points of view EDITORIAL BOARD: Publisher: Arthur M. Horwitz Chief Operating Officer: F. Kevin Browett Contributing Editor: Robert Sklar >> Send letters to: letters@thejewishnews.com Publisher's Notebook Editorial Sanction Palestinians For Misusing U.S. Aid p Pillars That Resonate Time to overhaul our external engagement model. I f the economic meltdown of 2008-2009 proved anything, it is that despite the cocoon our local Jewish community inhab- ited for years, our future vitality and viability are linked to that of Detroit, the region and Michigan. No Federation's Annual Campaign achievement or United Jewish Foundation endowment balance can shield us from auto industry bankruptcies, plunging residential, commercial and indus- trial real estate values, panicky lending institu- tions, substantial job losses, a tail-spinning stock market and an exodus of young adults in search of better work and social opportunities. However, at a time when our community needs to rethink, rebuild and extend its engagement with the secular world around us, its primary agency for doing this, the Jewish Community Relations Council of Metropolitan Detroit (JCRC), continues to have its mis- sion marginalized, its funding allocation from Federation's Annual Campaign reduced and its impact further diminished. This might be acceptable if a new model for engagement and outreach had been planned and implemented. But it hasn't. Instead, as the JCRC wanes, an amalgam of loosely connected outreach initiatives is filling some of the large void. For example, Federation and its lobbying firm in Lansing focus on preserving allocations that Jewish, Arab and Chaldean social-service agencies receive as part of the state budget's multicultural line item. Federation's CommunityNext initiative cam- paigns to raise funds to subsidize Jewish and non-Jewish young adults interested in living in Detroit. And perhaps our largest oppor- tunity for filling the current void with the secular community, the Jewish Community Center in West Bloomfield, isn't even "at the table." Historic Perspective Sixty years ago, the Jewish Community Council of Detroit (now the JCRC) was a demo- cratic powerhouse, representing 300 orga- nizations through its delegate assemblies and willing to go toe-to-toe with Federation over budget allocations for its cultural and other programming/staffing needs. Back then, a Council leader described his agency as a "so-called affiliate of the Federation." It took the wis- dom of community leaders whose influence spanned Federation and the Council, including Avern Cohn, George M. Zeltzer and Harold Berry, to eventually achieve a sem- blance of amity. Today, the JCRC is reduced to a staff of four with virtually no dollars for programming. They are often looking over their shoul- ders to justify their existence to Federation, which provides 80 percent of the JCRC's diminished operating budget. Dollar Wise A couple of snapshots relating to Federation budget allocations to the JCRC over the past 25 years help to illustrate the decline of the JCRC and our investment in secular community engagement. In 1986, the JCRC (then still known It is essential that we develop a new, realistic 21st-century model for engagement and interaction with the general community. as the Jewish Community Council) received $434,000 of the $7.7 mil- lion allotted by Federation's Allied Jewish Campaign for local needs. In 2011, the JCRC is slated to receive $321,108 of the $ 22.2 million allocated by Federation from its Annual Campaign and challenge fund for local needs. The JCRC will receive an additional $24,000 credit in its budget as an offset for office space it utilizes in the Max M. Fisher Federation Building in Bloomfield Township. The 2011- 2012 JCRC allocation and rent subvention is a 6 percent reduction from its prior year allocation. There is another way to illus- trate this reduction in our com- munity relations investment. While the amount of dollars that Federation has allocated for local needs has increased by approxi- mately $14.5 million since 1986 (an increase of almost 200 per- cent), allocations to the Council have declined by about 20 percent over the same span. New Pillars Needed It's past the time for our Federation and community lead- ership to develop, articulate and Notebook on page 27 26 August 25 2011 resident Obama owes it to U.S. taxpayers to sanction the Palestinian Authority for doling out monthly salaries to 5,500 Palestinians and Israeli Arabs, including terrorists, jailed by Israel. The P.A. taps into its U.S.-supported general fund for the despicable payments. They were approved in April for anyone jailed by the "occupier" for joining In the struggle against the occupation" — meaning anyone imprisoned for an act of terror against Israel. Salaries go not just to members of P.A. President Mahmoud Abbas's gov- erning Fatah party, but also members of Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip and is declared a terrorist organiza- tion by the U.S., Israel, Canada and the European Union. In the wake of the Palestinian Media Watch's July investigative Mahmoud report to the U.S. Congress about Abbas of P.A. these not-so-shocking handouts, Obama should threaten ending U.S. aid to the P.A. — and truly mean it. The Zionist Organization of America underscores that P.A. law stipulates that salaries will be paid based on available funding. Insofar as foreign aid feeds the bulk of the P.A. general budget, such assistance is the major funnel for prisoner payments. In 2010, the U.S. gave $225 million in direct assis- tance and upwards of $600 million in support and investment to the P.A. Given our grave needs at home and other crucial needs abroad, having the P.A. squan- der American generosity is a travesty. In May, the Abbas-led P.A. allocated $5.2 million in prisoner sala- ries. The average prisoner salary is higher than that of P.A. civil servants or military personnel. Let the Obama administration and Congress know just how mad you are that America continues to overlook the terror-promoting, peace-damaging ways of the P.A. Our Congress already is sympathetic to halting aid to the P.A. as long as it embraces a unity government with Hamas, rejects negotiating with Israel and seeks a unilateral declaration of statehood at the United Nations. Continued P.A. support, in fact, mocks U.S. law, which prohibits funding that supports, recognizes or honors anyone who has or had direct terrorist ties. The 2010 legislation authorizing aid to the P.A. requires the U.S. Department of State to ensure that none of the alloca- tion is diverted to anyone or anything that is believed to be an advocate or sponsor for, or who engages or has engaged in, terrorist activity. We know the P.A. regularly glorifies and honors ter- rorists by naming schools, streets and sports teams after them as well as operates a school system that elevates Jew-killers to "martyrdom" and deserving of Allah's praise. Sadly, uncaring leaders ignoring the freedom- seeking intent of the Arab Spring have duped the Palestinian people. The Palestinian Authority incites terror, violence and hatred as a matter of mandate by indoctrinating people on the street via their news media, mosques, schools and youth camps. The P.A. is not deserving of U.S. backing. Ili