tile soil for its populist, xenophobic ide- ology in the economically depressed states of the East as well, Mr. Gohring said — a problem compounded by the fact that few foreigners lived in that part of the country during the decades of com- munist rule. "If we had elections now, the right- wing parties would get a significant number of votes," he said. "They could win as high as 5 or 6 percent. But they do not represent a danger with respect to German democracy." Other observers are not so sure. Karsten D. Voigt, foreign policy spokesman for the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the moderate opposition, and a member of the Bundestag, (par- liament) predicted that the Republicans could win up to 12 percent of the Ger- man parliament in the next general elec- tion, forcing the Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats into a "grand coalition" in order to govern. Jewish leaders take an even more pes- simistic view. "They do represent a serious threat to German democracy," said Rabbi Stein. "I can see them (the Republicans) get- ting 25 percent of the vote in the next election, thereby blocking effective democracy." Article 16 Most outside observers and many in the German government admit that of- ficials in Bonn have been slow to respond to the spread of violence in the past few months. The anti-foreigner riots in Ro- stock, the former East German ship- building center now ravaged by unemployment, produced only a feeble police response. Even now, months af- ter the initial disturbances, there are widespread complaints that the gov- ernment is more interested in the po- litical implications of the disturbances than in cracking down on the rioters. Instead, the government has focused almost exclusively on efforts to change Article 16 of the German constitution, a provision that has made Germany a haven for asylum seekers from around the world. `They just stood by at the beginning," said Jerzy Kanal, a Holocaust survivor, real estate magnet and the new chair- man of the Jewish community of Berlin. `They condemned (the rioting) — but they blamed it all on Article 16." But Brigette Baumeister, a Bun- destag member and managing director of the CDU parliamentary group, in- sisted that modifying Article 16 — which states simply that Germany must ac- cept all those fleeing persecution in their native lands — is an essential first step in combating the plague of violence. Ms. Baumeister maintained that po- lice statistics show that "80 percent of asylum seekers are involved in some sort of criminal activity. In my district, 60 percent are in the drug business." Like other German officials, she also suggested that Germany is being un- fairly singled out for its handling of asy- lum seekers, the large majority of whom, she argued, are fleeing economic, not po- litical, persecution. And like almost every German offi- cial interviewed, she pointed to Wash- ington's treatment of Haitian refugees as far harsher than the Kohl govern- ment's proposed refugee policies. She rejected charges that the Kohl government would be encouraging far- right extremists by changing the con- stitution to meet their demands. "The best way to beat radicals on the right is to beat them at their own game," she said. "Our voters don't care who solves the problem. They just want the problem solved. If we can avoid economic instability, the neo-Nazis do not have a chance." But this focus on changing the con- stitution amounts to treating the symp- toms without dealing with the underlying disease itself, critics con- tend. "You can educate people — but you can't give in," said Karsten D. Voigt, the Social Democrats' foreign policy spokesman, who despite his rhetoric speaks for a party that now also offi- cially supports modifying the constitu- tion. "They (the CDU) gave in." Before amending the constitution, he said, efforts should be made to break the bureaucratic logjam that delays deci- sions on asylum cases for up to two years. Mr. Voigt also suggested that the CDU is deliberately clogging the asy- lum approval process to generate new pressure for amending Article 16. "I am convinced that most CDU lead- ers are more interested in their cam- paign to change the constitution than in finding solutions," he said. 'The Re- "Some Germans like to live in a Christian-oriented culture." — Gerd Langguth publicans could benefit from that con- flict. It's a dangerous game." Ms. Baumeister, the CDU Bundestag member, bristled at suggestions that the government simply wanted to remove the victims rather than tackle the deep- er problem of German racism. But she also suggested that the unwillingness of the Gypsies to assimilate has given new momentum to the far-right. That theme — the reluctance of Ger- mans to accept unassimilated minori- ties in their midst — was echoed over Hitler's Birthday: Police take a young neo-Nazi into custody following an outbreak of violence at a march held to celebrate the birthday of Adolf Hitler. and over again during the fact-finding trip. Dr. Gerd Langguth, representative of the Commission of the European Com- munities in Germany, argued that the pluralism of American culture is alien to Germany. "We don't have the same tradition that you have," he said, speaking over an elegant lunch at a Bonn hotel. "Some Germans like to live in a Christian-ori- ented culture. What they don't like is, like in Berlin, where there are non-Ger- man quarters." Foreigners, he implied, can be ac- cepted only if they assimilate into the broader German culture. But that can be hard in a society that — to outsiders — appears strongly tribal. Despite its liberal asylum policy — which the government now wants to change — Germany has no immigration policy. By law, foreigners remain outside the main- stream of German culture, even after several generations. Citizenship is vir- tually denied them. In fact, Germany has an undigested population of 6-million foreigners, many brought in as "guest workers" decades ago. Some now lead prosperous, successful lives; many more live on the margins of Germany's economic mira- cle, living reminders that German cul- ture is still a homogeneous one. Magid Subh is a refugee from Syria now living in the Potsdam refugee hos- tel who said his claim for asylum is based on his contention that he is a Palestinian, and therefore "stateless." Mr. Subh, who clearly delighted in talking to visiting Jewish journalists about his political predicament, spends his days doing chores in the hostel and chatting with other asylum seekers. "I tried to get a work permit, but I couldn't," he said. "Right now the biggest problem for me is that there is nothing to do. When a person cannot create any- thing in his life, he is not a human be- ing." His situation is characteristic of most of the 500,000 refugees who will enter Germany this year. He is relatively well cared for by the state, at least compared to the treatment received by refugees in other countries, and he knows that he will not be deported anytime soon. But he will never be fully welcomed into German society. It is unlikely he will find even a menial job, and his ap- pearance will always mark him as a for- eigner. Concluded Rabbi Stein in Berlin.: "The problem Germany faces is that it is very difficult for a democracy to de- fend itself with democratic means. What can a government do when there are free elections, and the conditions are such that these people (the right wing) have the pull to win votes? What can you do — go out and shoot them all?" ❑