Opinion Community Views Public School Support Keeps Michigan Viable We Still Accept The Myth Of Race T H he warning alarm has sounded, and the Jewish community must wake up and take action. Sweeping changes in Michigan's public schools have been proposed. Some of these changes have al- ready been implemented, and more are in the works. A brief look at the past year and a half, and in particular the past few months, is enough to demon- strate that an orchestrated effort is under way to permanently al- ter the structure of public edu- cation in our state, in a way that poses serious threats to the sep- aration of church and state. Let's review some of the changes that have taken place re- cently. First, far-reaching edu- cational "reforms" were enacted in the closing hours of the leg- islative session in December 1993. More recently, at the end of the last session this past De- cember, legislation was again / hurriedly enacted to circumvent a court decision in which some aspects of "public school acade- mies," also known as charter schools, were found to be uncon- stitutional. We should be concerned about the substance of this legislation, which may open the door to greater support of private edu- cational institutions, including religious ones. We should be equally concerned about the process by which all of this legis- lation came about — late in the session, without adequate op- portunity for debate and with vir- tually no opportunity for public comment. This runaway-train approach to public policy, having already succeeded more than once, has been tried again and will contin- ue to be attempted unless the vot- ers of the state of Michigan make their views known_ ASI, the rint meeting of the new State of Education, a state- ment of "Vision, Philosophy and Mission" was adopted. This piece, which is not only heavily laced with religious references, but seems to downplay the role of public schools in the education of young people, was hastily enacted, with scant de- bate by board members and no op- portunity for public comment, contrary to customary board pro- cedure and the open process ex- pected of all public schools. While on its face this mission statement may appear to be as controversial as apple pie and motherhood, it must be seen as yet another shot across the bow of church-state separation and protection of religious minorities. Further, it is an affront to those who believe in and respect the de- mocratic process. What is our real concern? Do we fear religion so much that we look for "Christian bogeymen" under every bush? The Jewish community in the United States has prospered and thrived as it has in no other country in the his- tory of the Diaspora. A large part of our success has been directly attributable to the strong pro- tection of religious minorities made possible by keeping the state out of the affairs of religious institutions. The freedom which we have found here has en- abled us to build and maintain our community's strength and cohe- siveness. To the ex- tent that this church-state sepa- ration is threat- ened, our security as a religious mi- nority is threat- ened. Let there be no mistake about it: What we have seen recently is only the beginning of a larger agenda by the radical right. Internal memos of TEACH Michigan, the organization whose stated purpose is currently the promotion of charter schools, re- veal a larger purpose and an elab- orate plan to bring about public support for all charter schools, in- cluding religious schools. Legislation has already been introduced at the behest of the governor to repeal the school code, which would further di- minish public oversight of public schools. Amending the state con- stitution to eliminate its prohi- bition of church-state entangle- ment has also been seriously sug- gested, and we should not be overconfident that it will be de- feated. The goal of this orches- trated campaign is clear: implementation of a voucher sys- tem and parochiaid, which would ultimately sound the death knell for public schools in our state. Before you ask, "So what's so bad about that?" — consider the following. Most of us, our parents and our grandparents owe our success in America to a strong and vital public-school system. While it is true that some mem- bers of the Jewish community have decided, for a variety of rea- sons, to send their children to pri- vate schools, we should not abandon our traditional support of the public schools. As was quite correctly pointed out by Phil Jacobs in his editori- al of Feb. 3, the public-school sys- tem has been the cornerstone of what's good about American so- ciety. When public-school systems deteriorate, the private schools do not fill the void. In effect, the public schools will become places of last resort: for the disadvan- taged, for minorities, for those the private schools can and do reject. Our society can only be dimin- ished by this, and we should not fool ourselves into thinking that we will be unaffected by the col- lapse of the public-school system any more than the suburbs should believe they can continue to thrive in the absence of viable core cities. Public schools are