Jihad from page 43 Editorial • That most advocates of political Islam are non-violent, but ultimately share with radical Islamists a desire to form Islamic states. Therein rests the need for a sea change within the Muslim community, among radicals and moderates alike. The West will be chasing splinter groups of radical Islamists into the next century unless pious Muslims, who believe in Western nation states and their secular system of law over the "Islamic state,' win the internal debate among Muslims. • So America must wake up! At stake is the primacy of our Constitution and governance. Expanding pockets of Europe already are Islamicized. How sobering is that? Scary Brotherhood Jasser narrates and was a major shaper of the Clarion Fund documentary film The Third Jihad-Radical Islam's Vision for America. The film is largely inspired by the FBI discovery of the Muslim Brotherhood's Grand Jihad Manifesto calling for the destruction of America and creation of a radical Islamist the- ocracy instead. The manifesto calls for moderate groups, mosques and Islamic centers, strategically positioned, to weak- en our culture and promote the accep- tance of Sharia (Islamic law). The Muslim community must lead the charge against radical Islam, but it needs outside help. "All of us as American citizens are threatened equally by this threat," Jasser told me. Jasser acknowledged that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has done a fine job preventing dozens of attacks on our citizens domestically and abroad since 9-11. But he stressed that our security also demands Muslim reform. "And thus all faith groups in America:' he told me, "need to become part of facilitating a project to coun- ter the influence and ideologies of the Muslim Brotherhood and its splinter groups around the world if we are to have a sustainable security against radical Islam." The Brotherhood, of course, is a pos- sible successor to toppled President Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, Israel's southern neighbor. Fighting Back From Within Appeasing political Islam will not work. Political Islam is based on Sharia law, which doesn't recognize the complete equality of minorities the way the U.S. Constitution does. The answer lies in activities of all faiths helping Muslims reveal the gravity of Islamism and gov- ernmental imposition of Sharia law. American Jewish groups are positioned to articulate this threat if they have the courage to speak up. As Jasser explained, 44 September 8 • 2011 m "Not only has Israel been dealing with the threat of radical Islam in Hamas, but the Jewish community has suffered as a minority when living in nations under Islamist control, such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, and thus has an additional dimension in understanding this threat." Radical Islam evolved out of the ideol- ogy of the Muslim Brotherhood in the early 20th century with Sayyid Qutb and Hassan Al-Banna at the fore. Through the last century, whether expressed by the Muslim Brotherhood or the Wahhabi rad- icals in Saudi Arabia, radical Islam has been a counter response to the fascists or dictators in control. The moderates who are anti-fascist and anti-Islamist, says Jasser, have been lost in the din of this conflict. "Until these societies can begin to foster an intellectual engagement among Islamists, anti-Islamists and non- Islamists," Jasser told me, "I cannot see the regional neighborhood changing much." Solvable Hurdles Democratization alone is not the solution. Elections, influenced by Arab and Islamist propaganda, have brought to power Islamists, such as Hamas, who prey on their own as well as Jews and the West. "Thus we need the establishment of lib- eral institutions that can enable education about minority rights and the pre-emi- nence of societies based in one law over theocracy, over autocracy, over monarchy and tribalism," Jasser told me. "Until that process begins to happen, the environment will not change, but instead move toward short-term appeasements and long-term stagnation The AILC recommendations for further bolstering the Obama administration's National Strategy on Counterterrorism are thoughtful: • Publicly define the ideology of Al Greenberg's View Qaida and the other terror groups we seek to defeat; • Distinguish Muslims who practice the religion of Islam from Islamists who dis- tort Islam to justify their theocratic, statist agenda; • Recognize that genuine leaders among U.S. Muslims possess the theological legiti- macy, authority and credibility to counter Islamist ideology and movements from within Islam; • Enlist supportive Muslim groups to help develop effective counter-radicaliza- tion programs that affirm the principles of liberty and individual rights; • Distribute via the Internet compelling narratives that counter the online ideologi- cal indoctrination and recruitment success of Al Qaida; and • Help expose Islamist oppression, vio- lence and terror — and contrast that to values in the West. Further Action The film The Third Jihad serves up other solutions to fighting radical Islam: • Find options to oil dependence, which fuels radical Islam, a root cause of Islamist terror; • Demand the end to incitement of Muslim children to lessen their suscepti- bility to Islamist propaganda and potential recruitment to terrorist groups; • Urge human rights for citizens of for- eign countries; •Ask Muslims and their leaders to stand against Sharia replacing Western law; and • Back government leaders who stand up to radical Islam. I'm encouraged that Dr. Jasser thinks the war on radical Islam is winnable. As he put it: "We will win if enough people stand up for the American freedom and liberties that our forefathers fought to create." That's a message worth pondering and heeding as the commemoration of 9-11 nears. II Fix Israel's Fire Service T he government bears the brunt of the blame for the worst forest fire ever in Israel's history, according to a draft report on the 2010 Carmel blaze. It's a telling, but not surprising finding considering it quickly became clear that the Netanyahu administration was ill prepared and ill equipped to fight what became a deadly firebomb. State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss submitted the bad news to government officials, who have until early September to respond. Their response must be focused and sweeping to be credible. The disaster over four days last December killed 44 people, injured more than 30 others, damaged or destroyed 250 homes, forced 17,000 residents to evacuate, consumed 5 million trees, necessitated an international fire fighting brigade and inspired a worldwide relief effort. Government leaders held accountable include Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Interior Minister Eli Yishai, Public Security Minister Yitzhak Aharonovitch and Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz, JTA reported. Notably, the report charges that the interior minister did not sufficiently address fire service issues identified in past reports and did not bring national reform despite questionable government decisions, according to Haaretz. For example, the fire service, so critical to the country's well-being, had only 1,500 firefighters to serve 7 million Israelis. Moreover, there are woodlands up north and plenty of buildings in all the big cities – despite Israel's desert-like image down south. For Netanyahu, upgrading the fire service, starting with overcoming the bad advice he got when it came to budgeting for it, is paramount. ❑