Citizens' Army Resonates Jerusalem oday, most Americans' knowl- edge of war is second hand, culled from television, news- papers, films and the occasional book. The Israeli experience could not be more different: The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is a citizens' army, corn- prised primarily of 18- to 21-year-olds performing their mandatory service and reservists on active duty until age 36. With the exception of limited numbers of ultra-Orthodox students and those deemed physically or psy- chologically unfit, all Israeli Jews are expected to serve. Indeed, along with voting, speaking Hebrew, and keeping abreast of the news, army service has always been a crucial part of Israeli society — a basic component of "Israeliness." The nature of the IDF, then, makes it nearly impossible to imagine a sce- nario in which, should Israel's exis- tence once again be threatened by a coalition of hostile armies, a majority of Israelis remain at home, watching the conflict unfold on TV. Yet this is precisely the scenario envisioned by some Israeli experts, who have recent- ly proposed abandoning the notion of a citizens' army altogether. They suggest that Israel phase out the draft, deploy professional troops, and outsource logistical support — food, supplies and transportation — T Michael Oren, who served as a para- trooper in the Israeli army, is a senior fellow at the Shalem Center in Jerusalem. A longer version of this article appears in the current issue of Azure www.azure.org.il reserve duty had been phased to international security out, Israel would find itself at corporations. a loss to meet the challenge: This scenario would have Re-imposing conscription is been unthinkable during the politically difficult in a first five decades of Israel's democracy, and rebuilding a existence, when the IDF was competent reserve force viewed as both the guarantor takes time. of the country's physical sur- Moreover, the picture of vival and a central pillar of the MICHAEL Israelis' willingness to serve is Zionist mission of empower- OREN more complex than is often ing the Jewish people. Over Special the last decade, however, the Commentary thought. At the beginning of Operation Defensive Shield ideological foundation of the in April 2002, for example, IDF — and, with it, Israelis' the response to the reserve call-up willingness to serve — has been erod- exceeded 100 percent; even those no ed by the divisive conflicts in Lebanon longer on active-reserve rosters and the territories, increasing numbers reported for duty. The reason is clear: of exemptions granted to religious stu- A citizens' army has much more at dents, and Israel's cultural shift from stake in maintaining the nation's collectivism to individualism. security and will bring far more The nature of warfare — and of motivation to the battlefield when Israel's enemies — has also changed. the country is attacked. A profession- Following the elimination of Saddam al force cannot be expected to defend Hussein's Iraqi army, the aging of the country with the selfless passion Syria's arsenal, and peace treaties with that carried the IDF to victory in Egypt and Jordan, the immediate peril 1948, 1967 and 1973 and which to Israel's security now comes from more recently has battled Palestinian terrorist cells in the West Bank and terrorism. Gaza and Tehran's missiles. As a result, fewer than 60 percent of today's eligi- Military Melting Pot ble Israelis complete their mandatory But beyond strategic damage, propos- military service, and only 12 percent als to do away with the citizens' army do reserve duty. pull hard at one of the pillars of Israeli Yet calls to do away with the citi- democracy. The classic image of the zen's army are breathtakingly short- IDF as "melting pot" is far more true sighted. This is, after all, the Middle than is fashionable to believe, as evi- East: It does not take much imagina- denced by the mass absorption of Jews tion to envision a sudden change in from Ethiopia and the former Soviet the region — an Islamic revolution in Union in the last decade. Egypt, for example — which would Indeed, more than any Western once again place massive, hostile country, Israel is threatened by the divisions on Israel's borders. If that sheer size and diversity of its immi- were to happen, for example, after grant communities, and only the IDF has proven strong enough to counter- balance this force. In an otherwise polarized society, the army is the one place in which Israelis from all walks of life — reli- gious and secular, dove and hawk, rich and poor — join in common cause. Finally, the continuous flow of civilians into the ranks of the IDF helps prevent the emergence of a military caste whose values might not reflect those of society at large. The ability of the IDF to display unusual levels of sensitivity to civilian casualties throughout nearly six decades of almost uninterrupted war- fare is due in large measure to its character as a citizens' army. These concerns may not be decisive in other Western societies. But for the Jewish state, a citizens' army is indispensable. After nearly 2,000 years of statelessness, the Jews' hard-won ability to defend them- selves represents nothing less than a return to an active role in history. Israel should think twice before relinquishing that role. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Likud party who oppose his plans to with- draw from the Gaza Strip, even though a majorit-y of Israelis and Israel's military establi,shment sup- port the move. A historical look at Likud party- ideology explains why. EMEND 'Y EE ISSUE future in a democratic way. Outside the country, good things are happening. The U.N. has been shown up for what it is: the biggest obstacle to peace in the world. Thanks to members of the U.S. Congress, the oil-for-food scandal will not go away. The millions diverted to support suicide bombers will make it difficult for the U.N. Secretary- General Kofi Annan — the do-noth- ing who watches millions dying in Darfur at the hands of roving Arab murderers out to steal the land of black Africans — will soon join the list of the unemployed. In Iraq, democratic elections are under way, showing the entire Islamic world that they don't have to live under murderous dictatorships that steal their country's resources and pro- vide heartbreak and poverty and fear in exchange. We could have gone the appeasement way, the way of Germany and France, but we didn't. Americans decided the fate of the world not by a narrow margin but by millions of votes to stay the course. And although it was the Republicans they voted for, what they were sup- porting was a cherished American ideal that the Democratic Party once epitomized. After the Pearl Harbor attack, (in which there were fewer deaths than in the Sept. 11 attack) America decided to take away the security of the Japanese enemy that their cities and people were too far away to experience any retaliation. Within two months of Pearl Harbor, the U.S. bombed Japan. But wars don't last forever, and nei- ther does violence and bloodshed. I have hope that our determination to win this fight against the enemies of mankind will result in a peaceful world for our children and grandchil- dren. A new wind is blowing, and there is reason to hope in the air — for everyone. Former Israeli Minister of Justice and Likud party leader Dan Meridor explained recently that Sharon's plan is the result of a stark choice by officials to abandon a key party tenet. Party leaders realized that their historic Jewish claim to all of the West Bank and their com- mitment to a democratic society with a Jewish majority could both not be maintained in the face of a growing Arab population in Gaza and the West Bank which is denied Israeli citizenship. Allan Gale, Jewish Community Council of Metropolitan Detroit 12/17 2004 35