Editorials and Letters to the Editor are posted and archived on JN Online: wvvw.detroitjewishnews.com New Year's Predictions IVIV atching on television last Sunday as the crowds celebrated the new year in New York City's Times Square, we got to thinking about how we as Jews fit into this exuberant society and particularly how we coped with the year 2000. Yes, we know, Dec. 31 does not mark the end of the Jewish year — we already had that moment for taking personal stock. But we don't feel threatened by noting that the rest of the world in which we live is taking a moment to mark the passage of time. Looking back to a year ago, to the midst of the millennial hype with all its fears and possibilities, we realized how far off the mark we would have been had we ventured any predictions about the 12 months then ahead of us. It would have been a given, for example, that neither major party would nominate a Jewish candidate for national office. It was equally obvious that the progress toward a Mideast peace was unstoppable. How could we have dreamt that George W. Bush would become presi- dent in part because hundreds of Jews in West Palm Beach accidentally voted for Pat Buchanan instead of Al Gore? It is enough to make us journalists pretty suspi- cious of the conventional wisdom that we pass along to you so insistently. And it certainly should dis- courage us from venturing any predictions about 2001. • But it doesn't, so here are a few: The crisis in the Mideast, far from alienating American Jews, will, in fact, intensify our sense of community and solidarity with Israel, both in the Zionist dream and as the spiritual center of our identity. The conventional wisdom is that Jewish Americans will be so frustrated by lack of progress toward a lasting peace that all but the most dedicated will wash their hands of involve- ment. Our prediction is that, as the issues become more sharply defined — sovereignty in the old city of Jerusalem, the "right of return" for Palestinians who would happily destroy the state of Israel — Jews on this side of the Atlantic will feel more deeply engaged with the nation of Israel. That, in turn, will build more involve- ment with the religious roots of our identity. • Israel will begin to pay more attention to the interests of the Jews of the Diaspora, partic- ularly to those in the West who have often felt alienated by the rigidities of the rabbis who con- trol so much of Israeli life. It is just a hunch, but we think that the evident need for Western sup- port may encourage Israel to try to resolve some of the vexing tensions between secular and reli- gious life in ways that will seem very appropriate to American Jews. • The economic slowdown that seems to be coming our way will not, in the end, diminish the community's humanitarian commitment as reflected both in its political process and its phil- anthropic activities. We think that you will respond to growing needs with growing support because you recognize how remarkable the Jew- ish experience has been in this country and you understand the need to stand fast with the beliefs and actions that have served us so well in the past. Dry Bones at.) A r RESIGNED ISRAELI PRIME NANISTER w6ReTALKIo6 It may not be our new year, but with a lot of effort and a little luck, it could be a very fine one for all of us. El LETTERS Consider Halachah With Transplants Yasher Koach and thank you for your exceptional articles on organ trans- plants ("Lifesaving Legacies," Dec. 29, page 10). The writers — David Sachs and Shelli Liebman Dorfman — vividly portrayed how modern medicine has created miraculous new opportunities for achieving the greatest mitzvah of all, pikuach nefesh, the saving of a life. I found the touching stories about Dr. Jeff Devries, Steven Traison and all of the organ donors to be inspiring. The heroic, life-sustaining gifts that they [literally] gave of themselves is the ultimate expression of our Jewish value of gemilut chasidim, the perfor- mance of acts of lovingkindness. However, your readers, and espe- cially those that choose to follow Halachah, must be cautiously advised. Deciding which transplants and organ donations are halachically sanctioned is a very nuanced, complex and case- specific endeavor. Just as the organ transplant process itself uses a very discriminating and selective medical standard for deciding eligibility for donor recipients and actual matches, so, too, the Halachic process is equally complex. Issues such as risk to the life of donors, risk-reward ratios, the likeli- hood of harvested/banked organs actually being used to save lives, the appropriateness of using organ dona- tions for medical research and experi- mentation, brain death vs. heart/breathing cessation as a determi- nant of death, etc., and myriad other technical issues render the halachic decision-making process highly sophisticated and difficult. Your articles shed much light on the subject and helped inform us of the rudimentary facts of organ transplanta- tion. However, I would caution and advise any layperson considering this option, and seriously wishing to engage the timeless wisdom and values of our Torah and tradition, to seek out a rabbi/Halachist to advise them regarding their own personal circumstances. Just as in the medical arena, we do not hesitate or spare any efforts to seek out the highest level of expertise and competence when faced with a life and death situation, so, too, when an individual faces the moral and ethi- cal decisions of organ transplant and wishes to do so in the context of Jew- ish law, a rabbi schooled in the intrica- cies of this sub-specialty of the Halachah should be consulted. Rabbi E.B. (Bunny) Freedman director, Jewish Hospice and Chaplaincy Network Southfield Organ Donors Offer Life After reading your uplifting articles on organ transplants ("Lifesaving Lega- cies," Dec. 29, page 10), I wanted to share my own experience. Last February, I was diagnosed with leukemia. After weeks of hospitaliza- tion and chemotherapy, I was told that my best chance for a cure would be a bone marrow (stem cell) trans- plant. My incredible brother Mark was a perfect match. He didn't hesitate to do what was necessary to prolong my life, even though he was dealing with his own health problems. The endless support of family and friends along with a somewhat morbid sense of humor helped contribute to my continued recovery. I must also commend an amazing staff of doctors, LETTERS on page 29 1/5 2001 27