A Man Of Contradictions Jabotinsky was a novelist, Russian journalist and founder of the branch of Zionism now headed by Benjamin Netanyahu. New book explores the most misunderstood of all Zionist politicians, Ze'ev Jabotinsky. Rabbi Jack Riemer JNS.org I confess that I came to Hillel Halkin's Jabotinsky: A Life (Yale University Press/Jewish Lives Series) with some suspicion. First, Daniel Gordis wrote a book about former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin with a rave review by Halkin, and then Halkin wrote a book about Ze'ev Jabotinsky, Begin's mentor, with a rave review by Gordis — so I suspected that Halkin's new volume would be a work of fluff. But it turns out to be both a serious work of scholarship and an honest evalu- ation of Jabotinsky (1880-1940) and his place in Zionist history. (Editor's Note: Daniel Gordis is scheduled to speak about Menachem Begin: The Battle for Israel's Soul on Nov. 13 as part of this year's JCC Jewish Book Fair.) Jabotinsky (ne Vladimir Zhabotinsky) was a controversial figure in Zionist affairs, demonized by the left and wor- shipped by the right, yet Halkin has drawn an honest portrait of the man, warts and all. He has tracked down almost everything Jabotinsky ever wrote, whether it was in Russian, German, Yiddish, Italian, English or French. Four things emerge from this portrait: One was that Jabotinsky was prescient. He was one of the first to anticipate that England would win World War I and that it would drive the Turks out of Palestine, and therefore that Zionism's future depended on it. He foresaw ahead of others that England would betray the Balfour Declaration — a British expres- sion of support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine — unless enough pressure was exerted on them not to. He understood from the start that socialism could not develop the economy of Palestine soon enough to attract mas- sive Jewish immigration. He grasped early on that European Jewry was on the brink of catastrophe. And he understood long before others that the interest of the Jews and the Arabs in Palestine were irreconcilable, that they could only be resolved by war — and that in the end there could only be one winner. The second truth emerging from this book is that Jabotinsky never had much real success. He was never able to win a significant number of delegates to the World Zionist Organization or to com- mand much respect for the break-off no way to peace except through strength, group that he formed. but what would you say if you could He was able to form a couple of com- speak to Israelis today? panies of Jewish soldiers within the "Would you advise us to hold on to all British army, but they had little impact the territories or to give them back for on the war and none afterward. Most the sake of peace? Would you advise us of his plans were fantasies that never to go on ruling over millions of Arabs materialized. He was not even able to against their wishes and against the will control his own people in Palestine of the world or would you tell us to work HILLEL HALKIN from a distance. for a settlement of some kind?" His one lasting achievement was the "Make the best deal you can;' creation of Betar, the movement that Jabotinsky replies. "I am sorry that I Hillel Halkin addresses Jabotinsky's centered on creating a new kind of Jew, can't be more specific. The settlements, position, unique among the great figures one who had self-discipline and a deep Jerusalem, the borders — the details are of Zionist history, as both a territorial sense of honor. There are still streets everything, but I can't speak about the maximalist and a principled believer in in every large city in Israel named for details from where I am now. democracy. him, and Prime Ministers Begin, Yitzhak "All I can tell you is that you have to be Shamir and Benjamin Netanyahu are smart and you have to be tough in order each in their own way his disciples. to negotiate, and you have to be smart But it is Betar, and its vision of a new cal adulation. Instead, he has analyzed and you have to be tough in order to live kind of Jew who has sloughed off the one of the most romantic and controver- in this world. So make the best deal that sial figures in the entire Zionist story, in ways of the ghetto, that remains his you can:' memorial. all of his complexities. And with that, Jabotinsky gets up, pays Halkin's third truth is that Jabotinsky At the end of the book, he relays a the waiter and goes back into history. wonderful scene in which he imagines was a man of many contradictions. He The last lines with which he leaves had enormous literary talent but never interviewing Jabotinsky in a Parisian cafe, readers not only provide a good summary sat still long enough to develop it. He some 60 years after the establishment of of the way he tried to live in his own time dedicated himself to a people and to a the State of Israel. but are important words to consider as land that he never felt comfortable in. He He tells Jabotinsky: "You were a man we struggle with the challenges Israel believed in individualism, but he devel- of the right. You believed that there was faces today. oped a philosophy that called upon the individual to subordinate himself to the group. He abhorred fascism, but created a Celebrity Jews from page 58 party and a youth movement that had all the trimmings of it. The fourth truth Halkin learns is that Jabotinsky was a different kind of Jew than Chaim Weizmann, David Ben- very young. When she moved to care less. • ow,. Hollywood in the early 1940s, As her son Stephen Humphrey Gurion and other heroes of early Israel. 16 she acquiesced to filmmaker Bogart wrote in his book, Bogart: He grew up in cosmopolitan Odessa, Howard Hawk's request that she In Search of My Father. "My not in the shtetl, and had almost no change her name to Lauren and mother was a lapsed Jew, and my Jewish education or involvement in adopted her mother's maiden father was a lapsed Episcopalian. Jewish tradition. He could very well have 1 ■ 1 name, Bacal (adding an "I" to Neither of my parents had any become a participant in the general cul- make it more pronounceable), strong belief in God, but, like ture and not a Jewish spokesman. He was never telling Hawks she was many parents, they sent their a poet, a novelist, a journalist, a transla- Jewish – as a sign of the anti- children to Sunday school, out of tor and a playwright, who was proficient in many languages and at home in many Semitic times. a vague sense that religion was Nevertheless, as reported in a good thing for a kid. We were cultures. the New York Times, Bacall wrote being raised Episcopalian rather The tension between his Jewish patrio- in her autobiography that she felt than Jewish because my mother tism on the one hand and his attach- "totally Jewish and always would" felt that would make life easier ment to European culture on the other struggled for supremacy within him for and once asked Bogart whether for [my sister] Leslie and me all his life. it mattered to him that she was during those post-World War II Jewish. Bogart said he couldn't years." Halkin has not done a work of uncriti- ❑ Jews xi CD GO ci) ❑ August 21 • 2014 61