100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

March 15, 2007 - Image 36

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Detroit Jewish News, 2007-03-15

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Opinion

r— )

OTHER VIEWS

e

Point from page 35

ences — day schools, camps, youth
movements and Hillel, Israel travel
and study, and intensive adult educa-
tion — could have twice the impact,
for little extra investment, if they
attracted interfaith families and their
children.

On the Boardwalk

248-626-7776

Boston Model
The timing of Cohen's paper is par-
ticularly unfortunate because after
the recent finding that 60 percent of
Boston's interfaith families are raising
their children as Jews, policymakers
and funders have a very clear road to
follow to get these results everywhere:
• Fund Reform's outreach staff and
programming, as the Boston federa-
tion does and foundations do in San
Francisco. Every Union for Reform
Judaism regional office could have a
substantial outreach effort.
• Back the efforts of Rabbi Charles
Simon's Federation of Jewish Men's
Clubs and its pioneering kiruv work
in the Conservative movement.
• Spur the JCC world to explicitly
communicate the message that the
JCCs welcome everyone in the Jewish

Thursday, March 22
I0am - 6pm

Friday, March 23
I0am 6pm

Saturday, March 24
I0am Spm

community, including interfaith fami-
lies, and to have at least a part-time
professional devoted to offering out-
reach programs in the JCCs.
• Support independent outreach
organizations. Fund more evaluations
of the impact of outreach programs.
The Jewish community has an
opportunity to make this the best of
times. Seeing intermarried families
as a separate, inferior portion of our
population, as Cohen does, leads to a
dead-end; intermarried families, like
anyone else, will not affiliate with a
group that demeans them and offers
little programming to welcome them.
The key to Boston's successful
targeting of interfaith families is not
the actual outreach programs; those
flowed from a communal choice to
adopt a welcoming and inclusive atti-
tude toward interfaith families and to
respond to intermarriage positively.
Which shall we be: two Jewries or
one?

Edmund Case is the president and publish-

er of Interfaithfamily.com . Michah Sachs is

its online managing editor.

Counterpoint from page 35

4 Days Only March 15-18

30-75% OFF

Everything
in our Gift Department

LO

36

8tUCITO8

March 15 2007

Fine Designer Furniture m Stunning Accessories
Unique & Unusual Gifts
6644 Orchard Lake Road just S of Maple
West Bloomfield m248 855.1600
Mon & Thur 10-9 * Tue-Wed-Fri-Sat 10-6 I Sun 11-4

22921 0

few years, there's nothing new here. It
simply reminds us that intermarriages
continue to grow in number; that most
intermarried couples raise non-Jewish
children; and that the children of the
intermarried overwhelmingly marry
non-Jews.
However, Jewish education — e.g.,
day schools, youth groups, Jewish
camps, Israel trips — lowers intermar-
riage. So does Jewish association, such
as experienced by living in Jewish areas,
attending universities with large Jewish
student bodies and participating in
Jewish cultural events, spiritual com-
munities and social justice activities.
I also highlight the growing con-
viction that we have to do better at
promoting conversion, making conver-
sion the ultimate objective of outreach
efforts.
"A Tale of Two Jewries" is an advo-
cacy piece. It was not written for the
intermarried or as a guide for how to
engage with the intermarried. Neither
was it written in the cautionary style
favored by the academy.
It is meant to communicate. It is
meant for the Jewish policymaking

community — the philanthropists, the
federations and other agencies that are
making critical funding decisions.
It says intermarriage poses a grave
threat to the numbers of communally
identifying Jews. But it also says that
you can make a difference.
You can invest in Jewish education.
You can support growing efforts by
Jewish young people in social justice,
culture and spiritual communities.
You can launch experiments to convert
more non-Jews to Judaism, such as by
paying for community rabbis dedi-
cated to helping prospective converts
embark upon Jewish journeys. You can
do all this and more.
Or you can watch the Jewish popula-
tion start to contract as my generation
of baby boomers begins leaving this
world for the next, to be replaced — or
not — by a numerically much smaller
cohort of Jewish descendants. The
choice is yours. I

Steven M. Cohen is a professor of Jewish
social policy at the Reform movement's

Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of
Religion in New York.

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan