Rhetoric from page 34 and U.S. concerns that he would follow up the application with uni- lateral actions. Israel and the United States have emphatically opposed the Palestinians' statehood recognition bid at the U.N. But if Abbas' bottom line was aimed at pushing back against charges that he was acting unilater- ally, his rhetoric was bound to raise hackles — and seemingly did, given the walkouts by at least two members of the Israeli delegations, Cabinet ministers Avigdor Lieberman and Yuli Edelstein, and the refusal to applaud by Susan Rice, the U.S. envoy. After the speech, Rice tweeted: "When the speeches end today, we must all recognize that the only way to create a state is through direct negotiations. No shortcuts." Abbas also invoked, to vigorous applause, his predecessor Yasser Arafat's 1974 appearance before the same body. He cited Arafat's raising of an olive branch on that occasion, say- ing it was still held out — but did not mention the gun holster Arafat wore, against U.N. regulations and at his insistence. That pistol disgusted the United States and Israel at the time, and for years helped define Arafat in the West not as a man of peace, but as a blood-seeking grandstander. Netanyahu called on Mahmoud Abbas to launch talks immediately in New York and said he was ready to move ahead" with U.S.-backed param- eters. "I extend my hand, the hand of Israel in peace — I hope you will grasp that:' Netanyahu said. "If we genuinely want peace, let us meet in this building." Abbas had reiterated in his speech his precondition that Israel freeze all settlement building. It was the first time Netanyahu pub- licly suggested that he was ready to negotiate on the basis of parameters President Obama laid out in a speech in May; at the time, Netanyahu had objected vigorously to Obama's call for negotiations based in 1967 lines, with mutually agreed land swaps. "There were things in the ideas" Obama proposed "about borders that I didn't like, there were things about the Jewish state that I'm sure the Palestinians didn't like," Netanyahu said. "For all my reservations, I was willing to move ahead." Netanyahu reportedly has in recent weeks privately told American inter- locutors he is willing to work with Obama's parameters. (( Telling The Truth On The TV News Shows Herb Keinon Jersualem Post I f people around the world were too busy Friday to tune in live to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech before the United Nations General Assemby and missed his articulation of what he said was Israel's "truth," then all they had to do was tune in to any number of television interview shows over the weekend — from ABC, CNN, NBC, Fox News and even BBC's Arabic service — and get a concise summation. "The truth," Netanyahu had said at the U.N., "is that Israel wants peace ... The truth is that so far the Palestinians have refused to negoti- ate. The truth is that Israel wants peace with a Palestinian state, but the Palestinians want a state without peace." He repeated this theme on each of the news shows. Also, each TV interviewer attacked the question about U.S. politics: How much of a friend is Obama; is he better or worse than former U.S. president George W. Bush; and what does Netanyahu think about Republican presidential candidates Rick Perry and Mitt Romney slamming Obama for his positions on Israel? Netanyahu's diplomatic reply? "I'm just not going to walk into the minefield of American politics. I've got enough politics back at home,' he told ABC. The prime minister was also asked repeat- edly about former president Bill Clinton's recent criticism that Netanyahu is to blame for the failure of a Middle East peace process because his government won't accept the terms for peace offered by Ehud Barak in 2000. And in each of the interviews, Netanyahu's response was the same: "I regretfully, regret- fully and respectfully disagree with the former President Clinton:' None of the interviews provided much news, though there were a few interesting tidbits, such as his saying on CNN — after being repeatedly pressed on the issue — that he would "be willing to talk about" another settlement freeze. Netanyahu also raised an idea in that inter- view that has not been heard often in the past: That had he wanted to, he, like Abbas, could place conditions on a return to the talks. One precondition, he said, could be to "dis- mantle some of the refugee camps — just one — to know that you're serious about peace, because you know that there won't be peace if they don't rehabilitate the refugees." Netanyahu said he didn't do this because he doesn't believe in preconditions. Iranian President Ahmadinejad addresses the U.N., page 36. Hate Fest from page 34 - controversial head Shame on the UN An anti-Durban poster of the conference, depicting the confer- Durban 3-Ring ence as a three-ring Durban-born Navi Pillay, ended up, wit- circus with Iranian tingly or unwittingly, dictator Ahmadinejad trafficking in rac- dressed as a clown. Coming Soon ism, xenophobia and hatred of Jews. ued isolation of Israel The Jerusalem- in international are- based group NGO nas, such as the U.N. Monitor argues, Human Rights Council "More important and the International than Durban III is Criminal Court:' the Durban Strategy, Durban, following which political advo- NGO Monitor's line of cacy NGOs continue reasoning, spawned to lead. The strategy anti-Israel activities is defined by tactics across other forums, of demonization and delegitimization and in a post-Durban I, II and III that in no way promote coexistence conference world, the fight to combat and a two-state solution. hatred of Israel will revolve around "Instead, the Durban Strategy results blunting boycott, sanctions and divest- in boycott, divestment and sanctions ment tactics against the Jewish state. campaigns [BDS], the Flotilla incident, Though the major E.U. democ- `apartheid' rhetoric, and the like. All racies and Australia, the United of this is in keeping with the general States, New Zealand and Canada Durban message: Instead of creating boycotted Durban, Human Rights something positive for the Palestinian Commissioner Pillay might very well people, the aim is wholly negative use the U.N.'s valuable, and limited, about punishing Israel:" resources to mount a Durban IV con- It added: "While Durban III has ference. fl come and gone, 'mini-Durban' confer- Local Jews protest U.N. actions, page 22. ences continue, along with the contin- Circus ubscribe To RED magazine Get the lastest edition of Red Thread with it's edgy content Enjoy a mix of provocative features and first-person essays; as well as relevant life-skill information and family-oriented material. GO ONLINE TO SUBSCRIBE: REDTHREADMAGAZINE.COM/SUBSCRIBE/ AND SIGN UP NOW!! RED THREAD IS WHAT IS TYING US TOGETHER September 29 2011 35