World Divesting Faith Protestant drive to divest from Israel threatens interfaith ties. RACHEL POMERANCE Jewish Telegraphic Agency New York City s a growing number of Protestant churches consider imposing economic sanctions against Israel, the American Jewish community is threatening to abandon interfaith dialogue with mainstream Protestant groups. "Any Protestant denomination that would consider the weapon of econom- ic sanctions to be unilaterally and prej- udicially used against the State of Israel, or those who would hold the State of Israel to a standard different from any other sovereign state, creates an envi- ronment which makes constructive dia- logue almost impossible," mainstream Jewish defense groups and the three main religious streams wrote in an April 22 letter to Protestant leaders. The letter is considered the strongest language that Jewish groups have used to date on the issue. The letter "signals a change in the tone and the tenor of our discourse," said Ethan Felson, assistant executive director of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs. The missive comes after a flurry of recent activity by churches considering divestment some nine months after a Protestant group first made it a promi- nent issue. That was last summer, when the Presbyterian Church USA passed a resolution considering a "selective, phased divestment" of com- panies that do business with Israel. The resolution shocked Jewish offi- cials, who in reaction scurried to step up interfaith relations. But it also cre- ated a point of departure for other A Sharansky Quits Israeli Government DAN BARON Jewish Telegraphic Agency Jerusalem orever the rebel with a cause, Soviet-refusenik-turned- democracy-proponent Natan Sharansky has left the Israeli govern- ment rather than take part in the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. Sharansky tendered his resignation as diaspora affairs minister Monday, Protestant denominations to mull divestment as a way, they believe, to promote Mideast peace. In November 2004, the board of the Episcopal Church voted to consider corporate actions against companies that "contribute to the infrastructure of Israel's ongoing occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip," along with companies that "have connec- tions to organizations responsible for violence against Israel." "The emphasis of this process is not likely to be divestment," according to Maureen Shea, the church's director of government relations. Two weeks ago, the board of the United Methodist Church voted to conduct a yearlong study to consider divestment. Last week, the United Church of Christ released resolutions it will consider at its annual conference in Atlanta in July; two suggest divest- ment, while one urges Israel to dis- mantle its West Bank security barrier. In a move Jewish groups consider positive, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America voted last week for constructive investment" to partner with Israeli and Palestinian organiza- tions that promote peace. The Protestant pursuit of divest- ment is not limited to America: The Geneva-based World Council of Churches, a predominantly European consortium, passed a resolution in February encouraging churches to fol- low the initiative of the Presbyterian Church USA and consider divesting from Israel. The council has member churches around the world. Many of the North American groups consider- ing divestment are affiliated with it. Many Jewish observers have been " stunned by the swirl of activity. "I think it's one of the stranger things I've seen," said David Elcott, U.S. director of interreligious affairs for the American Jewish Committee. "I don't understand why this issue would come up now," when Israel is taking steps for peace with the Palestinians. Elcott said the Jewish community has been "incredibly consistent" in maintaining interfaith dialogue since the Presbyterian move. Jewish officials cite several reasons for the divestment trend in the Protestant community: • Protestant churche's are responding to Palestinian Christians and their supporters, who believe sanctions will force Israel to make concessions and will help the Christians' standing with Palestinian Muslims. Churches in the region have sent representatives to American churches to tell of Israel's alleged injustices against Palestinian Christians. Meanwhile, U.S. church groups that have visited the region hear a prim ari- ly anti-Israel narrative. • Some feel Jewish groups have lagged in their maintenance of interfaith work. While Palestinian supporters are advo- cating their view, "we have not done a very good job of going into churches and advocating a counter point of view," said Rabbi Gary Bretton- Granatoor, director of interfaith affairs for. the Anti-Defamation League. In addition, interfaith dialogue has focused on what binds the faiths, not what divides them, said Bretton- Granatoor. As a result, Protestants and Jews have not fully explored each other's views on the Middle East. "We have never stopped thinking about Israel as the very center of our _ May 2, accusing the Sharon govern- adamantly opposed." ment of failing to demand Palestinian Sharon, who lost two right-wing reform as a prerequisite to peace coalition partners and a moves. Cabinet member from his own 'As you know, I have opposed Likud Party last year over the the disengagement plan from plan to withdraw this summer the beginning, on the grounds from Gaza and the northern that I believe any concessions in West Bank, took Sharansky's the peace process must be Shara nsky walkout in stride. He voiced linked to democratic reforms regret at the decision and within Palestinian society," thanked Sharansky for "com- Sharansky wrote in an open let- bating anti-Semitism the world ter to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. "I over." It was not immediately clear who no longer feel that I can faithfully serve in a government whose central would inherit the diaspora affairs policy — indeed, sole raison d'etre — portfolio. In any event, Sharansky pledged in his letter, "I will continue has become one to which I am so faith, but the Christians don't under- stand it," he said. "To them, our attachment to Israel is 19th century colonialism." • Many mainstream Protestant churches; which skew to the left, sub- scribe to a world view called "libera- tion theology." They aim to uplift the "weak and the downtrodden" and they believe that the Palestinians fill that role, said Rabbi Irving Greenberg, president of Jewish Life Network/ Steinhardt Foundation. Other Christian denominations have a different perspective. Evangelicals subscribe to a Christian Zionist ideology, which calls for the ingathering of Jews to Israel as a pre- cursor of Armageddon. Because Catholics are represented by the Vatican, they have diplomatic rela- tions to make their case, and Catholic- Jewish relations are relatively strong. Last year, the Vatican issued a joint statement with Jewish officials calling anti-Zionism anti-Semitism. Jewish groups aim to continue engaging the Protestant community on grass-roots and national levels and are seeking voices within the churches to oppose divestment. A coalition of Jews and Protestants will meet May 13. in Washington, and an interfaith mis- sion to Israel is planned for September. "We have had our fingers crossed and we had done our work pretty well, I thought;" said Mark Pelavin, associate director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism. But "it appears that we're going to have to have a broader conversation, denomi- DIVESTING FAITH on page 28 my lifelong efforts to contribute to the unity and strength of the Jewish people both in Israel and in the dias- pora." By quitting the Cabinet, Sharansky effectively finds himself outside of Israeli politics, because he does not hold a Knesset seat. But his shift to private citizen seemed to many to be a natural move for the author of the recent best-seller The Case for Democracy, which U.S. President George Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice publicly praised. The Jerusalem Post speculated that Sharansky would focus on promoting the book. 5/5 2005 27