PO WE OR PO WE Wr DISARM Az, SoMALiS uostim?1 flowstsou PI I ri WV:mai? //iJ PLEASE FLEAsE! THERE /WV BE SamETHING WE CAN AGREE ON... KNOW 111_11'. Israel's Compromise Politics is the art of the possible. That's why Is- rael did the right thing in agreeing to a com- promise proposal designed to defuse the mounting United Nations' pressure over Jerusalem's deportation of 415 Islamic funda- mentalists tied to the terrorist groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. True, U.N. Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was off-base in his condemna- tion of Israel. He made no effort to take into ac- count the terrorist violence that drove the Rabin government to order the expulsions. Also, his equating Israel's non-compliance with a U.N. resolution with the non-compliance exhibited by Iraq and Serbia was morally despicable. Yet, for all its hypocrisy and timidness, the U.N. still matters. That's why President Clin-, ton was not anxious to cast a veto in support of Israel this early in his administration. By agreeing to allow 100 of the remaining 396 Palestinians who were deported to return to Israel (in most cases, this means their going straight to jail), and cutting the length of ex- pulsion to one year for the others, Jerusalem proved that it is flexible, realistic and ready to do what is necessary to advance the Middle East peace process. Fighting terrorism is a politi- cal as well as a military battle. This should sit well with President Clinton, who pro-Israel activists in Washington gave high marks for his administration's handling of this crisis so far. The Palestinians immediately rejected the compromise offer. That's no surprise. They have a sad history of missed opportunities. But if they wish to suffer the political consequences of another misguided action, that's just fine with us. Making peace in the Middle East requires patience. Reasonableness will pay off over the long haul. Besides, the alternative can only lead to prolonging the conflict. Letters Aguda Stance Is Clarified Thanks for Elizabeth Apple- baum's informative article on the abortion issue. One cor- rection on an impression that may have been conveyed re- garding Agudath Israel's stance: We did decry what we called the "hysterical hyper- bole" of other Jewish groups over the Supreme Court's 1989 decision in Webster, which upheld a Missouri law's prohibition against the use of public facilities and public employees to perform abortions and its requirement that at a certain stage of pregnancy, a doctor must per- form cetain tests to determine fetal viability. Wd did ourselves challenge, however, the "finding" of the Missouri law — which the Supreme Court declined to rule on — that said that hu- man life begins at conception. In our brief in the case, we had argued that while the right to an abortion itself can- not be defined as a "funda- mental liberty" — and that thus states may restrict it — the enactment of a "finding" on the beginning of human life advances a particular re- ligious viewpoint and must be rejected as crossing the con- stitutional barrier between church and state. Rabbi Yitzchok Brandriss Letters Fencing Article Was Appreciated On behalf of the Fencing Academy of Michigan, I want to thank The Jewish News for the very nice article published Jan. 15 about our organiza- tion. Steve Stein did a very fair and accurate presenta- tion, and we appreciate the coverage! In fact, the article has al- ready led to a request that we help organize a U.S. fencing contingent to the upcoming Senior Olympics in Israel! Robert E. Tripp President, Fencing Academy of Michigan Abortion Issue And Jewish Law 6 Elizabeth Applebaum's essay "In the Beginning" (Jan. 22) documents the presence of a Jewish fundamentalist move- ment opposing the right of a Jewish woman to dispose of the fruit of her womb. She cites a veritable med- ley of raucous Jewish men — and very few women — who defend the primacy of the fe- tus, regardless of the pain (spiritual, mental and physi- cal) it inflicts upon its bearer. Singling out the New York- based Jewish Anti-Abortion League and its leader, Rabbi Yehuda Levin, similarities to the thinking and tactics of the Right-to-Life movement, re- plete with the symbols and battle-cries of Christian fun- damentalism, abound. The Torah contains only one unambiguous reference to abortion, the accidental, unintentional termination of a pregnancy (Exodus 21, 22). Quoting an obtuse Halachah referring to Genesis (9:6) "Whosoever sheds man's blood within another man, his blood shall be shed; for in the image of God He made man" might suggest to some that abortion of a fetus resembles murder. In general, the rabbis hold that, unless the fetus breathes independently of its mother, it is not yet consid- ered a human being. The life of the mother has precedent over the emergent fetus. Whenever the fetus as- sumes the function of a rodef (a pursuer) that thereby threatens the mother's well- being, it may be, albeit reluc- tantly, terminated. Preg- nancy caused by incest and, as some authorities maintain, rape may also be ended in the early stages. Halachah, Jewish law, was more liberal then and should be now so interpreted 3,200 years after Moses' death. Rabbi Ernst J. Conrad Past Chair, Michigan Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights Torah View Was Expressed Thank you for "In the Begin- ning." I especially appreciat- ed your publicizing the Torah-true viewpoint on this LET'S CoNIZMN iSR4E.L! issue (prohibition of abortion unless the mother's life is threatened) and the empha- sis on the Torah's regard for the sanctity of life. This per- spective also extends to the euthanasia issue, another topic which has, of late, been discussed in your paper. Our people need to be made aware of the absolute stan- dard of right and wrong that is part and parcel of our Jew- ish faith. As Rabbi Yaakov Weinberg recently explained in an excellent lecture on "Medicide," this absolute standard of morality was the revolution the Jews brought to the world with our accep- tance of monotheism. As opposed to the relative ethics of prevailing social whims and "every man doing what is right in his own eyes," thoughtful readers will un- derstand that belief in our God-given set of rules is es- sential for the continuance of a humane and just society. Susan Tawil Oak Park Agudath Israel of America Absolute Standards In any religious contempla- tion the following question comes up: Are there absolute standards to live by? Ortho- Dry Bones 'AFTER TWELVE YeARS1 714€ woRt.t) nwALLy S-14.31)S ISRAEL'S TAKING OUT, IRAQ'S NUCLEAR el-ANST icle 1 Cartoonists & Writers Syndicate AND ONE PAY I-He-a el/ ALSO UNDERSTA THE JUSTICE, OF NANAAS De Po RTA-iforhaS dox Jews .answer yes. In today's climate of toler- -\ ance, it's relatively easy to live as a Jew. But there are H times when we face the test: do we have the courage of our convictions, the strength to follow the premises on which we predicate our lives to their logical conclusions? One such premise in Ju- daism is the sanctity of life. The test, at least a major one, of the decade will be to create an atmosphere within our families and communities in which every person will be se- cure in the value of his life, will not need to worry that he will be a burden to his loved ones but will rather, with every second of life left, affirm the holiness of that life. I hate to bring up the E word, but this will only come - about if we Educate ourselves Jewishly. As a community, as a people, we have our work cut out for us, as was made painfully obvious by two quotes in the January 22 Jewish News. A reader writes ("Law of Torah and Suicide"): "Of course we no longer extract and eye for an eye." We nev- er did!! The classic commen- taries do not take this verse literally but explain it to mandate compensating the victim. This is not latter-day apologia but its true, eternal meaning. Carolyn Borman describes the broad appeal of the Birm- ingham Temple: "Ideologi- we're not saying you have to believe anything." What she is saying is that services at the temple are def- initely humanistic, quite pos- sibly spiritual, but not specifically Jewish in nature. LETTERS page 10