Opinion Editorials are posted and archived on JNonline.us . Editorial Fighting for Peace W eve supported a negotiated two-state solution for many years, even though we're still waiting for a credible Palestinian negotiating partner who can deliver the goods. And, ironically and tragically, a successful war against Hamas is a prerequisite for a credible and durable Israeli-Palestinian peace. It was just three weeks ago that Hamas spurned Israeli Prime Minister Olmert's entreaties to extend a tacit six-month ceasefire, choosing instead to escalate rocket, missile and mortar attacks against civilian tar- gets in Israel. Hamas was dead wrong when it figured that Israel had no stomach for war, but its strategy of using Palestinians as human shields and conflating Hamas' future with that of all Palestinians may still reap the dividends of recognition and support. And that would be a tragedy for the cause of peace. But so far, the reliable rhetoric of the anti-Zionists on the Arab street, in parts of Europe and even parts of Dearborn — genocide, Holocaust, massacre, war crimes, Nazis — has not prevented strong Western condemnation of Hamas and a refusal to provide it recognition and support. That is encouraging. What is really needed now is for Israel to have the time to carry out its mission because not only will that protect southern Israel, but also will make peace more likely. If the world stops Israel from stopping Hamas, atwo-state solution is dead. What the U.S, European Union, United Nations, the Quartet, and the majority of Israelis and diaspora Jews see as an ultimate outcome of negotiations will not happen. Look at what Israel has reaped from territorial withdrawal already. Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon and Hezbollah has used it to target Israel. Israel withdrew from Gaza and, ever since, Hamas and other ter- rorist groups have used it to target Israel. If the world stops Israel from stopping Hamas, a two- state solution is dead. Dry Bones mik-t- ISRACL Vtov6D ALL -446. RRoRi s-r PRtSomfiss lb SbER If anyone believes, or expects, that Israel would withdraw from further portions of the West Bank, as well as the Golan Heights, without being allowed to protect its citizens cVOULb should that land be Cb141)001_ NED D used as a base of BL1 *WEST( I operations against it* V.N. them, they are only 'ICE MOIR fooling themselves. Now is the time, when an international pariah and terrorist organization fires on Israel, to let Israel www.drybonesbiog.com know it will be sup- ported. that it is not about a Palestinian state or But as serious as the Hamas threat is, Palestinian lives, but about weakening and the real issue here is Iran. Through its dividing the West. terrorist proxies and its feverish pursuit Sure it sounds Orwellian, but there will of a deliverable nuclear weapon, Iran be no peace without the ability to wage seeks regional hegemony to confront the war in the defense of democracy and free- United States and Europe. The seeming dom. And there will be no two-state solu- irrationality of Hamas firing into Israel tion without the international community in the face of the Israeli military machine only becomes rational when one considers backing Israel as it defends itself. ❑ witikT DO c?ou HAPPEN? You mew cniuR ISRAEL. IF8MG Reality Check A Letter To Henry D ear Congressman Waxman: Now that the collection of prize boobs in the Senate have failed in their attempt to secede from the Union and destroy the U.S. auto industry, it may be time to discuss a few things. Because I'm afraid the automakers are not out of the woods yet. In your new post as chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, you will be having a lot of dealings with the industry and some of your ideas about automobiles are a tad ... well ... peculiar. You seem to believe Americans crave green cars, that Detroit got itself into this pickle by refusing to listen to them and you can run the auto companies better than private managers by loading them up with more mileage requirements and emission standards. I'd like to make a few observations about that. I know you are a dedicated environ- mentalist, and so am I. In fact, I feel very strongly about protecting the environment major industries — movies. in California and the west Los It really stinks. Angeles district you represent; It seems to me that British, just as much as you do about French, Italian and even making cleaner cars. Indian filmmakers are turn- Therefore, I would suggest ing out products with fewer an immediate freeze on federal design flaws and greater disaster relief funds involving residual value than what gets homes built near fault lines churned out of Hollywood. and on hillsides and canyons Georg e Cantor Most of them seem to be susceptible to brush fires and Col umnist aimed at those with the intel- mudslides. ligence level of a 10-year old. I see no reason why taxpayers They get high marks for blowing things up in Michigan should support people who and chasing each other around the land- insist on building homes where no homes scape. Not so much on creating characters should be. If they are dumb enough to the audience cares about and relates to. keep going back to these areas, let nature It is increasingly rare that I can settle take its course. back after the first five minutes of one of I don't know how much this careless these movies and say to my wife, "This is construction has damaged the ecology of actually meant for grownups." southern California. But as an environ- Can you please see what you can do mentalist I am concerned, and as a tax- payer I'd prefer that your constituents keep about that? I'm sure you know a lot more about the film business than you do about their hands out of my wallet. cars. At least, I hope so. I would also like to make a few corn- I don't know where you find empirical ments regarding the quality of one of your evidence of a hunger for green machines. But if it turns out to be wishful thinking, Americans fail to rush out and buy them and the industry crashes and burns, I don't suppose you would accept the blame. Because your heart is pure, and that's what it's all about, isn't it? If Congress seriously wants to reduce consumption and dependence on import- ed oil, all it has to do is raise federal taxes so that pump prices are $5 a gallon or more. But it's much less risky to blame the auto companies and keep piling on regula- tions that will drive them deeper into the financial hole. One final note. Lose the mustache. It makes you look like you're playing the role of the crooked art dealer in a Humphrey Bogart movie. Now that's when they made good movies, and they didn't have to blow up a lot of stuff, either. Yours sincerely, G. Cantor. ❑ George Cantor's e-mail address is gcantor614@aol.com. January 8 e 2009 A27