■ Editorials are posted and archived on JN Online: www.detroitjewishnews.com A Better Educational Blueprint n an unprecedented move holding great prom- ise, the central agency for Detroit's organized Jewish community is about to become the main conduit for local planning and programs related to Jewish education. On Jan. 23, the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit's Board of Governors unanimously voted to support, in principle, merging the independent Agency for Jewish Education and Federation's Alliance for Jewish Education. Early signs indicate the blending of Detroit Jewry's provider of educational services into the community's planner of such services is a logical, positive move and a natural progression of the ever-changing state of Jewish education here. This new, one-stop shop for learning Jewishly has vast potential to create a stronger, more united voice. Over the past 10 years, our community has been inconsistent in trying collectively to elevate both the status and quality of Jewish education. AJE, a Federation constituent agency, was formed in 1992 as a modern outgrowth of the United Hebrew Schools. The AJE under Rabbi Judah Isaacs has become even more adept in serving educators. The Alliance came about in 1998 after Federation determined that the community lacked a central think-tank for Jewish education at all age levels. Since then, all three Federation presidents have made Jewish education a high priority as well as a powerful anti- dote to the lures Of assimilation, intermarriage and apathy. Campaign allocations and endowed funds more than ever are ticketed for education line items. It was beshert that the Agency and the Alliance would come together. As separate entities, it wasn't clear to them precisely how their roles blended. That led to an awkward, inefficient system to put new edu- cational ideas into motion. The community has sorely lacked efficiencies in try- ing to serve a diverse range of students, abilities and interests, even within families. A comprehensive pool- ing of thinking, resources and funding is more likely to happen through a department of Federation than an outside agency. In this scenario, we should see a quicker, more inclusive response to the needs that arise. Another benefit to the merger is the abili- ty to tap into the leadership and expertise of two proven entities, bringing together the best of both and producing better decisions. This will be crucial in building a blueprint for inspired learning that res- onates for all. Many of the ideas pitched by the Alliance could only be delivered via an organized sup- port team like the Agency staff Federation doesn't control any of our day, after- noon or supplemental schools. But all look to it for guidance and support. The dramatic shift in ultimate responsibility to Federation instantly makes Detroit a cru- cible for shaping a Jewish educa- tion model that excels in the planning and the delivery of all services. No proven model already exists. Challenges aplenty lie ahead as a transition team creates the road map for integrating the AJE into the Alliance and deliv- ering relevant, interactive edu- cation tools that stir even mar- ginal learners. Unclear are whom the lay leaders will be, if all current staff will be absorbed, how the $2 million in annual combined operating budgets will be reallocated, what new grants or endowments now may be within reach, and what's in store for the delicate balance between formal and informal learning opportunities. The Alliance has spurred strong relationships with our afternoon schools. In the future, it must help those schools maximize use of the computer labs it has put in each of them. It also vows to better serve day schools, especially through educator training. In the end, the community must hold the realigned Alliance,. and Federation, accountable in these and all of their educational pursuits. Merging the AJE and the Alliance may set a stan- dard on paper that we can be proud of, but to really be the best that it can be, the new Alliance must think and act outside the box in ways that give Jews, Torah observant or not, a reason to want to delve deeper into their history and heritage as part of a people. ❑ that alternative. The voters were unequivocal in reject- ing the plan of Labor leader Amram Mitzna to enter into talks with the Palestinians without preconditions; they quite rightly insisted that the Palestinians first make a good faith and effective effort to -quell terror- ism before substantive talks can take place. Labor would serve both the national interest and its own future by choosing a replaceffient for Mitzna as soon as possible and joining a national unity government with Likud and the other major electoral victor, the Shinui (Change) Party of Tommy Lapid. Likud's 38 seats, coupled with 19 from Labor and 15 from Shinui, would provide a comfortable margin for a Sharon government:that,whUld not haye to rely on staying in good graces with a handful of splinter parties, many from a religious rift that h a . s -been far too insistent on enforcing its :Apt-int : on national policies. SharOn does norhave to deine'an the substantial _ contribution of the ultra-Orthodox to protecting Jewish tradition, but he can work for a government that guarantees more equal treatment of all citizens, observant or not, as Shinui has sought. And he can certainly be comfortable with stopping the rapid and needless expansion of West Bank settle- mentsoas Labor wants. It would be better to use the settlement subsidies for repair work within Israel proper, a policy that may, in any event, be forced on Israel as a condition for new financial aid from the U.S. In the coming months, Israel is likely to face new Middle East instability and terrorist threats because of Arab anger over America's now almost inevitable war with Iraq. The best way to deal with that fact is to present a national government that speaks with one voice and one mind on the core issues. That is what the electorate has said it wants. That is what it deserves. ❑ EDITO RIAL Related story: page 20 Greenber s View And Now To Lead riel Sharon deserves congratulations for his convincing win in the Israeli Knesset elec- tions. Despite an Israeli press preoccupation with the "scandals" of alleged campaign pay- offs within Likud, the prime minister has obviously - persuaded Israel that he and his platform represent the best current choices for defending the country's security and rebuilding its economy. Still, he must assemble a strong working majority within the 120-seat parliament to provide consistency and stability in the rebuilding process. Israel has exter- nal troubles enough. It doesn't need to present a frac- tious face to the Arabs or to the rest of the world — and that means having a powerful, centrist unity gov- ernment. As much as we would like to see a strong voice for achieving peace through negotiations rather than con- tinued occupation, Labor cannot effectively provide A EDITORIAL 2/ 7 2003 35