Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options


Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

August 23, 2012 - Image 6

Resource type:
The Detroit Jewish News, 2012-08-23

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.




>> letters



Letters from page 5

Arthur M. Horwitz

Publisher / Executive Editor


Jackie Headapohl
Managing Editor


Keri Guten Cohen
Story Development Editor


Gail Zimmerman
Arts Editor


Deborah Schultz
Corporate Creative Director



Senior Copy Editor
David Sachs

Editorial Assistant
Sy Manello

Senior Columnist
Danny Raskin

Contributing Editor
Robert Sklar

Contributing Writers
Bill Carroll
Suzanne Chessler
Annabel Cohen
Don Cohen
Shelli Liebman Dorfman
Ronelle Grier
Esther Allweiss Ingber
Harry Kirsbaum
Lynne Konstantin
Rabbi Jason Miller
Allan Nahajewski
Robin Schwartz
Steve Stein



Managing Editor
Jackie Headapohl

Executive Editor
Gail Zimmerman

Peace? School Board Needs
Transparency, Accountability
The letter "We Need Peace In Our
Neighborhoods" (Aug. 9, page 5) distorts
the legitimate concerns of the citizens of
Farmington Hills and West Bloomfield. I
suggest that the writer is reacting to the fact
that the purchasers of Eagle Elementary are
an Islamic group.
She stated, "It is no secret that if the
buyer wanted this property for a Christian
or Jewish center, it is unlikely that it would
have created controversy:' This is how she
sets up a specious claim of discrimination.
In fact, there were serious buyers from
both the Christian and Jewish communities
for the purchase of the school. They were
told the property was not for sale. Had the
property been sold to one of those organi-
zations, in an identical manner, and then
been sprung on the community, after it
was, in effect, a done deal, the uproar would
have been just as intense.
The writer claims that what we need is
peace. And she is clearly emotional about
that. So emotional that she made some kind
of connection between the Eagle controver-
sy and the conflict in the Middle East. This
is not an emotional issue nor a question of
peace in the Middle East.
The truth is, the Farmington School
Board has a responsibility to the "multi-
cultural community" to get the best price
possible for an asset that belongs to the tax-
payers, through an open and publicized bid
process. This is not a difficult or obscure
process to understand. The writer needs to
consider better what her emotional accusa-
tions mean. Rather than focusing on what
is the best outcome for the citizens of the
Farmington school district, she is mak-
ing accusations of reprehensible behavior
against the citizens of our community.
Really? Had the school board postponed
making a decision on the bid they received,
then Eagle school could have been market-
ed properly, for the best price and thereby
have avoided the legal process. In that
event, any purchaser, including the Islamic
Cultural Association, would have had equal
opportunity to purchase the property.
If the situation, as the writer claims, is
toxic, how do her accusations increase or
decrease the toxicity? And how do her ram-
blings about Michele Bachman improve her
point of view? She asks what is the goal of
those protesting the Eagle sale? That's sim-
ple. Since the school board did not handle
the sale properly, the community has taken
on the responsibility to hold the school
board accountable. That's how we operate
in a democracy.

Dorene Weisberg

Contributing Editor
Keri Guten Cohen



August 23 2012

West Bloomfield

See a related story on page 18.

Chabad-Lubavitch Explains
Need To Appeal Lawsuit
Although we understood from the begin-
ning that this complex case could require a
process involving multiple steps through the
legal system, we are disappointed that the

case was dismissed by the circuit court on
a procedural matter and that its fundamental
issue has not yet been judged on its merits.
That is why we are asking the Michigan
Court of Appeals to consider this case.
It is important for the community to
remember that Chabad Lubavitch is an
organization with a special mission to the
Jewish community and has executed that
mission successfully in Michigan for more
than 50 years.
Our movement has a specific form
of governance based on Jewish law and
Lubavitch tradition. This is imperative to
the success of the movement, its future
and its ability to work together in a cohe-
sive manner. Any tampering with that sys-
tem would undermine the structure of the
movement. At its core, this case is about
following Jewish law, rules and rabbinical
court decisions.
Throughout this case, the ownership
and authority of Bais Chabad has been
determined by numerous rabbinical bod-
ies, based on Jewish law and Lubavitch
tradition. We sought action in the secular
courts with full permission of the rabbinic
courts and only because the rulings of the
rabbinic courts were not followed.
We still hope that Bais Chabad and
its rabbi will change their direction and
choose to abide by the rabbinical rulings.
That would save additional money, heart-
ache and division within the community.
It is not an option of Chabad-Lubavitch
of Michigan to walk away from this case
and somehow grant independence to Bais
Chabad, as that is a right not granted to
our organization.
Under Jewish law and Lubavitch tradi-
tion, the director of this organization
is entrusted by the Rebbe, of blessed
memory, and the Lubavitch movement as
a custodian to build, protect and secure
the success and future of the movement,
its property and the funds that rightfully
belong to the organization.
Because some have charged, via the
Jewish News, that we plan to somehow
take away Bais Chabad and displace its
members, we reiterate what we wrote in
our letter to the congregation on the day
that circuit court litigation was filed:
"While this suit is going on, we encour-
age the members of Bais Chabad to con-
tinue to pray, attend services and study at
Bais Chabad. We do not wish this case to
cause any disruptions in the operations of
the congregation.
"It is our hope that after this situation
is resolved with the authority of Chabad
Lubavitch of Michigan rightfully estab-
lished, that Bais Chabad will continue
to grow as a place of Torah and chasidus
in the community. Chabad Lubavitch of
Michigan will not, God forbid, interfere
and will indeed be willing to help in facili-
tating the growth of the congregation."

Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan

Oak Park

See a related story on page 12.

Letters on page 24

F. Kevin Browett

Chief Operating Officer


Keith Farber

Sales Director


Account Executives
Ann G. Abrams
Jan Haskell
Melissa Litvin
Heidi Martin
Rick Nessel

Senior Sales Assistant

Kim Metzger

Customer Service Asst.

Jan Shain
Billing Coordinator
Pamela Turner
Collections Analyst
Hazel Bender



Scott Drzewiecki
Amy Pollard
Pam Sherevan
Michelle Sheridan
Susan Walker



Michael H. Steinhardt

Arthur M. Horwitz

Chief Operating Officer
F. Kevin Browett

Craig R. Phipps

Corporate Creative Director
Deborah Schultz


Customer Service Manager:
Zena Davis


General Offices: 248-354-6060
Advertising: 248-351-5107
Advertising Fax: 248-304-0049
Circulation: 248-351-5174
Advertising Deadline: Monday. 2 p.m.
Editorial Fax: 248-304-8885
Deadline: All public and social announcements must
be typewritten and received by noon Tuesday, nine
days prior to desired date of publication.
1 year
2 years
3 years
1 year out-of-state
2 years out-of-state
Per year foreign

Detroit Jewish News
29200 Northwestern Highway
Suite 110
Southfield, MI 48034
© 2011 Detroit Jewish News

Back to Top

© 2021 Regents of the University of Michigan