Who's Up, Who's Down Charity list shows Jewish community's fund raising generally is stable. RACHEL POMERANCE Jewish Telegraphic Agency New York snapshot of some of the largest Jewish charities reveals that Jewish fund-raising generally is stable. But nuances in the numbers reveal who's up, who's down and why. The Chronicle of Philanthropy last week released its annual list of the top 400 charities in America primarily for fiscal years that ended in 2003. The 24 American Jewish charities that made the "Philanthropy 400" list raised more than $2 billion from private sources. That was some $42 million less than the total raised in fiscal year 2002 by the 28 Jewish charities on last year's list. First among the Jewish charities was the United Jewish Communities, the umbrella group for North American Jewish federations, with nearly $345 million in private donations. However, since the UJC represents the federations and the funds they raise, much of that amount essentially was double counted. Of its $345 million, $233 million was collected by federations for the system's overseas partners, which run relief and welfare, Zionist education and immigra- tion to Israel. The remaining $112 mil- lion is for the federation system's coordi- nated Israel Emergency Campaign, which was launched in 2001 to aid Israelis amid the Palestinian intifada. While federations raised much of those funds in fiscal year 2002, most were not transferred to UJC until fiscal year 2003. That explains why this year's list shows a bump in fund raising for the UJC but a dip for many of the federa- tions, many of which already had listed the money in fiscal year 2002. The American Jewish community val- ues the Chronicle's list because it provides an opportunity to assess the health of their charitable organizations in compar- ison to each other, the non-Jewish com- munity and years past. But the list is not foolproof For one, it doesn't consider endow- ments or planned giving, many of which are mainstays of Jewish organizations. It also leaves out donations to synagogues, Jewish community centers and day schools, which boast massive capital campaigns, said Gary Tobin, president of the Institute of Jewish and A Community Research. Since most of the Jewish philanthro- pies that made the list are federations, which have flat campaigns, Jewish phi- lanthropy appears flat overall — but in fact it is growing, Tobin said. Mark Charendoff, president of the Jewish Funders Network, believes Jewish fund raising generally is stable — but that's not good enough, he says. "The needs are becoming more acute," he said, "and if the Jewish community wants to have a greater impact in fulfill- ing our mission, then stability is not going to allow us to do the job." "Younger philanthropists view them- selves as investors. This is not a genera- tion that is looking to invest in static" charities, he said. They're "looking to take some risks, educated risks, but risks" in charities "that are taking risks." Topping the general list of 400, by a landslide, was the Salvation Army. With some $1.3 billion raised, the group was half a million dollars ahead of the No. 2 charity, the American Cancer Society. Federations and federation-related agencies make up more than half the Jewish charities listed. That underscores the federations' pre-eminence in American Jewish communal life despite increasing competition — from both Jewish and non-Jewish charities — for donors' money. At the same time, Jewish federations primarily push a collective funding pool, despite a general philanthropic trend to give donors greater control over how their dollars are used. In analyzing the "Philanthropy 400," it becomes clear that a group's ranking and the funds it raises may shift from year to year due to general economic conditions or even a single exceptional donation. Often, it relates to the timing of a special fund-raising drive, as was the case for the federation system's Israel Emergency Campaign. Such a scenario boosted Hadassah: The Women's Zionist Organization of America in this year's listing. The group's fund-raising jumped from some $75 million in 2002 to $94 million in 2003 due to a campaign to build a new emer- gency medical center in Jerusalem, said Jane Karlin, Hadassah's director of devel- opment. "This campaign, which had a $46 million goal, motivated our members CHRONICLE OF PHILANTHROPY 400 Jewish Charities 2003 Ranking Wad Jewish Cornmonftles WIVNWr,W''Vg' 4'.4;MP* American Jewish Joint Difttributiork (OTT.{' WA FedentitiOn at New York - S 167772A00 Jewish Fedecatiotinkited hand of Atetoopolitan Chicago American Mends of tlinfiromity across the United States to give gener- ously," she said, noting that the group had raised $51 million for the project by May 2004. Some, like the Jewish National Fund, lost their place on the list entirely. Last year, the group's nearly $30 million put it at 392nd place; while it topped $30 million in fiscal 2003, it didn't make the current list. The American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science saw its funds slip from nearly $65 million in 2002, when it received a few major gifts, to more than $47 million last year. Others made the list for the first time. The New Israel Fund, which raised nearly $37 million from private sources, debuted at 354th place. That includes a $20 million grant from the Ford Foundation last fall, the group told JTA. Donations to the federation system's annual campaign — assembled from federations across North America — dipped only slightly in 2003, to $827.5 million from $831.9 million the year before. The annual campaign has hov- ered in the low- to mid-$800 million range since 2000. The UJC raises another $1.2 billion each year through planned giving and endowments. The list comes as federa- tions report an increase in annual cam- paign gifts for 2004. Detroit's Ranking The Detroit federation has run an Israel emergency campaign for three years, but support peaked in the first year, said Mark Davidoff, executive director and chief operating officer. The Jewish Federation of Detroit, which last year raised more than $76 million, ranking third in fund-raising among Jewish fed- erations, slid to seventh place among federations, with $49 million raised. Davidoff said the drop reflected the end of another special campaign — its Millennium Campaign for Detroit's Jewish Future endowment drive — which raised $60 million between 1998 and 2002. Endowments declined in Davidoff 2003, follow- ing the stock market, Davidoff said. Two components mark the change from year to year besides the end of the Millennium Campaign — endowments and the "second line" campaigns, he said. The endowment component is in direct relation to the economy and the stock market, he said. The second-line campaign — the Israel Emergency Campaign that raised $7 million in 2002, and the Grand Challenge Fund, which raised $4.25 million in 2003, also had an effect on the numbers. "In three years, we raised $15 million WHO'S UP on page 36 34T 11/ 5 2004 35