OTHER VIEWS Where Idealism Works 0 ne would forgive Natan Sharansky, the former Soviet dissident and political prisoner, if he suffered from a degree of cyni- cism and pessimism. Nine years in a Soviet prison could make one look at life through dark lenses, decrying mankind and the innate evil of the human spirit. Yet, Sharansky proves once more, as he did in his memoirs, Fear No Evil, that he remains an optimist, under- standing and preaching the value of democracy and freedom to the future of the world. His latest book, The Case for Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome ijiranny 6 Terror should be required reading not only in schools and universities, but also for any pub- lic official who aspires to office any- where in the world. With logic and passion, Sharansky, currently Israel's minister for Jerusalem and diaspora affairs, makes the case that democracy and freedom will always defeat tyranny. A free soci- ety is inherently stronger than what he calls a "fear society" and it is a les- son not yet learned by the world's decision makers. Some may call Sharansky, who has held a number of positions in Israel's government, including deputy prime minister, idealistic in a world that often, if not always, works on the principle of realpolitik. But it is Bed Falbaum, author and former polit- ical reporter, is a Farmington Hills pub- lic relations executive and teaches jour- nalism part time at Wayne State University in Detroit. realpolitik and not idealism that is at fault. With devastating analysis, he takes to task former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger for his policy of detente (a "foolish and misguided policy"), which held that it was in the interest of the U.S. to work coopera- tively with Russia, then the only other superpower in the world. Sharansky chides President George H. Bush for refusing to pressure Russia on human rights in exchange for what the former president viewed as political stability. He takes on expert after expert who maintained that Russia could not be toppled by urging or forcing it to change its internal policies. Some of these experts, including the late Arkansas Sen. J. William Fulbright, a foreign relations expert, predicted only months before its demise that the Soviet Union would continue to thrive. One of his heroes, understandably, is the late Washington Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson, whose Jackson- Vanik amendment linked most- favored-nation status, under which countries received preferential terms of trade with America, to a foreign government's protection of its citizens' right to emigrate. It came at a time when the Soviet Union had slammed shut its doors to Russian Jews who wanted to immigrate to Israel. Jackson helped expose the weakness- es of the Soviet Union and it was President Reagan, he writes, who with his uncompromising pressure on Russia — which included defense buildups — that applied the fatal blow. Take On Tyrants to countries that have never known it. But Sharansky's overall "Worse," he writes, "the message is that the world has failure to exercise that power always made a mistake in undermines the cause of free- placating dictators when these dom." tyrants should be challenged Citing the failure of Israel whenever and wherever they to achieve peace with the assume power. BERL Palestinians, Sharansky "A country that does not FAL BAUM applies the same principle, respect the rights of its own stating that from Oslo to Community people will not respect the Camp David, negotiators Perspective rights of its neighbors," like Dennis Ross (whom he Sharansky writes, quoting his calls a friend) failed to mentor Andrei Sakharov. demand that Palestinian He proves his point by pointing not leader Yasser Arafat reform his govern- only to Russia, which ultimately col- ment, but instead always worked to lapsed, but also Hitler's Germany and strengthen him. other despotic governments that ulti- No one, whether the Israeli govern- mately failed when challenged by free- ment was headed by Rabin, Netanyahu, dom and democracy. Barak, Peres, or Sharon, demanded that He also has little patience for those Arafat improve the lives of his own peo- who argue that some countries, given ple before negotiating peace. their history, are simply not ready for The irony in this is that Sharansky democracy or freedom. Given their is considered by many on the Left as histories, democracy or freedom can- a hard-line conservative although not be imposed on these people, the he espouses policies and beliefs of a skeptics maintain. human rights advocate . that would Naysayers Wrong improve the lives of the Palestinians. Sharansky's case is clear, incisive Sharansky writes the pessimists did and strong. It is, obviously, timely not believe that democracy would not only because of the Iraq War work in post-war Japan or Germany but also because of issues relating or such former Communist countries to North Korea, China and the as Czechoslovakia but he said the Arab world. naysayers were wrong. Is Sharansky a bit too idealistic? Further, he argues there are many - Perhaps. who believe that democracy cannot and But given the choice between free- should not be imposed on Arab nations dom and democracy or policies of that have no history of freedom. detente which, at times, support man's Those skeptics who maintain that a inhumanity to man, the decisions fear society cannot be changed into a free society underestimate the power of those in power should make seems all the free world to help bring democracy to obvious. 1-1 The fight is not over by a long shot, but that doesn't mean we can't feel joy about a year in which the deadly head of Hamas, paraplegic baby-killer Sheik Yassin was blown to bits and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, the father of terrorism, died in a French hospital. Yay! The season has changed to a season of hope. The winter rains have begun to fall in abundance, watering our grape vines, our olive, date, pomegranate, apple, plum and almond trees — promising a summer of cool, delicious fruits. Our hotels are full of tourists again and our economy is Shimon Peres and a former climbing out of the doldrums. prime minister, the much There is still too much despised Ehud Barak, at each poverty, too many unem- other's throats. This gives me ployed and too many poor hope that the architects of children, especially in Oslo, who have never taken Jerusalem. There is still politi- responsibility for using cal turmoil over Prime Israelis as laboratory rats for a Minister Ariel Sharon's disen- dangerous experiment that NA OMI gagement plan that would resulted in a thousand dead RAG EN destroy decades of construc- and thousands more horribly Spe cial tion as well as government- injured, may soon be relegat- Comm entary sponsored and encouraged set- ed to history books where tlement activity in Gush Katif and they can do no more harm. other Jewish areas. Hopefully, there will be new elections But politically, the Left is in where the people of Israel can make disarray, the Labor Party stalwarts like the important decisions about their Season Of Hope Jerusalem oming back from a long trip allows you the distance you need to view things more objectively. I returned to an Israel of bandaged wounds that are beginning to heal. Arafat is dead and that in itself is a cause for celebration. Like the Munchkins, we are happy to get rid of the wicked witch, even though other wicked witches remain (Hamas, Islamic Jihad, PLO, Tanzim). C Naomi Ragen is a New York City author who made aliyah in 1972. Her e-mail address is nragen@netvision.net.il 12/17 2004 34