inion Editorials are posted and archived on JN Online: www.detroitjewishnevvs.com The Neighborly Way Dry Bones t was intended to be a temporary lender for home buyers and renovators in older Jewish neighborhoods of south Oakland County, but it kept busy for 17 years. There's still a demand for the interest-free incentive loans, but to lesser degrees in recent years as the neighborhoods stabilized. Still, we wonder if younger Jewish families, with newer home choices to the north and west, will continue to embrace Oak Park and Southfield, two long-settled Jewish areas, now that Neighborhood Project, the lending agency, is no more. The Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit started the Neighborhood Project in 1986 to allay fears that Jews would leave the two historically and religiously significant Jewish cities. The hope was to entice Jews of every age bracket — especially growing families — to live there. Over its impressive 17-year run, the Neighborhood Project closed 1,202 loans for houses and 153 loans for renovations — an average of 80 a year. The loans totaled $7.5 mil- lion; only 2 percent are delinquent. By any standard, the Neighborhood Project did what it set out to do: stabilize north Oak Park and east Southfield as vibrant Jewish areas with rising property values. At least a third of the home buyers were Orthodox, but Jews of all back- I grounds live in the area harmoniously. Loans were its reason for being, but the Neighborhood Project also sponsored events to reinforce the notion that Jews of diverse back- grounds coming together make a neighborhood vital, not just a cluster of buildings. - Synagogues representing all the major streams of Judaism join day schools and the Jewish Community Center as area anchors. Other places to learn join Jewish stores, services and restaurants as important signposts. The Neighborhood Project was funded by Federation's financial arm, the United Jewish Foundation, and managed by the Hebrew Free Loan Association. HFLA will manage $1.2 million in outstanding Project- awarded loans. Without fuss; the Neighborhood Project cast an inviting glow over its target areas. Only 30 new loans were expected this year, though. With success chasing the original need, the question now becomes how to natu- rally sustain the stability. By stepping back, Federation hopes to find the answer. We applaud Federation's confidence that north Oak Park and east Southfield will thrive as Jewish enclaves. Still, Federation bears the burden of reviving loan incentives and expand- ing the Hebrew Free Loan cash pool should the fragile stability that resonates in those areas today start to erode in the future. 7 rAND -71-1112 07 RECEIVING IS 801 . 1-I THEIR THE "1-6 N 14ARv6ST COM MAND 141 ► 1/431- S HOU DAL-( 2 AT MOUNT .4 SINA ■ 1-101,\DA`f HOLIDAYS N ONE? EDITO !UAL • r36FoRe 146• Sommel2 DOLDRUMS t T "114 CO NtrIUNNIV ❑ Ruling The Palestinians n the haste to do something, almost any- thing, that looks like progress toward stabi- lizing the Middle East, the Western powers and the United Nations are pushing to get Israel to agree to a Palestinian state with some ill- defined borders and almost all the other major bones of contention left unresolved. But the worst failure of this road map is that it pays virtually no attention to the question of how this Palestine-to-be might be governed. The road map Quartet — the U.S., Russia, the European Union and the U.N. — talk about the emergence of a representative democracy in this imagined Palestine, a government of civil law and transparent processes that will be somehow a reflection of the Israeli system. But they neglect to spell out any credible process by which this system is supposed to emerge. Granted, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat will eventually be sidelined, either by increasing infir- mity or the external pressures for apparent progress. He will go off to Paris to live on the bil- lion or so he has looted over the last two decades. Who will succeed him? Surely not Mahmoud Abbas, the prime minister forced into place by the West without a shred of political backing. Abbas may be doing all the right things according to his Quartet supporters, who have joined Israeli leaders in seemingly overlook- ing his history of Holocaust denial as possibly some impediment to his getting along famously with the Jewish state. But he has yet to demonstrate any ability to operate independently of Arafat on the most crucial issue of reining in the terrorists. As America is finding to its dismay in Iraq, it is much easier to talk about democracy emerging than to actually have it happen. A post-Arafat Palestine — particularly one that is worth fighting over because it will be the recipient of substantial and lootable foreign aid — is most likely to see years of struggle between the factions that Arafat has for so long played off against each other. And none of them will rise triumphant because they embrace a meaningful democracy. It is important to remember who the bulk of the West Bank and Gaza Palestinians are. Their par- ents, who left Israel in 1948, were not the well- educated, affluent leaders; those families went off EDIT ORIAL to Lebanon and Syria and Jordan where they could continue to live decently. Instead, most of the Palestinians are the sons and daughters of peasants with little sophistication about the world or political process. They are most easily led by the locals they know best, like their mosque's imam, or by the rabble-rousers of Hamas and Islamic Jihad and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades who tell them that their woes are all the fault of Israel. The next leader of this Palestine will be the strongest of the strong-arm men, a figure who could easily and distressingly resemble a Saddam Hussein. He will certainly control his own well- armed militia; the only thing that will curb him will be the state's lack of readily exploitable resources, like oil, that could be sold for more arms. Prime Minister. Ariel Sharon is correct in saying that it is not in Israel's long-term interest to rule over 3.5 million Palestinians. But somebody is going to do the job and we should not be sur- prised if it turns out that the "new" government of the "new" state proves as shortsighted and corrupt as the present one. H et 6/ 6 2003 29