I "I can tell you that for sure it's more hanks to the relentless problems than in the years that I had in persistence of his wife, 7– prison," he says. "In prison, you are en- Avital, Natan Sharansky joying not making any compromises. You spent more than a decade say 'no' to the KGB and you fulfill all your atop the conscience of the West, values. [In politics] it's the absolute oppo- despite his languishing in the site. You have to find the border of where notorious Soviet prisons. you can compromise and where you can't." In freedom, the former math- Mr. Sharansky, Israel's minister of in- ematician has continued to fight dustry and trade, was in the United States on behalf of human. rights — re- this month, a guest of the American-Israel cently, and against the wishes Chamber of Commerce. In an interview, of Israel's foreign ministry, in he discussed what happens when a liv- China. Regarding the Pales- ing legend descends into politics. tinians, he said that he favors a "People said that by going into politics, slow, well-defined and method- it will be the end of me as a living symbol," ical peace process. Mr. Sharansky says. "I said, 'I know this, One year ago, 11 years after but what do I need this symbol for?' Do I triumphantly arriving in need it for the wardrobe when everyone Jerusalem after an East-West applauds you or to use this capital to go out to influence what everyone wants?" Such weakening of public adulation may "In prison you are be inevitable when a moral hero steps into 7– the political sphere. Images of Nelson Man- enjoying not making dela, Vaclav Havel and Lech Walesa come to mind. "That's the price that I knew I would any compromises. have to pay and it's not something that concerns me," he says. "The real problem [In politics] it's the is how to know [if] you are right. That's the constant challenge." A `–) absolute opposite." series of scandals — including a breaking one in which his party is — Natan Sharansky accused of taking $100,000 from an alleged Russian mafioso — has sud- denly made Mr. Sharansky, the politician, very human to American Jews, a group that once uniformly adored the 5-foot-4- inch former dissident. The change also is in part because Mr. Sharansky is chairman of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's dommittee on di- aspora relations. As such, he's the gov- ernment's point man in dealing with American Jews on the Knesset's con- tentious conversion bill. The bill would dis- qualify conversions in Israel not performed by Orthodox rabbis and it has much of American Jewish leadership — at least three-quarters of whom are not Orthodox — up in arms. Mr. Sharansky is now defending his government to those who once fought for his freedom. His American opponents claim that he, of all people, should under- stand what they see as a potential blow to religious freedom. As Mr. Sharansky toured the United States, he often used his sharp wit to de- fend his government on the conversion is- sue. One foreign ministry official suggested that Mr. Sharansky was really sent by Mr. Netanyahu to cool the tempers of Ameri- can Jews. That Mr. Sharansky is being heard not only in the United States but back home is evinced by a recent decision by Israel's chief Sephardi rabbi, Eliyahu Bakshi Doron. At Mr. Sharansky's prompting, Rabbi Doron told cemetery directors to allow burial of Jewish and gentile spouses side-by-side. (Until recently, gentiles could not be buried prisoner exchange, Mr. Sharansky's myth- next to Jews in Israel. About one-third of ical-like life took yet another remarkable Russian immigrants are not Jews, accord- turn. ing to Israel's ministry of absorption.) On May 29 1996, his fledgling political party, Yisrael B'aliyah, received seven Neil Rubin is editor of our sister paper, mandates in Israel's 120-seat parliament. The Atlanta Jewish Times. Suddenly, he and six colleagues — who Pressing the cause: Sharansky's freedom was a central tenet in the Soviet Jewry movement. Pictured above, a 1978 rally in New York City. Free man: Sharansky arrives in Israel in January 1986. had spent their adulthood bitterly op- posing Soviet policies — were pivotal coalition partners for Israel's next prime minister. Not one of them had a day of experience in elected office. Recognizing Mr. Sharansky's role as a key coalition partner, new Prime Minister Binyamin. Netanyahu gave him the ministry of industry and trade. At the same time, Yisrael B'aliyah's No. 2 man, Yuli Edelstein, was named minister of absorption and immigration. Things were relatively smooth un- til mid-October. Then the Sephardi religious party, Shas, introduced a bill in the Knesset to invalidate non- Orthodox conversions. Shas said it had to halt the advances of non-Or- thodox movements through decisions by the country's Supreme Court, which actually had deferred the mat- ter to the Knesset. Netanyahu's Likud bloc voted for the conversion bill, which passed the first of three needed readings to be- come law. On the first reading, Mr. Sharansky was non-committal and instructed Yisrael B'aliyah to abstain. Why? David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, crafted what's known as the status quo agreement," Mr. Sharan- sky explains. It said that anyone convert- ed in the diaspora by a rabbi accepted in that community was considered a Jew in Israel. In Israel, however, only the actions of Orthodox rabbis would count. "I felt in Russia, and today, that every- one who feels he is a Jew is a Jew," Mr. Sharansky says. "After thousands of years of pogroms ... if people feel they belong to this people, why not? The notion is that Is- rael belongs not [only to] everyone who lives in Israel, but to all the Jews in the world. But it has serious practical impli- cations. "If you take my formula — everyone who says he's a Jew — you have to grant citi- zenship. We have 100,000 legal and 100,000 illegal Thai and Rumanian work- ers. What about them? It's extreme, but you have to say it. So you have to say, `What is converted? " "The challenge from the beginning for Ben-Gurion was to make one nation that accepts it." Yisrael B'aliyah, he adds, ac- tually blocked attempts by the religious parties to invalidate non-Orthodox con- versions abroad. "Then the ultra-Orthodox parties brought another proposal that had the sta- tus quo, which is bad actually for the ul- tra-Orthodox," he says. "People go to London and get conversions and this is not good. "We said we are for keeping the status quo, but putting it in legislation is bad. Ifs evil. First we have to [make] every attempt to avoid legislation. We insisted that [the