century); or since he acted in the of all today. name of peace to assuage God’s wrath, he was blessed with a peaceful demean- Dr. Howard N. Lupovitch is an associate professor of history at Wayne State University and director of or (Ha’omek Davar, 19th century). The upshot is that, by moving the vio- WSU’s Cohn-Haddow Center for Judaic Studies. Gran d Riv er Av e. 12 Mile Rd. * 2104800 July 28 • 2016 41