world >> opinion Kerry's Betrayal Of Israel W hen the Times of Israel's Avi Issacharoff first reported the content of John Kerry's cease-fire proposal on Friday afternoon, I wondered if something had gotten lost in translation. It seemed inconceivable that the American secretary of state would have drafted an initiative that, as a priority, did not require the dismantling of Hamas' rocket arsenal and network of tunnels dug under the Israeli border. Yet the reported text did not address these issues at all, nor call for the demili- tarization of Gaza. It seemed inconceivable that the secretary's initiative would specify the need to address Hamas' demands for a lifting of the siege of Gaza, as though Hamas were a legitimate injured party acting in the interests of the people of Gaza — rather than the terror group that violently seized control of the strip in 2007, diverted Gaza's resources to its war effort against Israel, and could be relied upon to exploit any lifting of the "siege" in order to import yet more devastating weaponry with which to kill Israelis. Israel and the U.S. are meant to be allies; the U.S. is meant to be committed to the protection of Israel in this most ruthless of neighborhoods; together, the U.S. and Israel are meant to be trying to marginalize the murderous Islamic extremism that threat- ens the free world. Yet here was the top U.S. diplomat appearing to accommodate a vicious terrorist organization bent on Israel's destruction, with a formula that would leave Hamas better equipped to achieve that goal. The appalled response to the Kerry pro- posal by the members of the security cabi- net on Friday night, however, made plain nothing had gotten lost in translation at all. The secretary's proposal man- aged to unite Israel's disparate group of key political lead- ers — from Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Liberman on the right, through Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, to Yair Lapid and Tzipi Livni on the center-left — in a unanimous response of horrified rejection and leaked castigation. The Netanyahu govern- ment has had no shortage of run-ins with Kerry in the mere 18 months he has held office. The prime minister publicly pleaded with him in November not to sign the interim deal with Iran on its rogue nuclear program, and there has been constant friction between the two govern- ments over thwarting Iran's bid for the bomb. Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon in January ridiculed Kerry's security propos- als for a West Bank withdrawal, calling the secretary "messianic" and obsessive" in his quest for an accord with the Palestinians that simply wasn't there. The collapse of the talks in March-April was accompanied by allegations from Jerusalem that Kerry had botched the process, telling Israel one thing and the Palestinian Authority another, including misrepresenting Israel's position on Palestinian prisoner releases. But none of those episodes, though deep- U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry talks by phone to Israeli Prime neled under the Egyptian ini- tiative," a document, to quote from another of those leaked comments, that reads like it Minister Benjamin was drawn up for or even by Netanyahu on July Hamas' Khaled Mashaal. 25 from his hotel And Kerry didn't let up room in Cairo, after unleashing his dreadful Egypt. proposal. Following Friday's fiasco, he jetted off to Paris and, quite extraordinarily, convened further consulta- tions dominated by countries ly troubling and relating to issues central to that overtly wish to do Israel harm. He Israel's well-being, provoked the kind of out- met with his counterparts from Turkey, raged disbelief at Kerry's performance that whose Hamas-backing leadership has lately has been emanating from the Israeli lead- accused Israel of attempting genocide in ership in the past 48 hours. Leaked com- Gaza and compared Netanyahu to Hitler, ments from unnamed senior government and with Qatar, Hamas' funder-in-chief, sources to Army Radio, Channel 2 and other directly accused by President Shimon Peres Hebrew outlets have described the secretary last week of financing Hamas' rockets and as amateurish, incompetent, incapable of tunnels. Staggeringly, he did not bring understanding the material he is dealing Israel, Egypt or the P.A. to his Paris sessions. with — in short, a blithering fool. When Kerry's predecessor, Hillary But actually, it's worse than that. What Clinton, got involved in the effort to broker emerges from Kerry's self-initiated cease-fire terms for ending Operation Pillar of Defense mission — Israel had already accepted the in November 2012, it was self-evident, first, Egyptian cease-fire proposal; and nobody that a cease-fire was at hand, and, second, asked him to come out on a trip he pref- that the diplomatic work was being coordi- aced with sneering remarks about Israel's nated effectively with Jerusalem to ensure attempted "pinpoint" strikes on Hamas ter- that Israel's vital interests were being served. ror targets — is that Jerusalem now regards It is a testament to Kerry's incompetence (or him as duplicitous and dangerous. worse) and to the collapse of faith between Contrary to his public claim at his press him and Israel, that, when he headed igno- conference in Cairo that his cease-fire miniously home on Saturday, neither of proposal was "built on" the Egyptian initia- those assumptions held sway. tive, it manifestly is nothing of the kind. As Whether through ineptitude, malice or indicated by the unconfirmed text reported both, Kerry's intervention was not a case by Issacharoff, by other subsequent reports of America's top diplomat coming to our of its content and by the cabinet's outraged region to help ensure, through astute nego- rejection, it is a proposal that, to quote an tiation, the protection of a key ally. This was unnamed official cited by Channel 2, "tun- a betrayal. 'Israel Has No Better Friend Than Kerry' Rebecca Shimoni Stoll Times of Israel T he Obama administration went on the defensive Monday afternoon, criticizing Israeli sources for leaking details of a Gaza cease-fire draft, downplay- ing the status of the draft and then deny- ing allegations that the draft represented a capitulation to Hamas demands. "We were surprised that the draft was leaked to the press," State Department Spokesperson Jen Psaki told reporters Monday. Leaks and criticism of the sort that Secretary of State John Kerry faced over the weekend are "simply not the way allies and partners treat each other," Psaki complained. Psaki emphasized that "there was never a formal U.S. proposal presented," explaining that the U.S. had instead "sent a confidential- labeled draft of ideas based on the Egyptian proposal." 36 July 31 • 2014 1 unfortunately, I think was misin- formed or an effort to misinform." 1 Blinken also defended Kerry, 0 arguing that "Israel has no better friend, no stronger defender." "No one," said Blinken, "has done more" to achieve peace in the region. Far from including Hamas demands, as Israeli officials complained that the U.S. plan did, Psaki said that the "main difference" was that the U.S. draft John Kerry, center, stands with Turkish Foreign included more specific language Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, left, and Qatari Foreign regarding humanitarian aid to Minister Khalid al-Attiyah in Paris on July 26. Gaza. Defending against Israeli com- Deputy National Security Adviser Tony plaints that the document did not address Blinken took a step even further back than the problems of Hamas terror tunnels into Psaki, describing the leaked document as a Israel, Psaki said that there was no mention "discussion paper based on ... the original of tunnels in the Egyptian cease-fire proposal Egyptian initiative." that Israel had already approved, and which Blinken suggested that "what was leaked, Hamas rejected. ❑ Psaki also defended against complaints that Kerry's primary interlocutors in con- figuring his proposal were not Israel, the Palestinian Authority or Egypt, but rather Turkey and Qatar. "When people are dying, it's important to engage parties that have influence on Hamas," she countered. The "U.S. objective has been and remains stopping the rocket fire against Israeli citi- zens," Psaki continued, adding that the first step to such an outcome was the mainte- nance of a humanitarian cease-fire. Addressing members of the media early Monday afternoon, Blinken acknowledged that the challenges posed by urban counter- terror operations were not limited to Israel. "Civilian suffering in Gaza is great and grow- ing every day," he said, adding that "this is a problem we've grappled with in Iraq and Afghanistan." Likewise, Blinken said that "the record is clear" that Israel acceded to the Egyptian cease-fire proposal, while Hamas did not, and [Hamas] "intentionally targets civilians:' ❑