Opinion Editorials are posted and archived on JNonline.us. Greenberq's View p ratiogr,„.. zoos dJ CR Editorial Dubai's Democratic Facade T he theoretical underpinning for the Iraq war is that establish- ment of democratic states in the Middle East would ease regional tensions and alleviate the threat of terrorism. Because democracies don't go to war with each other. It is another tenet of neo-conserva- tism that free markets are a prerequisite for democracy. Capitalism advances free political institutions and this, in turn, would foster a reasonable attitude towards Israel in newly democratized Muslim nations. Many of these ideas went on the rocks in Iraq. But the direct equation of Islamic capitalism with democracy may be more tenuous than anticipated. The real test case is Dubai. This Persian Gulf emirate is going through the big- gest economic spurt in the region. One recent news story described it as "capital- ism gone mad." New office towers and hotels have turned Dubai's main street into a steel canyon and it is now the most populous urban area in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Some commentators compare it to Singapore, the tiny econom- is dynamo in Southeast Asia. All this was punctuated by the recent announcement that Haliburton, a compa- ny with close ties to the Bush administra- tion, was relocating from Texas to Dubai to get where the real action is. So that should be good news for Israel, right? Well, maybe. Dubai seems content to maintain a deliberate air of ambigu- ity about that relationship. It officially subscribes to the Arab boycott of Israeli goods and insists they cannot enter the country. That is one of the reasons a Dubai- based company was denied a contract as supervising agent at several American ports last year. Unofficially, however, there appears to be a back-door agree- ment to allow the passage of such goods, as long as no one kicks up too much of a fuss. Similarly, business travelers are told that if an Israeli stamp appears on their pass- port, they will be denied entry to Dubai. But in almost all cases, such restrictions are ignored. Occasionally, however, they are not and for no apparent reason. Dubai seems determined to keep up 5tevaggreenfrerg-art.com appearances with the rest of the UAE, while signaling Israel with a wink and a nod. That might be construed as encour- aging news if there were also a genuine democratic movement in Dubai. But there is little evidence of that. Neither political parties nor a free press are permitted, and its rulers make sure that they maintain majority control in any elections that are held. Dubai says it has instituted instruc- tion in democracy in its schools as early as the first grade to prepare its citizens for such a form of government at some unspecified future date. But there is no great rush, and it certainly would not be the sort of free-wheeling democracy familiar to Israelis. Dubai says that model may "not be the best fit for our people." That isn't the sort of rhetoric one wants to hear from a state where capitalism is on a roll. But it seems that the anticipated next step may be quite a while in com- ing. wrote in the New Yorker that it was all America's fault anyhow and that its foreign policy had brought about a well-deserved retribution. That's pretty much the position of Clinton's critics, too. Mitt Romney is going through the same sort of thing among the Christian Right. No one can be elected governor of Massachusetts by opposing abortion. So he didn't. Romney was an excellent governor, devising a health care plan that may yet be a model for the other states. He also did nothing to make abortion easier. That's the basis on which he should be judged by pro-life groups — not for tak- ing a foolhardy stance in a general elec- tion. Absolutism doesn't get it done. I have changed my mind on several issues — abortion, legalization of mari- juana, especially capital punishment. I have been writing columns for a long time and if you go back 25 years or so you will have no problem finding one that no longer reflects what I now believe on the death penalty. How can you ignore the accumulating evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, incompetent defense and biased or emo- tional juries, all bolstered by DNA tests? I don't know how you can sustain a belief anymore that the legal system protects the innocent from an unjust capital con- viction. Well, that's fine for an innocuous jour- nalist. But it won't cut it in the political arena. Change your mind on something like this and you'd be cut to shreds. I've also changed my mind about going out and shooting a cow to get milk. I think you should sedate and euthanize them, instead. I I E-mail letters of no more than 150 words to: Ietters@thejewishnews.com. Reality Check How's That Again? W hen I was about 5 years old I wrote a short story about some people stranded on a desert island. They needed milk so they went out and shot a cow. That's why I can never run for public office. Because if I did, in a matter of weeks this ad would appear on televi- sion: "George Cantor believes that the prob- lem of hunger in America can be solved by the wanton slaughter of farm animals. It's all written down in black and white. Call George Cantor at this number and tell him to keep his ignorant hands off Bossy." American politics has become almost that absurd. Put something in writing at any point in your life and you are stuck with it forever. Some weasel in the opposing camp will track it down and plaster it to your image on the Internet. You are not allowed to change your mind or correct a mistake. Ever. That is waffling, indecisiveness, a mark of poor leadership. The possibility of growth, measuring your own beliefs against new information, is not an option in the simple-minded world of gotcha politics. Hillary Clinton asserts, for example, that if she had access to intelligence that came out later, she wouldn't have voted for the Iraq War. That sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Yet the left wing of her party is on her trail, baying like a pack of hounds, demanding that she "apologize" for her vote. This is consistent with the Democratic Party's apparently irrepressible drive to destroy its most electable candidates. The Iraq War is a mess, but let's be clear. Those heckling Hillary wouldn't have voted for any war at any time under any circumstances. They opposed conflict with Afghan- istan, even though it was indisputable that the Taliban regime harbored the terrorists who planned and carried out 9-11. Just days after the attack, the late Susan Sontag George Cantor's e-mail address is gcantor614@aol.com . April 5 • 2007 25