Front Lines POINT - COUNTERPOINT The Topic: Is Israel a Western-style Democracy? Deviations Aside It's Democratic I s Israel a Western-style democracy? My answer is yes. Democracy, in the origi- nal sense, is government by the majority or by the representatives of the majority The will of the majority is determined by free elections in which every adult is free to vote. Israel is certainly a democracy, since there are free elections in which both Jews and Arabs are free to vote. The problem with democracy is that the majority may choose to abuse minorities and to abuse individuals whose opinions and lifestyle may deviate from the norm. The tyranny of public opin- ion can be as awful as the tyranny - of an autocrat. Western-style democracy lim its the power of the majority. It requires liberalism, a defense of personal freedom and individual rights. Majorities are forbidden to interfere with the individual cit- izen'sright to choose his spouse, his work, his residence; his reli- gion — even his sexual behavior ber of a nationality, much like the so long as the public welfare is not English and French in Canada. harmed. Liberal democra- In an age of mixed cies shrink the tyranny of populations, the national- the majority. ity model is gradually The problem with clas- intruding on the old clas- sical liberalism is that it sical model in Western ignores nationality. Every countries. France, with individual is treated only its refusal to recognize as an individual, never as ethnic minorities, is one a member of an ethnic of the last adamant Sherwin Wine group. For classical holdouts. liberals, there are only Israel is a Western- "Americans." There are style democracy because no African Americans, Hispanic there are high levels of personal Americans or Jewish Americans. freedoms, even for many of the In recent years, America has devi- Arabs. But it is imperfect. While ated from the classic model. We the law is egalitarian, theimple-• now make a distinction between mentation of the law is not. Jews, citizenship and nationality, pro- per capita, receive much more viding protection and privilege to state aid than the Arabs. racial and ethnic groups. Since military service is the Israel does not conform to the basis for many benefits, the Arab classical model. It recognizes exemption from military service two major nationalities in Israel: limits access to government help. Jewish and Arab. And Arab Since Arabs are often viewed as nationality is subdivided into enemy sympathizers, their lives Muslim and Christian categories. are under continuous surveillance Every Israeli citizen is not only a and restriction. The same abuses, citizen; he or she is also a mem- to a lesser degree, now exist for Muslims, in both North America and Western Europe. A Notable Merger Israel deviates from Western= style democracy in one impor- tant area..It merges religion and nationality It has turned over the administration of Jewish national identity to the Orthodox rabbinate. That is the equivalent of turning Irish identity over. to the Roman Catholic clergy. In addition, Israel subsidizes Orthodoxy while it refuses legiti- macy to the clergy of other Jewish denominations. When it comes to marriage and divorce, Jewish freedom is greatly curtailed. All Jews must conform to the require- ments of Orthodoxy, even secular Jews. England features an established church, which its government pays for. But it does not force people of English nationality to accept its jurisdiction. Israel is a Jewish state because its primary nationality is Jewish and because its primary language is Hebrew. It is Jewish in the same way that Italy is Italian or Spain is Spanish. The fact that Basques and Catalans live in Spain, and are registered as Spanish citizens, does not diminish the reality that the Spanish are the primary nationality of Spain. The "rub" is that in order to join the Jewish nationality you now have to choose a religion as well. The Jews did not invent either democracy or liberal democ- racy. They learned it from the Western Europeans. Israel, with all it deviations, is a child of that experiment. i Sherwin T. Wine is founding rabbi of the Farmington Hills-based Birmingham Temple, organized in 1963 as the first congregation of Humanistic Judaism serving as a national outreach of the Humanistic movement. In 1986, he helped cre- ate the International Federation of Secular Humanistic Jews. His books include "Judaism Beyond God" and "Staying Sane In a Crazy World." It's Democratic To A Degree Counterpoint T radition identifies Western-style democ- racy as any rule by rep- resentative government. This view rests on the traditional theory of sovereignty that deems the people sovereign, namely, rulers. Presumably, the people elect del- egates to act for them. COU nter-examples to this theory would be free universal elections for non-democratic gov- ernments. The recent elections in Iraq and in Palestine are such. Increasingly, tradition gives way to the view of democracy as democratic control, as the right of the people to get rid of their rulers by elections and by other means, such as impeachment (Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, 1945). This is admi- rable on account of its expression of a liberal sentiment without the traditional fiction of government by the people. . .- - It takes account of the possibility of the absence of proper candidates for leadership: democracy may fail, and at times it does. As Israel has elections in a manner acceptable to Westerners, by the tra- Joseph ditional view it is clearly no less democratic than France, but the same goes for even worse cases like Iraq. Israel resembles Iraq in its refusal to separate church and state so as to be able to maintain legally blatant discrimination against non-Jewish citizens, not to mention the continued occu- pation under religious pretexts that many non-practicing Jews endorse (which provides a bonus for any Israeli Jew to join religious practices of the sect that possess- es state monopoly over Judaism). style democracy as the modern-style liberal nation-state. Here, Israel fails just like Iraq and the Palestinian Authority (and India and Pakistan and more), and for the same reason: they all fail Agassi to recognize their own nations, as they prefer to recognize national minorities and discriminate against them. Here, liberal philosophy is not of much use although it condemns the discrimination, traditionally it does not recognize the nation except as a collection of citizens, thus ignoring the obsta- des on the way to amalgamate the diverse groups into a national unity. The founding fathers of the United States paid no attention to national unity. This came up in the famous Federalist Papers and later in the Civil War. Liberal Nation-State Today, many American intd- Tradition also identifies WeStern- . lectuals do not deem themselves members of a nation. President Ronald Reagan, not the profound- est thinker among American presidents, knew better: address- ing the people of New York on the occasion of its 200th birthday, he appealed to its Jewish and black Communities to remember that they belong to the one nation. Here, there may be some confu- sion since the West recognizes and nurtures cultural and religious and other minorities but not .national ones; In 19th century Europe, diverse Jewish leaders (including scholar Leopold Zunz and writer-publicist Peretz Smolenskin) demanded cultural autonomy for the Jewish communities. Nationalist philoso- phy then had turned illiberal and supportive of homogeneity in the name of national cohesion. This proved disastrous for Jews who stayed in Europe. Well before that, this was an incentive for the rise of Jewish nationalism that culminated with the rise of the Zionist movement and the foundation of Israel. The movement aimed at the noiinal- ization of the Jewish people, where normalization as understood to be following the Western-style lib- eral democratic way. In this, Israel has failed. Normal life requires the struggle against discrimination. No country is free of it. And so, democracy is no longer to be viewed as black-and-white char- acterization; it is matter of degree. Israel will be moredemocratic if it finds a ivay to reduce its dis- crimination against its non-Jewish citizens. 7 Joseph Agassi is professor emeritus of philosophy at Tel Aviv University and York University in Toronto. He has published 20 books and 400 contributions to the learned press. The Hebrew versions of his book "Liberal Nationalism for Israel: Toward an Israeli National Identity" appeared in 1983 and 1993. The English version: of the book was published in 1999. May 4 • 2006 11