LETTERS We prefer letters that relate to articles in the Jewish News. We reserve the right to edit or reject letters. Brevity is encouraged. Letter writers generally are limited to one letter per 4-6 week period, space permitting. Letters must contain the name, address and tide of the writer, and a daytime telephone number. Original copies must be hand signed. Mail to the Jewish News at 29200 Northwestern Hwy., Suite 110, Southfield, MI 48034; fax to (248) 304-8885; or e-mail to: rsklar@thejewishnews.com We prefer letters to be e-mailed. More original letters are posted at www.detrohjewishnews.com Kerry For President During this political season, I hear with regularity that the Bush adminis- tration is "good for Israel." The unstat- ed follow-up is that John Kerry will not be. Here are some key excerpts from Sen. Kerry's Position Paper on Israel, dated June 21, 2004: • Supports Israel's right to self- defense, including actions against Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terror- ist groups. • Supports the construction of Israel's security fence as an act of self- defense, believing it is not a matter for the International Court of Justice. • Supports planned withdrawal from Gaza. • Palestinians must settle in a future Palestinian state, not in Israel. • Believes Yasser Arafat is a failed leader. • Advocates restricting arms sales to Arab countries. • Demands accountability and action from Arab countries to elimi- nate flow of funds to terrorists. • Always voted to maintain critical aid to Israel, resisting attempts in the Senate to do otherwise. • Anti-Semitism, masked in anti- Israel rhetoric, is a dangerous trend. He will take governments to task for failing to address it. • Would end the "sweetheart rela- tionship" with Arab countries allowing Hamas, Hezballah, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, etc., to function within their borders. • Co-sponsored the Syria Accountability Act, banning exports of military items to Syria. • Understands that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable. • Believes Israel's cause must be America's cause. Those in our community who care about Israel, and are concerned about the resurgence of anti-Semitism world- wide, must not assume that Kerry will not be "good for us." may not be a great orator, he has cer- tainly done much since Sept. 11, 2001. President Bush does not merely talk about fighting terrorism, he has actual- ly taken the fight overseas to the terror- ists. The Taliban, who allowed Osama bin Laden to freely train and plan the 9-11 attacks, have been removed from power. Iraq's Saddam Hussein, a mad- man who every president (even Bill Clinton) and every country believed had weapons of mass destruction and who would certainly have pursued them after sanctions were lifted, was eliminated. Is the job done? Of course not. It took almost six years to defeat the Nazis and Japanese in World War II. Since Shammai says we should look at deeds and not words, the new Iraqi government could be judged on the fact that it does not offer blood money, like Saddam did, to Palestinian terror- ists who kill Jews. And what of Sen. John Kerry? He says he will do better in the war on ter- rorism. While in the Senate, Kerry has voted against every major weapons sys- tem to protect the United States. In 1991, he voted against removing Iraq from Kuwait, even with a "coalition" of 34 countries, which included France, Germany and Russia. What has he now offered besides the promise to enlist the Europeans in the fight? I for one am uncomfortable with the idea of depending on European countries that did nothing but appease Hider and now believe Israel is the greatest threat to world peace. Nor am I desirous of relying on France with a large Muslim minority and which had a government minister label Israel as "a sh**ty little country." Deeds, not fancy words, are impor- tant. Fortunately, President Bush has a long-term global view and has acted for a safer America, a safer Israel and a safer world. President Bush deserves re- election. Donald Scharg West Bloomfield Diane Pomish West Bloomfield In Step With Kerry Bush Has Stood Tall 'TN 9/24 2004 6 The wisdom of Perkei Avot (Ethics of Our Fathers), is timeless and gives insight for the upcoming presidential election. In Chapter 1:15, Shammai says "Say little and do much." With this great teaching, both presidential candidates can be evaluated. While President George W Bush I have heard the argument that George W. Bush is good for Israel and, suppos- edly, Israelis are hoping for a Republican landslide. The mystery is why anyone, American or Israeli, assumes John Kerry would not support Israel. Clearly, it is in the best interests of our country to support the only democracy in the Middle East. Kerry is not about to sell out Israel, tear down the wall or buddy up to a scoundrel like Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. As we celebrate 350 years of Jewish life in America, should we not consid- er America's future? I believe it is in our best interests as American Jews to have an intelligent president who will attempt to repair our shattered relationships with allies, choose Supreme Court justices who will not lead us into theocracy, show outrage against the proliferation of assault weapons, rescue an endangered environment, rein in a runaway deficit and, dare I say, restore the image of America as a country that does not practice unwarranted aggression. America has enabled the Jewish peo- ple to prosper. Better to send money to Israel than support a president who, in the past four years, has failed to practice the morality we espouse as Jews. No candidate for any office satisfies every voter's wish list. But in this year's presidential contest, it would be a grave mistake to vote for. Bush on just the single issue of Israel. The conse- quences are ominous. Bush's support of Israel has not diminished the threat of terrorism. Instead, we find ourselves living in a nation despised by most of the world. A Sept. 10 advertisement (Republican Jewish Coalition, page 7) quotes Bush as saying, "I will continue to call upon our friends in Europe to renounce and fight any sign of anti- Semitism in their midst." Do we still have friends in Europe? Edith Broida Farmington Hills Bush Is Supported I'm voting for President Bush and here's why. We are at war, the most dangerous war we have ever faced. An unrelent- ing war against savages who don't want to enslave us, they want to kill us. Iraq and Afghanistan are just early phases in this war — just like Tarawa, Okinawa, Iwo Jima, Normandy and Sicily were phases in World War II. We have to be on the offensive and I'll take patriots like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condolezza Rice and Colin Powell anytime, rather than Kerry and his friends. Friends who Kerry gave prominent speaking roles to at the Democratic convention, whose anti-Israel and anti-American views and positions are well known, include Jimmy Carter, Al Sharpton (a known bigot who got prime time at the convention!), Dennis Kucinich and Barak Obama. Kerry also warmly welcomed Michael Moore in the presi- dential box. Kerry sent a message loud and clear to the Jewish community about where he stands. Then there's Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Whoopi Goldberg and Jesse Jackson. Anyone who uses people like this and their ilk as their support base does not have the value system I'm interested in. It should be clear by now to anyone that President Bush is pro-Israel and isn't ashamed or embarrassed to say so. It's not only the issues, security and honesty which I trust Bush with, but it's also his integrity. Kerry allied himself with Jane Fonda and became a traitor when he returned from Vietnam. Kerry tailors what he says according to who his audience is. For me, that means his word can't be trusted. My issues and priorities are the secu- rity of the free world, the security of the United States and the security of Israel. I would rather have the Bush team protecting that security. I don't dare trust Kerry with my country's security. Ed Kohl West Bloomfield Kerry Outshines Bush The full-page ad from the Republican Jewish Coalition (Sept. 17, page 9) was deeply misleading in its blanket assertion that Sen. John Kerry has been silent on the subject of Israel. Sen. Kerry's entire life in public service has reflected his strong and steadfast commitment to supporting and caring about the State of Israel. Moreover, to stake its claim on the specific content of Sen. Kerry's accept- ance speech is particularly dishonest because the truth is that President Bush hardly said a word about Israel in his own acceptance speech either. Both candidates have strong, well- known records of support for Israel. In my opinion, however, President Bush's support has been mainly rhetorical, and his pervasive inattention and fail- ure to engage personally in the current mess has been a huge factor in the deterioration of the situation since he took office. Sen. Kerry has had extensive, thoughtful policy statements about Israel and the Middle East on his Web