Tug Of War UJC names team to investigate population study amid debate over decision to pull survey. JOE BERKOFSKY Jewish Telegraphic Agency New York City he head of the United Jewish Communities appointed a committee this week to investigate what went wrong with the National Jewish Population Survey (NJPS). The appointments came as Stephen Hoffman, president and CEO of the UJC, which funded the $6 million study, traded barbs with top advisers to the much-heralded survey over his decision to delay making key parts of the study public. Members of the National Technical Advisory Committee are criticizing Hoffman for pulling its release from the organization's General Assembly in Philadelphia this week. Hoffman is standing by the decision he made after learning last week that the out- side research firm conducting the 2000-01 study lost some data. Hoffman said he had lost faith in the committee's top two advisers and that the study was too important to risk going forward at this.time. He said the lost data raised concerns that could damage the credibility of what was being billed as the most extensive portrait of American Jewry to date. "The issue is not that there's something cat- astrophic — there's no smoking gun here," Hoffman said. "The issue is an accumulation of questions concerning NJPS." Hoffman's decision to delay the NJPS came on the eve of the General Assembly, where many in the organized Jewish community were expecting to learn the latest data from the sur- vey about Jewish identity issues such as affilia- tion and intermarriage. "The integrity of the National Jewish Population Study is of the utmost importance," Hoffman said Monday as he appointed a task force to investigate the matter. Hoffman named McGill University's principal and vice chancellor, Bernard Shapiro, to head the UJC task force. Hoffman also appointed Howard Rieger, president of the United Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh, and Mandell Berman of Detroit and Edward Kaplan, co-chairs of the NJPS trustees, to the investigative body. The news that the study was not being released stunned the organized Jewish world. Some advisers to the study criticized the delay for generating con- troversy and overshadowing what was essentially an accurate survey. "We think it was a mistake not to release the data," said Frank Mott, co-chair of the advisory committee and professor at Ohio State University. "A molehill T 11/22 2002 16 has been turned into a mountain." Mott, along with co-chair Vivian Klaff, a professor at the University of Delaware, unsuccessfully lobbied Hoffman to go for- ward with the study last week. Despite the fact that "we have a very good data set," Mott said, "to some extent it's now being trashed. Mr. Hoffman reacted very hastily. He is, I think, misinformed." But Hoffman was critical of the leading advisers on the study, saying last week's revelations were only the latest in a series of problems. He said he was con- cerned that the revelations of missing data only reached him last week despite the fact that at least one NJPS researcher knew of the glitch for some time. "I have lost total confidence in the leadership of NTAC," Hoffman said, referring to the advisory panel. The missing data was the "straw that broke my camel's back" regarding the advisory panel leadership, he said. For some time, Hoffman said, he had built an "accumulation of doubt" about the panel's leader- ship, though he declined to say why. Still, Hoffman said he had no plans to dismiss any members of the volunteer advisory panel, and none of the critics on the panel had plans to step down. Awaiting Data Anticipation of the new data on intermarriage and affiliation has built since the last study in 1990 pro- duced the controversial finding that 52 percent of Jews married non-Jews in the previous five years. That finding largely split the community into those who urged outreach to marginal Jews and those who advocated strengthening Jewish identity among those already affiliated. This time around, the NJPS team set out a timetable to release the survey results. UJC released initial population figures last month. According to the latest study, the U.S. Jewish population has fall- en to 5.2 million, down 300,000 from 1990, as the median age climbed and women waited longer to have fewer children. Hoffman last week said that, had he known of the missing data before releasing the initial population information in October, "we would not have released it." But several members of the advisory panel said the missing data was relatively minor. It concerned codes that telephone callers from the firm Roper Audits & Surveys Worldwide were supposed to keep when screening households for Jews, advisory com- mittee members said. The callers failed to keep, or later lost, codes for two-thirds of the first 14 sets of 22 surveys the overall study was based upon, com- mittee members said. David Marker, a member of the adviso- ry committee and senior statistician at the firm Westat, said at worst the glitch caused the study to underestimate the population by 1 percent — well within a typical margin of error for such a large survey sample of 4,500. The missing information could also have resulted in a 5 percent over- estimate of some 40,000 people "loosely associated" with Jews, Marker added, while the number of non-Jews living with Jews may have been overestimated by 1 per- cent. "On a statistical basis, it's not enough" to withhold the survey, Marker said. Klaff said that most of her committee col- leagues were "very disappointed" in the deci- sion to delay the study. Ira Sheskin, an advisory committee member and director of the Jewish Demography Project at the University of Miami's Miller Center for Contemporary Jewish Studies, is among the minority of advisers who supported Hoffman's decision to delay the study until "we're 100 percent certain it's OK." Still, Sheskin said the missing data was not a big problem and he was not aware of any other major problems with the NJPS. "As far as I know, there are not skeletons in the closet," he said. But Hoffman dismissed the argument. Klaff and Mott. "have had an excuse that says, 'it's not signifi- cant' on a number of occasions," Hoffman said, and they "keep explaining away things." "One percent here, 1 percent there — pretty soon it's significant," he said. Still, Hoffman expressed con- fidence in the ultimate outcome of the study. "I have fundamental confidence in the core data," he said. Shapiro, who is heading the investigation, said the task force will convene "in the coming weeks" and "examine the full range of issues concerning NJPS." One path the task force will follow will be uncover- ing who knew of the missing information and at what point. ❑