OTHER VIEWS Anti-Semitism Explained Philadelphia yen in a world where anti- Semitism is becoming increasingly accepted, occa- sionally someone can say something that shocks even the French. The speech of Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad at a meeting of a conference of Islamic countries last week contained so much blatant anti-Jewish bigotry that French President Jacques Chirac felt compelled to condemn it. To the applause of his fellow Muslim world leaders, Mahathir informed the world that it was being run "by the Jews." The Malaysian spiced this rather routine litany of anti-Semitic invective by going on to state that the Jews "invented ... human rights and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so that they can enjoy equal rights with others." To his credit, President Bush made a point of personally refuting Mahathir's screed. It would be nice to think that Mahathir's speech was just the ravings of a nutty Malaysian. That appeared to be the spin the administration wanted to put on the affair. Even as she condemned Mahathir's words, National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice tempered that by saying, "I don't think they are emblematic of the Muslim world." What Moderates' Think Perhaps Rice missed the fact that Ahmed Maher, foreign minister of Egypt, supposedly a U.S. ally, praised Mahathir's speech as "a very, very wise assessment." And Hamid Karzai, recently installed by the United States as the leader of Afghanistan, called it "very correct." And those were just the comments from the "moderates." Far from being unusual, this type of Jew- hatred has become typical in an Arab and Muslim world that has become the global producer of anti- Semitism. Jews and Americans have become the bogeymen of the Muslim imagination, filling heads with ready-made excuses for the failure of Muslim civilization to keep up with the West. This drivel has been hammered into the minds of young Muslims around the world in schools paid for by America's Saudi "allies." But, predictably, for some Americans the answer lies not in confronting the dementia that passes for wisdom in the Muslim world, but for America to change its poli- cies. It didn't take long for such a suggestion to appear on the Op-Ed page of the New York Times. The author was Times columnist Paul Krugman, the Princeton economist who usually confines himself to rab- Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of idly partisan attacks on Bush's the Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia. domestic policies. His e-mail address is But on Oct. 21, Krugman told his jtobin@jewishexponent.com Israel academics — came readers that the Malaysian back to tell us that America's leader isn't really such a bad bad image in the Muslim guy. In a piece titled world was largely our own "Listening to Mahathir," fault. They think that we Krugman said that the bulk should increase our efforts to of the speech was an accurate make nice with Arabs and depiction of Muslim prob- lems. If he indulged in Jew- Muslims, and even rethink baiting, we should, Krugman JONATHAN our foreign policy. S. TOBIN said, understand he was just And that always comes Special throwing his constituents back to the same canard Commentary floated by Krugman — that "rhetorical red meat" as part support for Israel is at the of a "delicate balancing act aimed at domestic politics." heart of hostility to the West, and that if only Washington would cut In other words, Mahathir was no the Israelis loose, then Muslims different from, say, a politician in the American South in the 1950s wouldn't hate us or crash hijacked airliners into skyscrapers to get our who had "progressive" views, but who ranted about the threat to white attention. America from blacks in order to stay This sort of nonsense has been in office. Except, of course, that resisted by sensible elements of the Bush administration, which has Krugman and the rest of 2003 America no longer believe that such focused on fighting terror, not balancing acts are either justified or rationalizing it. But that has also been accompanied by a willful blind- defensible. ness to the miasma of hate that per- vades the Muslim world. Most state- Blame It On Us And Israel ments coming out of Washington on this issue, like Rice's, are something According to Krugman, it really isn't Mahathir's fault that he has to say between a prayer and a hope that if such nasty things. "The rising tide of we ignore the problem, maybe it will anti-Americanism and anti- just go away. Semitism" is, according to this sage Instead, maybe we should be telling Muslims that, contrary to of Princeton, due to Bush's war in Iraq and "unconditional support for Mahathir, they aren't being "humili- ated" and "oppressed" by Israel. They Ariel Sharon." Krugman's view is in line with the are being humiliated and oppressed by their own leaders, and a culture views of a State Department panel that recently toured the world trying that is hostile to those concepts of "human rights" that they claim the to find out why Muslims don't like Jews invented to swindle them. ❑ us. That panel — packed with anti- Loving And Loathing Israel They love us; they love us not; they love us; they love us not ... Jerusalem T he contrast couldn't be more extreme. Earlier this month, during a week in which Israel was bashed, maligned, ostracized, vilified, shunned, slammed, berated and raked over the coals by much of the interna- tional community for its building of a security fence in the West Bank and Robert Sarner is a senior reporter-editor on Israel's only English-language daily TV news show. Before moving to Israel in 1990, he was a writer and magazine editor in Paris and Toronto. His e-mail address is rsarner@netvision.net.il 10/24 2003 34 its air strike on a terrorist camp in Syria, 3,000 Christians from around the world paraded through downtown Jerusalem in support of Israel. They marched in delegations repre- senting the 80 countries from which they came. Dressed in their national costumes, the visitors waved banners and sang songs in solidarity with Israel. Their unfettered love for our besieged little nation was heart-warm- ing for most Israelis, if not a bit bewildering. These days, Israelis are much more accustomed to ill wind from abroad than warmth from strangers. We're far more used to being persona non grata on the world stage. Many people despise our government and every- thing it stands for. They blame us for many of the troubles in the world. They denounce us as an Unrelenting Hate American beachhead in the Today, Israel seems to have Middle East. They resent us reached a worrying new low being tough, assertive and flex- in international opinion, even ing our muscles in self-defense. worse than during the Do I exaggerate? If so, not by Lebanon War in 1982. much. Hostility to Israel (sometimes To be an Israeli today is to masking a not-so-latent anti- be hated by much of the Semitism) is growing. It takes ROBERT world. We know it and feel it. many forms, often going way SARNER We've almost come to expect beyond condemning specific Special it, not out of Jewish paranoia Commentary actions to even question the but from mounting evidence. very legitimacy of Israel as a We're almost resigned to such state. antipathy. As part of a sinister effort to turn it It's nothing personal of course, not into a pariah state, our adversaries aimed at me or my family or friends demonize Israel, portraying it as a and neighbors, just our country. It's rogue entity and the main cause of just a visceral contempt for Israel. Not world terror. new, but more aggressive and more Few countries, if any, have been the widespread than in the past. object of such loathing and hypocrisy