OTHER VIEWS The Wrong Choice Choosing Choice unday, April 25, 2004, 7 a.m.: I wasn't leaving my house to get bagels or work out. I and six other Bloomfield Township women had accepted Diane Orley's invi- tation to March for Women's Lives in Washington, D.C. In the car on the way to the airport, we got acquainted. On the plane, we bonded. By the end of the day, we were sis- ters. We marched; we made history. We made a difference. The March for Women's Lives was the first large-scale abortion demonstra- LISA tion in 12 years. It was KIRSCH a necessary response to SATAWA President Bush's con- Point tinued anti-women stance and ideological agenda on choice and family planning programs at home and abroad. One in our group, Betsy Appleton, arrived in Washington early 9n April 23. She and her sister had the opportunity to experience the organization of the march, helping NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League) staple signs together for the Michigan delega- tion. "We felt not just supportive, but productive,” Betsy said. Betsy joined her sister in marching because, she explained, "Each person must stand up and be counted against the Bush admin- istration's religious, fundamentalist inter- pretation." Nancy Hodari felt initial anxiety about the march, predicting that she would see "the same faces, only 30 years older," from past marches in which she had participated. "I have never felt such satisfaction from being wrong," Nancy said. "It was energizing to see so many young people and large groups of minorities organized by schools, univer- sities, clubs and other coalitions." We arrived at the mall and joined over a million others who shared our com- mitment to free choice, worldwide access to reproductive health care, worldwide access to birth control and worldwide education about women's health issues. Men and women, young and old, of every race and origin congregated wear- ing shirts festooned with stickers and Lisa Kirsch Satawa is a Bloomfield Township resident. 5/21 2004 74 n buttons and carrying signs. "Question New York City Authority," read the sign of a 5-year-old undreds of thousands of perched on her dad's shoulders. "Post- demonstrators flocked to Menopausal Woman Nostalgic for Washington, D.C., on Choice," read another. April 25 for a rally in sup- We saw groups from Michigan, port of leg-al abortion. Thousands of the including Hadassah and the Reform participants attended as members of an synagogues. There were so many people assortment of Jewish organizations. And with so many ways to tell the world that many of those Jewish participants nur- these issues need attention — we lis- tured a deep conviction that their stance tened to Gloria Steinem, expressed a deeply Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jewish value. They Julianne Moore, Whoopi were wrong. Goldberg, Cybil Shepard To be sure, the and many not-so-famous Taking sides on the view that the secular students and leaders from law of the United right to choose. around the world. States should reflect "I can't even begin to religious attitudes toward abortion is certainly open to reasonable debate. But what ought not be open to debate is Judaism's essentially negative attitude toward the issue. The assertion that maintaining an essentially unfettered right to feticide — the upshot of Roe vs. Wade — is some- how a Jewish imper- Local marchers (front row) Nancy Hodari, Jan Frank, Betsy ative (or, for that Appleton, (back row) Hilary Isakow, Lisa Kirsch Satawa, matter, in any way Diane Orley, Marilyn Madorsky, Debbie Colman. in consonance with Jewish tradition) describe what an unbelievable experience wildly distorts the truth. Because the it was for me," said Debbie Colman. "I abortion issue is not only about rights wanted to show my two daughters the but about right — as in "right and importance of freedom of choice." wrong." And, while Judaism has little to Diane Orley, who originated the idea say about rights — it speaks rather of this group's participation, was similar- about duties and obligations — it has ly motivated. She marched to protect much to say about right. her children's rights. "We must continue Take the procedure whose outlawing to make our voices heard," she urged. was a major stimulus for the recent Hilary Isakow had a different perspec- rally. Despite the intense and concerted tive. She grew up in South Africa under efforts of some to misrepresent the law apartheid. Rights were afforded only to a prohibiting "partial-birth abortion," its small part of the population and opposi- language is stark and clear. It prohibits tion to the government was vigorously any overt act "that the person knows punished. "When I became an will kill" a fetus whose "entire ... head is American citizen," she said, "I under- outside the body of the mother, or, in stood the importance of voting and the the case of breech presentation, any part right to voice opposition without fear. of the fetal trunk past the navel is out- The laws for freedom of reproductive side the body of the mother." choice have slowly been eroded by the There is no possible way to square a current administration, and I felt by "right" to perform such an act — which marching, I did a small part to make my Avi Shafran is director of public voice heard." affairs for Agudath Israel of America. "Ours is the first generation which This article originally appeared in the took choice for granted," said Jan Frank. Forward. His e-mail address is is little if anything short of infanticide — with Jewish law or Jewish tradition's reverence for even a single life. As to the larger issue of abortion as it is more commonly performed, while Talmudic sources are clear that the life of a pregnancy-endangered Jewish mother takes precedence over that of her unborn child, that is so only when there is no way to preserve both lives. Admittedly — although the matter is hardly free of contro- versy — there are respected rabbinic opinions that permit abortion when the pregnancy seriously jeopardizes the mother's RABBI AVI health. But those nar- SHAFRAN row exceptions in no Counterpoint way translate into some unlimited mother's "right" to make whatever "choice" she may see fit about the life of the child she carries. And yet a special "Roe Reaches 30" supplement to Hadassah magazine's summer 2003 issue quotes unnamed "authorities" to maintain that Jewish law "implicitly assumes that a woman has the right to make her own repro- ductive choices." The supplement's "Jewish Law" section goes on to claim that "restricting access to reproductive services ... undermines basic tenets of Judaism." Those assertions in no way reflect accepted — or even seriously enter- tained — rabbinic opinion. If anything undermines basic tenets of Judaism, it is the notion that the Torah allows unfet- tered "access to reproductive services" — i.e. Roe vs. Wade-style abortion-on- demand. It is undeniable: Judaism values life and potential life as well. Nothing could be more profoundly un-Jewish than maintaining that a woman has the "right" to make "personal choices" at the expense of a developing life. The image of Jews en masse embrac- ing social, cultural or political move- ments as "Jewish" is nothing new Fairly recent times saw a considerable number of Jewish men and women proudly bearing the banner of socialism and even communism as the very embodi- ments of the Jewish prophets' words. Others today tout democracy or capi- talism as quintessential expressions of Torah-truth. And many were the "isms" shafran@amechad. corn SHAFRAN on page 75 ' OA SATAWA on page 75