Editorials are posted and archived on JN Online: www.d.etroitjewishnews.corn The Triumph Of Hate aired — specifically, hatred of Jews — carried the day at the United Nations Conference on Racism in Durban, South Africa, last week. Arab and African nations, many of them bla- tant abusers of human rights at home, chose to make a virulent attack on Israel even if it cost, as it did, any chance that the conference might say something important about the noxious stain of racism that afflicts too much of the world. While the United States and Israel correctly walked out of what had become a travesty, many other westernized nations — to their eternal shame — stayed on, saying they were fighting behind the scenes for language changes that would soft- en the assault on Israel. What a farce! Where were they when the Muslim nations seized the agenda and focused it on the Mideast — a political problem — rather than on the global concern? Why were they afraid to speak out honestly against the ridiculous charge that Israel practices "a new kind of apartheid?" Israel may indeed have condoned discrimina- tion against some of its Arab citizens, as the hearings on the police actions that led to the deaths of 13 Arab Israelis a year ago are detail- ing. And it has, at times, been heavy-handed in its efforts to prevent violence in areas of the West Bank and Gaza. But 98 percent of the Palestinians in those areas live on land gov- erned by the Palestinian Authority, not by Israel. If they are being denied their rights, that is by the actions of a corrupt government headed by a terrorist, Yasser Arafat. Israel, by contrast, protects its citizens, no matter their skin color. As Michael Lerner noted in a New York Times commentary: "Unlike South Africa under apartheid, which targeted anyone born of a certain race, regard- less of religion, Israel has given its largest minority, the Israeli Arabs, the vote and the right to representation in the Knesset. Israeli Arabs have an easier time having their votes counted than blacks in some parts of Florida do." Racism exists, most notably in the countries that led the assault on Israel. But nowhere at the conference did speak- ers single out Sudan or Mauritius, where slavery and tribal warfare rage. Nowhere was the Serbian assault on Macedonian Muslims mentioned. No one addressed India's treatment of its "untouch- ables" or China's brutalizing of Tibetans. Who cheered more loudly than the Zimbabweans, who are currently pursuing a program aimed entirely at seizing any farms owned by whites? Hatred cannot prevail unless we shrug it off in silence. That is why American Jews must seek new ways to explain to other Americans why the resolution is so wrong, as well as why Israel needs to stand up to Palestinian vio- lence. As Arab speakers in Durban made plain, the ultimate goal is not a peaceful Palestinian state neighboring Israel, but a con- quest of all of Israel and the expulsion of all Jews from the Promised Land — another Holocaust. Dry Bones EDITO RUM Related coverage: page 18 Related commentary: page 31 BUT RATNER ON THE DESIRE OF THE AUDIENCE ❑ Mixed Blessings merican Jews often have a bit of a balance problem: Are we Jews first or Americans first? And we often solve the problem by saying that we don't really have to choose one identity over the other because they are not in conflict in this part of the Diaspora. But the potential for division often slides along, just under the surface. It certainly has in the last couple of weeks as we have tried to sort out some of our feelings about the leadership of President George W. Bush. On the one hand, he has twice recently taken good, strong stands in defense of Israel. He correct- ly and vigorously put the responsibility on Palestinian Authority leader Yasser Arafat for his failure to curb the intifada (uprising) violence against Israeli citizens. And he ordered the U.S. delegation to walk out from a United Nations con- ference that was determined to revive the vicious "Zionism is racism" canard. For both those actions, Jews in America and in the rest of the world should be grateful. They were principled stands, particularly the refusal to be browbeaten by the Arab apologists who say the United States cannot be an effective peace broker in the Mideast unless it blames Israel for the vio- lence of the Palestinian terrorists. Bush under- stands that the Mideast doesn't need a peace broker until and unless the Palestinians decide in their hearts that they can accept Israel's right to exist. But while we are, as Jews, grateful for the stands the president has taken internationally, we continue, as Americans, to worry about Bush's domestic priorities. The insistence on pursuing school vouchers, and on trying to funnel money to proselytizing faith-based organizations to supply social services, cannot but weaken this country's strong record of keeping church and state separate. His needless limitation on medical research using stem cells EDITORIA L 9/7 2001 30 from embryos hampers the attack on genetic dis- eases, including some that particularly affect Jews, hardly the desired result if you are truly pro life." And the continuing Bush administration attack on sensible environmental rules and laws arises in a one-sided and misguided belief that the Earth's natural resources exist solely to be used up as rap- idly as possible under the guise of "economic development." Jewish belief in repairing the world, tikkun olam, demands that we improve the human condition, but that we do so in a way that does not sacrifice the environment. Government decision-making requires reaching out beyond the narrow goals of oil company executives. So while we applaud Bush's willingness to stand up for the state of Israel, we American Jews should not let our enthusiasm for that be woven into a broader blanket of approval for policies that we believe aren't in America's best interests, or ours. ❑ C C