OPINION Jonathan Pollard: The 'Travesty Of U.S. Justice Continues KENNETH LASSON p erhaps the most sym- bolic of all Jewish holi- days, Passover above all celebrates redemption. This is the time to remember deliverance from Egypt, to ap- preciate the renewal of spring, to contemplate the meaning of freedom. For Jonathan Pollard, the American found guilty of passing classified information to Israel, Passover is even more poignant. Still three years shy of 40, he sits in solitary confinement in a maximum-security federal penitentiary, having been sentenced to life in prison with a recommendation that he never be paroled. No one, not even Pollard himself, argues his innocence — only about the severity and disparity of his punishment. Kenneth Lasson is a professor of law at the University of Baltimore. The average term given to those convicted of spying for hostile foreign countries is 12 years; for giving secret data to friendly nations, four. Last month came a split decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The two judges in the majority — wholly through an analysis of procedural technicalities that even law professors will find hard to fathom — rejected Pollard's petition to have his term reduced. "The issue before us is not whether a life sentence was appropriate punishment for Pollard's crime," they wrote, "still less whether we ourselves would have impos- ed such a sentence." Unfor- tunately for Pollard, their cold dissection of legalistic niceties simply missed the forest for the trees. Not so their colleague, Judge Steven Williams, who perceived with crystal clarity the plain injustice of Pollard's plight. His sharply dissenting opinion fairly rang with its determination to avoid ex- alting form over substance, to focus instead upon the issue of fundamental fairness. Judge Williams found that the government reneged on each of the explicit promises it had made to Pollard in return for his cooperation — in particular, that the pro- secutors broke their promise to ask the court for something less than the maximum sentence. The government engaged in "a flagrant viola- tion of the agreement's spirit" when it presented highly pre- judicial and inflammatory memoranda from then- Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger — documents that Pollard's attorneys were not pei-mitted to challenge. It was Judge Williams alone who perceived the gross injustice that should have been rectified here, even given the narrow procedural difficulties in whose web his Jonathan Pollard: Six years in prison. fellow judges found them- selves inextricably bound. Judge Williams also recognized that to allow "nig- gling" interpretations of plea agreements would render them virtually useless to future prosecutors. "If fulfill- ment of the promise is to mean anything, it cannot refer only to the promise pared to its literal bone." In other words, the government will never be trusted if it is permitted to weasel out of bargains ostensibly based on good faith. We may never know what went on between Pollard's prosecutors and the State Project Achim Reaches Out To Emigres To Help Them Adjust To Life In America PHIL JACOBS Managing Editor hink for a couple -of minutes here. Seriously, step away from the outside clutter and set yourself apart. Let's pre- tend that you and your fami- ly have made the most im- portant decision of your lives. Tomorrow, you'll begin the paperwork to leave your country. When you start the ap- plication, the clerk at the bureau of this-and-that will give you that knowing look. Some of your friends will call you crazy. You've got it good here, for a Jew. You make $65 a month and live with your in-laws in a one- bedroom apartment. So, it's a roof over your head, and you have an education to fall back on. But enough is enough. There's got to be something better than this, you think. People here would probably line up for a daily dose of hope, if there was any left. We know of a family who left. The husband was a dec- orated military pilot, even though he was a Jew. The wife was a physician. An- nouncing their intentions to T leave the country, they were deemed automatic "enemies of the state." The husband was demoted to bus driver; the wife cleaned bedpans. After a year in their new country, the couple still worked menial jobs. But the husband showed us photographs and told us what was so remarkable. The photos were of a vaca- tion drive to Disney World. But the great part wasn't Mickey Mouse or Epcot. "I was able to get into my car with my family and drive wherever I wanted," he said. "Nobody checked me for pa- pers; nobody wanted a des- tination. Nobody looked at me funny because I was a Jew. But in the Soviet Union, I didn't even know what a Jew did; yet I was one. Here, I can be Jewish. I can travel; I can work; I can be an American Jew." Soviet emigres are to our society what many of our grandparents were to their time. They are refugees in a new land with a new lang- uage, facing new challenges. We've read many times of the miracle that brought them here. It's important now that we don't ever fall into a malaise in which we take that miracle for granted. There are programs here in Detroit that keep the dream alive for our new Americans. It's not easy to put ourselves in their place. But there is one program that quietly is doing the job in a deep, personal way without getting much fan- fare. Project Achim offers a Jewish identity here in If a person doesn't know how freedom works, it can cost him his Jewishness; it can cost him his life. Detroit to the new Ameri- cans. It does so in a quiet, but urgent way. Urgent, be- cause there are new Ameri- cans who are finding that along with new American freedoms come dangerous American forms of self- destruction. New Americans aren't sheltered from Detroit area problems. Project Achim meets new Americans and helps them with their adjustment. There are programs that match the emigres with a so- cial worker, programs that pair a high school student with a Jewish American high school student. Nobody is asking anyone to become more religious. Instead, Pro- ject Achim adds a Jewish identity to the lives of those Jews who don't have one or who are searching for one. On May 4, Rabbi Shaiall Zachariash, one of the quiet workers of the project, will be honored at a parlor meeting at the home of Dr. Philip Friedman. There is still so much work to be done helping the Soviets learn how to become Jewish Americans. Stage One was to secure their freedom and get them here. For that we are grateful. Stage Two is helping them adjust to their new freedoms. Because as the volunteers for Project Achim can tell you, freedom is costly. If a person doesn't know how freedom works, it can cost him his Jewishness; it can cost him his life. The idea is to keep one's eye on the goal and the pur- pose for coming to this coun- try. This is what Project Achim is doing. This is the help that the emigres now need. ❑ Department, not among the judges behind their chamber doors. But there had to have been considerable high drama and heated disputes. Ordinarily judges in the ma- jority do not cite (nor defend themselves against) specific arguments raised in dissen- ting opinions. That they did so here, and on more than one occasion, indicates the depth of their disagreement. As in the book of Exodus, the biases and fallibility of human judges are bound up in dramatic paradoxes. It is ironic, to say the least, that - the two majority judges (Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Charles Silberman) are Jewish and that Williams is not, and that the appeal was heard on Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year. It is no less incongruous that Israel, the prime beneficiary of Pollard's classified data about Iraq's chemical and nuclear capability, refused him the asylum of its embassy — nor, for that matter, that the Jewish people, whose latest incarnation as a state can be dated to the liberation of Buchenwald 50 years-ago, are still seeking a secure place in the community of nations some 3,000 years after their deliverance from Egypt. Such ironies, though, are the stuff of punditry and conjecture. Few Americans, Jewish or otherwise, would liken Pollard to Macbeth, but Judge Williams did. The case reminded him "of Macbeth's curse against the witches whose promises — and their sophistical interpretations of them — led him to doom. `And be these juggling friends no more believ'd, That palter with us in a double sense; That-keep the word of promise to our ear, And break it to our hope? " The sadder, more demon- strable irony is that Jonathan Pollard must celebate this season of hope still waiting for redemption and deliverance, still gazing out upon the flowers of spring through the iron bars of a sweltering prison cell. ❑ THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS 7