HELPING JEWISH FAMILIES GROW' B Rabbi Michael Gold Special to The AppleTree e fruitful and multiply" is the first command- ment in Judaism; children are at the center of the Jewish vision of family life. Today, more and more Jews are choosing to fulfill that mitzvah through adoption. Adoption is a wonder- ful way to build Jewish families. It provides homes for children whose birth parents cannot raise them and children for parents unable to achieve pregnancy. At the same time, it raises numerous halachic, as well as practical, ques- tions for Jews. There is a certain irony in the Jewish view of adoption. Jew- ish sources teach two contradictory messages. On one hand, the Torah and Tal- mud are filled with wonderful exam- ples of adoption and beautiful aggadic sayings about people who raise children born to others. On the other hand, because of the strong emphasis in Judaism on bloodlines and lineage, adoption as a formal legal procedure is totally unknown. In the Torah, Abraham adopts his servant Eliez- er, and Mordecai raises his orphaned cousin Esther. The Talmudic sage Abaye often quotes wise sayings in the name of his foster mother. Perhaps the most beauti- ful statement about adoption concerns Michal, the wife of King David. According to the Torah, Michal never // • //"SAp' esLa had children (II Samuel 6:23); yet it also mentions her five sons (II Samuel 21 :8). Noticing this discrepancy, rabbis in the Talmud remark, "Her sister Merab gave birth to them and she raised them; therefore, they are called by her name. This teaches that whoever brings up an orphan in his home is regarded, according to Scripture, as though the child had been born to him." (Sanhedrin 19b) A similar passage occurs in the midrash, where the question arises as to what Hebrew name to use for a woman raised by a foster father. The decision is to use the foster father's name, because "he who brings up a child is to be called its father, not he who gave birth." (Exodus Rabbah 46:5) Adoption as practiced in mod- ern society usually means the removal of all rights and responsi- bilities of the biological parent, and their transfer to another couple or individual. For all intents and pur- poses, the child's biological lineage is broken. This procedure has its roots in ancient Roman law, where the con- cern was finding an heir for a childless couple. In contrast, British common law, com- ing from a society that placed great emphasis on lineage and class, never developed an adoption proce- dure. Imagine that Prince Charles and Princess Diana had adopted a baby boy; he certainly would not be in line for the throne. Jewish law is far closer to British common law than to