A More Positive Outlook For Conservative Judaism LEONARD WANETIK he article on the Con- servative movement in last week's issue had two things wrong with it, from my perspective. First, it was a tad too pessimistic. Se- cond, it did not contain any- thing about Hillel Day School — an important part of each congregation's life — without which a discussion of Conser- -vative Judaism is incomplete at best. As for the first point, I com- pared the "Conservative" ar- ticle with the "Reform" arti- cle (April 10). The latter con- tained vignettes with real people who professed the warmth of their movement. I can assure you that similar vignettes abound in the Con- servative movement. The Conservative move- ment has come to realize that there is a great deal of vitali- ty which can be tapped in the lay community. Last year, Calvin Weiss and I attended the Imun Lay Religious In- stitute at Camp Ramah in the Berkshires on behalf of B'nai Moshe. There, we and 12 others spent 10 days studying intensively to assist the rab- binate (or perform many func- tions of the rabbinate in a rabbi's absence) in Conser- vative congregations. This year, at least one person from Detroit (from Beth Shalom) will be going. The days of stiffness and a "we/they" attitude between rabbis and their congrega- tions are winding down in Conservative Judaism. The days of partnership with rab- bis and congregants becom- ing more involved with daily ritual and congregational life are on the rise. This community has a number of active, committed Conservative Jews who study, form chavurot which . are cross-congregational, and en- gage in a full and meaningful life both as Jews and as citizens living in a non- Jewish culture. Dr. Joseph Lewis recently completed a Haggadah. Others are work- ing on similar projects. Still others have the crea- tion of a warm atmosphere in their shul as their only pro- ject. It is sad that some of them were not included in the interview. B'nai Moshe, as the article Leonard Wanetik is active at B'nai Moshe and has sent two children to Hillel Day School. indicated, is a case in point. We have not had a rabbi for over a year. Yet the congrega- tion has conducted study ses- sions, Friday evening services in congregants' homes, and completed the full ritual calendar. Members have undertaken to give the D'var Torah, introduce the Haf- torah, and study so that they may teach others. The congregation has grown together as it has grown in size. And the plann- ed educational program is an offshoot of this philosophy. The removal of one afternoon will be counterbalanced by having the family come to shul together and spend time together in a number of all- day Sunday programs throughout the year. We will The days of partnership and involvement are on the rise. grow from strength, and our children will not only be Jewish because they marry Jews, to quote Rabbi Schnipper. The subject of education brings me to Hillel Day School. How can one believe that the Conservative move- ment is in such deep trouble when we have a school which has more than doubled in size in under six years? The children who go to Hillel, it is true, come from Orthodox, Conservative and Reform backgrounds. But the vast majority are Conservative. Hillel is, and always has been, a part of the Conser- vative movement and its con- gregations. It is dedicated to teaching children how to learn to be Jews while living and participating in the world at large. It is one thing, for example, to teach a child only to shop in a grocery which has kosher food. It is quite another to teach, as Hillel does, how to identify kosher products in a large grocery store, how to make decisions among a wide variety of products, and how to keep your home kosher when you live in a non-kosher society. The education at Hillel pro- duces children who are not only acquainted with ritual but can, as recently happen- ed, carry out a one-and-a-half- hour play entirely in Hebrew. This is a standard part of the seventh-grade curriculum at Hillel, just as is study of Jewish values, Torah, pro- phets, mathematics, and English. These are Jews who are likely to do much more than merely marry other Jews. They are likely to study for the rabbinate, earn degrees in Jewish studies, go to shul regularly, and send their own children to Jewish day schools. Until recently, Hillel has often struggled to be recogniz- ed even among some of the Conservative congregations here. There has seemed to be a great deal of reluctance to "acknowledge" Hillel's ex- istence. Somehow, it seems, Hillel was seen as "com- peting" with the congrega- tional school. What has changed? Time has shown that the quality of education, the in- tensity of education, and the commitment of families who send their children to Hillel are healthy for every con- gregation and every Jew in Detroit. The number of families sending their children to Hillel Day School- is so great today that they are a substantial portion of every congregation's membership list. In recent developments, B'nai Moshe provides a sub- sidy for families who send their children to Hillel, and the board contains substan- tial representation by Hillel parents. Beth Shalom and Beth Abraham Hillel Moses have moved to formally in- clude Hillel in their decision process. The assistant rabbis from several congregations have been teaching at Hillel. Rab- bi Gershon from Shaarey Zedek is a candidate for the Hillel board of directors (Rab- bi Spectre has been on the board for a while). Cantor Klein and others have been preparing children for bar and bat mitzvah for years. With this much contact, how can Hillel be left out of anything having to do with the Conservative movement? These are but a few of the positive things going on in the Conservative community. Are there problems? You bet. Among other things, the lai- ty needs to become much more focused on study — on putting in the effort to under- stand its movement. But both Reform and Orthodoxy have problems at least as deep. The Reform movement's in- ternational conference in the last few months focused on issues such as dealing with spouses who have not con- verted, and the possible need to "evangelize!' Too many board members and officers in Reform congregations are not Jews, it seems. Orthodoxy is so fragmented it is difficult to tell the players without a scorecard. That ought to get a standard "we all believe in one Torah" letter in response. Conservative Jews have to stop making apologies for themselves. They have to stop defining themselves by what they are not, and focus on what they are. This process is well under way. With the help- of Hashem, it will continue and grow in intensity. Ex- periences such as those at Imun nationally, and B'nai Moshe, Hillel, and others locally, show that there is reason for optimism. ❑ The Factual Eulogy For Yassir Arafat PAULA R. STERN T he "almost" death of Yassir Arafat afforded us a unique opportuni- ty to set the record straight. Now, having experienced Arafat in the past tense, we know that he will be called "a father of his country!' and "the mother of a movement!' There are many names that I could attach to Arafat, but none of them would hint at a comparison to a Gandhi, King, Washington, or Ben-Gurion. So, now that we know Arafat is alive, perhaps we should examine the line and future plans of this "father/ mother!' What exactly has he sired in his lifelong quest -to establish a Palestinian state? We can credit him with the placing of Ma'alot in our hearts and history. We will never forget the sight of children bleeding and crying after being taken hostage and terrorized while on a school trip. Vienna has an airport we will never forget, for we saw Jewish bodies lying in pools of blood as a result of another of Arafat's brainstorms. If the Palestinian move- ment continues to recognize Arafat as their leader, our position must be made clear: with such a man as its father, it does not take much to understand why we reject the child. ❑ THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS 7