oints of view >> Send letters to: letters@thejewishnews.com Guest Column Editorial Making The Case For The Arts As A Jewish Communal Priority T he announcement that the UJA- ning schemes are central both as attractions Federation in New York will not be that spur other commercial activities such as renewing the innovative Six Points dining and shopping, but also as builders of Fellowship Program is part of a trend that community that provide a common cultural reveals that funding for the arts is falling even gathering space. further down on our list of Jewish communal At a time when municipalities, governments priorities. and secular foundations are investing more in More discouraging evidence of this can be ensuring a thriving creative community, the seen in the recent Next Gen Donor report Jewish community would be wise to make simi- issued by 21/64 and the Johnson lar investments to ensure a strong Center for Philanthropy, which and knowledgeable Jewish voice. relates that the next generation of The golden ages of Jewish life philanthropists is even less likely to have always revolved around cities support the arts than their parents — Jerusalem and Cordoba, Krakow and grandparents. and Warsaw, Berlin and Prague, The evolving nature of Jewish New York and Tel Aviv. One of the philanthropy presents additional key factors in those golden ages challenges to the arts where the new were (depending on the era) strong emphasis is on basic needs, mea- creative voices in poetry, theater, surable impacts, "hands-on" donor music, film, literature, dance and Joshua Ford involvement and a distrust of tradi- visual arts. We need to recognize tional institutions. These are unique this is something our people need cultural problems for arts institutions and art- for a healthy communal eco-system particu- ists to respond to. larly as it regards the crucial tasks of identity The closure of the Six Points Fellowship in formation, education and critical examination N.Y. (the Los Angeles branch continues for of our society — all roles the arts are particu- now), JDub Record's shutdown in 2011 and larly well-suited to. the attrition of Jewish art producers like the If, as is reported in the 21/64 report, civil Traveling Jewish Theater in San Francisco and rights, the environment and advocacy are cutting-edge art venues like 92Y Tribeca has emergent priorities for Next Gen Donors, then yet to provoke a thoughtful conversation about we have to make the case that those issues and advocacy for the importance of Jewish have long been incubated and found their arts in the thriving Jewish communities we are most articulate expression through the arts. seeking to create. It is not enough anymore for art to speak It is vital for arts institutions in the Jewish for itself, just as it is not enough for Jewish community, Jewish artists and the current education to be an end in itself, but to strongly generation of philanthropists that support the make the case that both these priorities pro- arts to begin articulating the argument that vide a way for us to be in the world, as a ves- the support of the arts is not a distraction sel for our values and a framework for our from the values the next generation of philan- actions. thropy seeks to support, but central to them. Similarly, it is incumbent on Jewish art- Further, Jewish art-makers and art presenters ists and institutions to recognize the blurring need to examine their practices and adapt to line between art creators and art consumers. new ways of presenting their art that allows Engaging audiences can no longer just mean for more interactive, dynamic and engaging panel discussions following a performance, but relationships with their audiences and donors. actual engagement in the creation of art itself. This is all achievable, but it will require arts The online world has broadened access to the administrators and artists to step outside of world of art-making, and we need to find a their traditional comfort zones. way to harness that energy into effective and First, the argument needs to be made that compelling projects of real artistic merit. art deserves an important place in Jewish One intriguing model is Joseph Gordon- community priorities. Rather than relying Levitt's HitRecord initiative, which involves on traditional and sentimental appeals to the massive collaborations across various media transformative power of art (true though it is), and is currently ramping up its own television we might be better served to point to the revo- show. This is the challenge for the next generation lution in urban planning that has accompa- nied the revival of America's great cities over of artists, philanthropists and institutions. the past 20 years. During that time, the cre- While it is certain that artists will continue to ation of "mixed use zones" to provide a combi- create art — true artists have no other choice nation of living, shopping and entertainment — whether we will harness those individual opportunities in urban communities has been and collective energies into an asset for the a central practice that has enjoyed tremendous Jewish community remains to be seen. success and has become the national model in Joshua Ford is associate executive director at the cities from Washington, D.C., to Seattle. Washington, D.C., Jewish Community Center. Dedicated arts spaces in these new plan- ❑ New Iranian President Offers Slightest Hope W hat's most important to understand about the new Iranian president, upbeat as his election may have been given the choices handpicked by the regime, is that he's a longtime associate of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khameini, who has shown only disdain for Israel and the West. Hassan Rouhani, a well-educated, multilin- gual, calculating cleric, played to his moder- ate and reformer image following the June 14 election, prompting the thought that he might actually be the right guy to ease the friction between Tehran and Washington. The Islamic Republic's former national security adviser and chief nuclear negotiator seemed to want reconciliation with the U.S. and seemed to be Hassan willing to make Iran's nuclear program, which Rouhani he claims is peaceful, more transparent. But he isn't willing to reduce uranium enrichment, a key to developing a bomb. In a country where citizens hunger for a better day, Rouhani grabbed more than 50 percent of the vote amid a field of six candidates, including some very shady characters. He has big shoes to fill, for all the wrong reasons. His predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was anti-West and anti-Israel – and stunningly, denied the Holocaust. Will Rouhani, who wasn't above describing Israel as "the great Zionist Satan," really embrace the relative moderation he's now espousing, namely, rebuilding freedoms in a human rights-starved land? He could prove a significant bridge-builder. Or he could be cloaked in smoke and mirrors. Rouhani, 64, a transplanted Scot, is chameleon-like. Importantly, he displays a knack for engaging the West while boasting an "in" with Ayatollah Khameini, a friendship honed since a 1967 train ride. His years advising on national secu- rity and negotiating on nuclear development should give him invaluable insight into and appreciation for what's in Iran's best interests economically and politically. He doesn't appear fool- ish enough to believe the regime should pursue nuclear arms at any cost. In his campaign, he touted the belief that "resis- tance," a popular Islamist refrain, amounted to self-punishment against mounting international sanctions. Still, the Israel Project biography of Rouhani relates how he rose through the Iranian government through ties with Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, president during much of the 1990s, a peri- od when Iran stepped up international terror as well as uranium enrichment. Leaving him forever tarnished, Rouhani also was part of the Iranian government unit that plotted the 1994 AMIA Jewish Community Center bombing in Buenos Aires, Argentina, which killed 85 people and injured more than 250 others. Alireza Nader, an Iran policy analyst at Rand Corp., a U.S. think tank, told JTA, a Jewish wire service, that Rouhani is "acceptable to both sides, to Khameini and the conservatives and to the reformists. "This is an opportunity for Khameini to make concessions to change and to save face," Nader said. Indeed – or Rouhani might just be a more palatable front man for the regime than the flamboyant Ahmadinejad. It's hard to believe Rouhani will have the panache to bridge the chasm within Iranian leadership and ultimately help the Iranian people. That's a tall order given that Iran is the No.1 state sponsor of terror. Remember: Hezbollah, Hamas and Syria's Basher Assad are all in cahoots with Iran's ruling mullahs, who already have at their behest the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, whose range of influence marks every sector of Iranian life. ❑ July 18 • 2013 37