North Carolina Discounts in Michigan Save 30% to 50% Now...buy fine furniture at COST-PLUS PRICES! We display and offer through our catalogs over 409 famous furniture brands Recommended by: Family Circle magazine, The Underground Shopper, The Toll Free Shopping Guide, & "Live" w/Regis & Kathy Lee. Discover why America's smartest shoppers burthe North Carolina way. `N9rth. Calf)Una Futhiture 1 -800-227-6060 FREEE Call today for free brochure • We deliver nationwide Hours Monday through Saturday 9:30-5:30, Sunday 12-5 She Loves Me She Loves Me Not 286 West Maple • Birmingham (810) 540-1977 THE DE TRO Mon.-Sat. 10-5:30 • Thurs. 10-9 118 Next time you feed your face, think about your heart. Go easy on your heart and start cutting back on foods that are high in saturated fat and cholesterol. The change'lf do you good. U American Heart Association WE'RE FIGHTING FOR YOUR LIFE Washington LOSING page 126 church-state debate has shifted to the right, toward terrain occupied by groups such as Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition. Mr. Istook, whose resonant voice hints of his past as a radio reporter, has become the prima- ry standard-bearer for the Chris- tian right agenda in the House. That status is especially curious because Mr. Istook is a Mormon — a group publicly described as a cult by many Evangelical Chris- tians. In a recent interview, Mr. Is- took kept coming back to one pri- mary reason for altering the First Amendment: the people, he said, want it. For decades, he said, the school prayer issue "has commanded 75 percent popular support among the American people. So when people pose the question 'Why now?' my response is, 'Why not sooner?' Any issue that is of im- portance to that number of peo- ple in the country deserves to be brought up:" But polling data shows that while a majority of Americans support the concept of voluntary, student-initiated school prayer, there is far less support for sweep- ing constitutional changes, ac- cording to Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Reli- gious Action Center of Reform Ju- daism and a professor of constitutional law. And tampering with the Con- stitution to suit changing public attitudes defies the intentions of the nation's founders, he said. "Our fundamental liberties are not supposed to. be subject to ma- jority vote." Leaders of religious right groups regularly argue that the amendment is necessary because of pervasive discrimination against Christians in public set- tings. Mr. Istook said that while Christians have been the prima- ry targets of anti-religious pub- lic policy, other groups have suffered as well from "First Amendment provisions being used as a weapon by judges and government bureaucrats against people of faith." He cited the Lee vs. Weisman and Kiryas Joel cases as exam- ples. The first involved a Supreme Court ruling against a public school graduation benediction by a rabbi; the second centered on de- cisions voiding the creation of a public school district specifically to serve the needs of Orthodox Jews. But Christians, he conceded, will be the primary beneficiaries of his amendment and the vari- ant promoted by the GOP lead- ership. "In a country where Christian- ity is the most prominent religion, you would expect to see that from people who target religious ex- pression generally," he said. "You're going to be targeting the most prominent religion more than the others." Mr. Istook said that under the guise of "political correctness," lib- erals have "tried to undercut the right to free speech by creating a new right of freedom from hear- ing something with which you dis- agree. They have singled out religious expression to be lumped with pornography as categories of expression which are so offensive they should be repressed." Ernest !stook: Blunt objectives. What about religious "witness- ing" in schools and the workplace, a primary concern of Jewish lead- ers who worry that even "student- initiated" prayer will result in a subtle coercion against children who choose not to participate? "Proselytization is a major com- mandment within Christianity," Mr. Istook said, offering citations from the Christian Bible to prove his point. "You can proselytize peo- ple to be a Democrat or a Repub- lican; you can proselytize them to be in some environmental effort. All of these are forms of prosely- tization. So why should we seek different treatment for religious proselytization?" But Jewish activists contend that religious speech is treated dif- ferently in the Constitution be- cause of the enormous power of religion, and the potential for re- ligious coercion by the majority. "Our Founding Fathers over- whelmingly understood that reli- gion is different from other kinds, of speech and activity," Rabb' Saperstein said. "Representative (stook wants to undo over two cen- turies of the most extraordinary religious freedom and vitality in history." Some school prayer advocates want non-sectarian prayer, or a moment of silence; Mr. Istook wants students to have the right -\ to vocal, formal prayer that he says inevitably will reflect their sectarian perspectives. "Anyone's prayer reflects their own religious beliefs," he said. "I don't know of any other area where you try to homogenize peo- ple's expression, and force them L to say things in a government-ap- proved way. That's censoring your LOSING page 130