• Opinion Editorials are posted and archived on JNonline.us . Approach It Intelligently M ore than 200 years ago, philosophers came up with the concept of a Divine watch- maker. Just as the complexity of a watch implies that someone must have designed and made it, they argued, a complex universe indicates there must have been a Creator. Even though it has been refut- ed many times as a flawed anal- ogy, the watchmaker theory has been kicking around for a couple of centuries. Only now it's called intelligent design. Just as its original formula- tors were trying to reconcile the unsettling ideas of the Enlightenment with belief in a Supreme Being, today's advocates say they only want to bring sci- ence and religion into harmony. Especially when it comes to teaching the theory of evolution. A federal judge ruled last year, however, that the Dover, Pa., school board could not mandate the teaching of intelligent design in its biology classes because it was not provable, had no basis in science and was, in fact, a reli- gious belief. It was simply anoth- er way of prying the school door open to creationism, or belief in the literal truth of the opening chapter of Genesis. It was a hard-fought trial, with the sort of examination that was characterized in a New Yorker article, as "cheerful merciless- ness."When the decision came down, though, Dover abided by the ruling and also voted out of office the school board members who had sponsored intelligent design. Still, its advocates in the Michigan Legislature appear to be trying to get around this legal problem by presenting the teaching of intelligent design as an exercise in academic rigor. A House bill on educational reform sets new guidelines for course content in public high schools. This bill overall contains some positive developments for education in Michigan. But the language in its science section needs to be clarified or amended. It stipulates that science classes would "critically evaluate scien- tific-theories ... and formulate arguments for and against those theories." No description of any other course contains language that so explicitly encourages challenges to a generally accepted system of knowledge. So it is not unreason- able to suspect that the scientific theory this bill's supporters are particularly eager to challenge is that of Charles Darwin. Intelligent design based on complexity theory does have interesting aspects for those who try to reconcile science and faith. If they want to believe it privately and in the places they worship, that's their absolute right. But it should not be presented in schools as an alternative — and the only alternative — to the Origin of Species and evolu- tion. ❑ Dry Bones AND MAMAS REJECTS A TWO STATE SOLUTION! WOW! MAMAS REJECTS THE OSLO ACCORDS! A LOT LIKE SHARON'S ONCE WAS,/ THE MAMAS POSITION IS NOW 7 E-mail letters of no more than 150 words to: letters@thejewishnews. corn WWW.DRYBONESBLOG.BLOGSPOT.COM Reality Check It's A Puzzlement A few simple questions I have a hard time get- ting answered: Do Palestinian Christians believe they're still in the game now that Hamas has been voted into control of their presump- tive homeland? When I asked a local Palestinian apologist about Muslim extremism a few years ago, she responded that she'd worry about that when the time came. I'd say the time has come. Did declining television rat- ings mean that Americans have grown bored with the Olympics? Or did it simply mean they rejected NBC's pre-digested pap that kept flitting mindlessly from one event to the other? Given the choice between that and American Idol ... well, maybe I wouldn't go that far. Let's see. Four major Oscars in the last two years have gone to actors portraying Ray Charles, Katherine Hepburn, June Carter Cash and Truman Capote. Does this mean that Rich Little will be up for an Academy Award soon? Those were won- derful stories about the new housing planned for Detroit's east riverfront. Unfortunately, you had to read way down in the fine print to learn that the funding is not yet in place. Now where have I heard that before? Oh, yeah. Maybe in about two dozen other projects in the city. Fast-food restaurants flocked to put "healthy choice" selec- tions on their menus a few years ago. Unfortunately, a recent report indi- cates that hardly anyone is choosing them. Fruits and veg- gies are rotting in storage. So does this mean that "public interest" lawyers will agree that these res- taurants made a good faith effort and can now discontinue the items as a rational market decision without fearing future lawsuits? I know, I know. I just can't help being silly sometimes. Can anyone tell me exactly what "public interest" means? My accountant says that if the typical crowd at Comerica Park were given a vote, 80 percent would say they'd rather be at Tiger Stadium. Is he wrong? Why is the United States regarded as malicious for want- ing to tighten security on its southern border with Mexico when Mexico has even more rig- orous restrictions on its southern border with Guatemala? Why did so many people who now compare Israel's security fence to the Berlin Wall have nothing to say about the original Berlin Wall when it was standing? How can the United States be engaged in nation-building in Iraq? To do that, don't you have to start off with something like a nation? Iraq is lines arbitrarily drawn on a map by the Allies after World War I and populated by groups of people who detest each other. Couldn't someone have figured that out before all the jubilant pre-war forecasts? Will the cartoon riots finally iN lift the blindfold from the eyes of the European Union? Last year it rejected a report that Muslim groups were behind much of the anti-Semitic violence in Europe. Now maybe they understand that it's not only Jews for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for their free- doms, too. How can anyone feel confident about Democrats picking up seats in this fall's congressional elections when Howard Dean is leading the party? This is like signing up for a walking tour of Grand Canyon led by a lemming. And could I still write a col- umn if someone swiped the ? key from my word processor? Li George Cantor's e-mail address is gcantor614@aol.com. March 16 G 2006 39