im- portant in and of themselves and further are a key to the strength and viability of the neighbor- hoods they serve. All those who have, up to this point, stayed on the sidelines need to get involved and get in- volved now. The campaign to tear down the wall of separation be- tween church and state is already under way, and the Jewish com- munity must actively participate in this vital debate. The American Jewish Com- mittee, American Jewish Con- gress, Anti-Defamation League, Jewish Community Council, Na- tional Council of Jewish Women and Women's American ORT have been meeting from time to time since November 1993, and we are currently reaching out to allies in the general community to build a united front in support of a strong public-school system, one that offers the liberty and se- curity that have been the great- est source of protection for the Jewish community. We invite you to join with us. Robert Brown American Jewish Congress Fran Gross-Linden Anti-Defamation League Judith Rosenberg National Council of Jewish Women Shirlee Katzman Na'amat USA Cynthia Franklin Women's American ORT Brian Kott American Jewish Committee Kathleen Straus Jewish Community Council THE REV. JAMES R. LYONS SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH NEWS I have always been fascinated with myth-mak- ing. For the past several years as I have been teach- ing about the Holocaust, I have written and lec- tured about, the fallacy of "race." The tragedy about the myth of race is that once it was stud- ied scientifically, or, perhaps bet- ter, pseudo-scientifically, it became a fact that has totally impacted on world culture and understanding and is directly connected with the mass mur- der of Jews in Nazi Germany. Let me explain. In the 1850s, Arthur Comte de Gobineau published in French his work titled Essay on anti-Semitism, developed the concept that Jews were a sepa- rate race with racial character- istics based on their race. The fact that Jews may or may not have a religious affiliation was of no interest to Wilhelm Marr, who made it clear that anti- Semitism was not based on re- ligion but on race. While there are other things that may be and could be ex- panded, let's leap to the Third Reich. During the Nazi period, the persecution and destruction of Jews was racially motivated. Like Marr, the Nazis had no concern about whether individ- uals were Jews religiously or not. Indeed, Jews who had con- verted to Christianity or were born of Christian parents, though grandparents may have been Jewish, were classified Inequality of Human Races. racially in various ways as Jews. Building on a number of In her book Women in the Fa- streams of thought, Gobineau's work be- came a torrential flood of falsehoods. For Gobineau, there were three distinct human races which were immutable and which had characteristics not dependent on where they lived or what their religion hap- pened to be. These characteristics sep- arated them not only physically but culturally and intellectually therland, Claudia Koonz draws from each other. a parallel between racism and Naturally, there were various sexism: types within the three races "To a degree unique in West- identified by Gobineau, with the ern history, Nazi doctrine cre- highest of all being the "white" ated a society structured around race, and Aryans being the high- `natural' biological poles. In ad- est, most cultured, most intel- dition to serving specific needs lectual and finest of all. of the state, this radical division Gobineau lives on in our cur- vindicated a more general and rent society where racism con- thoroughgoing biological tinues to plague us and where Weltanschauung based on race pseudo-scientific works like The and sex as the immutable cat- Bell Curve continue to pursue egories of human nature. the idea of separate character- Once you have accepted that istics and liabilities due to race. the differences between people are A number of studies being qualitative rather than descrip- done currently and reported in tive, hierarchial value judgements papers have indicated that the are made which are based on ide- concepts of race are invalid. ology rather than actual fact. There is a recognition that the To place a value judgment on differences within "races" are of- differences based on false con- ten far greater than those be- cepts of race or sex is to contin- tween races, and that race is not ue the myths that have a biological or scientific fact brit destroyed the lives of millions of a social definition. If that's the men, women and children. They case, why do we continue to live continue in the modern world. with the myth and why do news- The time has come to put a papers which continue to report halt to these false concepts. The these stories use race as a social time has come to move away denominator in their articles? from mere toleration, which at Following Gobineau, a failed best is putting up with, to mu- newspaper writer, Wilhelm tual engagement, which high- Marr, who is called the father of lights acceptance and a The Rev. James Lyons is director willingness to be involved with the other. of the Ecumenical Institute. ❑