Opinion Editorials are posted and archived on JNonline.us. Editorial Bank On Fact, Not Rumor T he story was as infuriating as it was predictable. It was first published last April by the Daily Mail in London and then carried by news- papers as prestigious as the Guardian and Times of London. The report said that Holocaust studies had been removed from British school curricula in areas with large Muslim pop- ulations. It indicated that officials were concerned about "offending" students who were being taught a different version of events in their mosques and religious schools; namely, that it was all a myth. The story stirred a wave of outrage because it was consistent with reports of rising anti-Semitism in Britain and the boycott of Israel announced by unions representing British academics and jour- nalists. E-mails were sent out denouncing the action and they were still circulating this month. The problem is that the story is an exaggeration of a single incident in one school district. Even that may be spurious because the news accounts never men- tioned it by name —which should have been a clear red flag. According to Karen Pollock, a spokes- person for the United Kingdom Holocaust Educational Trust, the story came from a line in a report on teaching potentially controversial issues in history, such as slavery, the Crusades and the Holocaust. Pollock says that a course in the Holocaust is mandated by law in the National Curriculum in what is our equiv- alent of the ninth grade. Other students will study it further in classes on religion and citizenship. The incident referred to was in an optional history course, and as far as Pollock's organization knows, it has not been repeated. Nor did the government report on teaching history even come close to suggesting that such courses be dropped to avoid inflaming Muslim sen- sitivities. But the story has legs and thanks to the indiscriminate powers of the Internet, it is still circulating. What is more disturb- ing, though, is how readily the story was accepted as fact. It fit. Magazine articles refer to the British capital as "Londonistan." They talk of the bombing of the Underground last year, the attack on the Glasgow airport and the aforementioned boycotts directed at Israel. All these fed into a perception that Great Britain is increasingly hostile to Jews and furnished the soil for such a story to take root. There is much to be critical of in Britain these days. The crude attempts to smear Israel and cater to Arab policy in the Middle East should be opposed and condemned. But that makes it imperative that critics are sure of their facts. Charging into battle on the basis of rumor is not a policy that bolsters our credibility. II Forever Cheim by Michael Gilbert GERSHON, FOR A GIFT OF 500 KRUSLES W:tU CAN TAKE PART RI OUR ANNUAL, FuND- RAIS(NG DINNER WELL-, THAT'S A LoToF MONeg, RABBI, BUT Z DON'T WANT TO MISS THE DINNER, SO HERE you GO Reality Check Putrid Presidents D onald Trump and some other wealthy dolt were on TV recently delivering themselves of the opinion that George W. Bush is the worst president in American history. Well, I'm sure not here to defend Bush. He finally lost me when he vetoed federal funding for stem cell research and caved in to the holy rollers. But "the worst president?" Now that covers a lot of ground and a lot of likely candidates. There are, for example, Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan, possibly the weak- est of all presidential successions. They twiddled their thumbs and did nothing throughout the 1850s while the nation moved inexorably towards civil war. There is Warren Harding, the greatest argument, along with Benito Mussolini, against ever placing a journalist in charge of anything. An amiable chump, Harding's pals were scoundrels, intent on looting the treasury. Reports persist that his wife poi- soned him, not only for his mar- ital infidelities but because the whole sordid scandal was about to break open. Same scenario, minus the sex, for U.S. Grant. Then there is Richard Nixon, whose undeniable accomplish- ments cannot stand up to the fact that he had to leave in a big hurry. I'd throw Herbert Hoover in there, too, for not being able to grasp the enormity of the Great Depression and puttering along, business as usual. And, of course, Jimmy Carter, who was way out of his depth. As recent events have made clear he would have been out of his depth in a bathtub. Bush certainly will be ranked with these gems, barring a highly unlikely turn- around in Iraq. But stranger things have happened. While we're discussing presidential matters, isn't it odd that Mitt Romney's religion should be emerging as an issue? It genuinely surprised me that so many people regard Mormonism as a danger to the nation. Sure it asks its adherents to believe some implausible things — but no less than a bush burning without being consumed or people coming back from the dead. That is in the nature of religions. It is Romney's bad luck that a cable TV series, Big Love, emphasizes the polyga- mous aspect of his religion. I checked with the authorities in Utah and they assured me that big love is not a big issue anymore. Even if it were, I'd say it's better than unho- ly trysts with interns in the Oval Office. To compound Romney's trouble, there is also the recent release of the movie September Dawn, a recounting of the Mountain Meadows massacre of 1857. Mormons are depicted as wild-eyed zeal- ots who wantonly murdered a band of pioneers and then grabbed their kids for adoption. I researched that crime for one of my books, Bad Guys in American History. Mormons feared that an invasion of Utah by the U.S. Army was imminent. Instructions went out to regard all intrud- ers with suspicion, and a few members of the pioneer wagon train had raided Mormon farms for livestock. One renegade church leader, John D. Lee, decided to take things one step further and retaliated murderously. Lee fled Utah and was later executed for the crime. But 150 years later its shadow has fallen across a presidential campaign. Proving once again, as William Faulkner pointed out, the past is not dead. It isn't even passed. 1-1 George Cantor's e-mail address is gcantor614@aol.com. September 20 • 2007 27