BACKGROUND HELEN DAVIS Foreign Correspondent A s Israel prepares to embark on a new year, the reverbera- tions of the trauma from the Persian Gulf War are still being felt and their conse- quences continue to dominate the regional agen- da. The defeat of Iraq, the demise of the Soviet Union and the emergence of the United States as a super- power manifestly prepared to exert its muscle have combined to radically change the political map of the Middle East. Syria, the most obdurate of Israel's enemies, is ready to talk; the Gulf states are prepared to abandon their economic boycott; the Palestine Liberation Organ- ization has suffered a polit- ical calamity equivalent in size and scope to the military defeat inflicted on its Iraqi ally. Within hours of the end of the Gulf War, Secretary of State James Baker had leapt through the window of op- portunity, moving swiftly to capitalize on the changed perceptions and the emer- ging new realities. During six diplomatic shuttles, he relentlessly ma- neuvered the various pieces around the board, skilfully juggled their sensitivities, inexorably drew them closer to his intended goal. Next week, he is scheduled to return to the region for a triumphal seventh visit — not to negotiate, this time, but to present his Middle East interlocutors with the fruits of his labor: Invita- tions to a peace conference, probably in Geneva in late October or early November. For the first time since the Jewish state was established in 1948, all of its Arab neighbors have signaled their willingness to respond positively to the call for direct, bilateral negotia- tions, a formula that Israel's leaders have been enun- ciating for 43 years. So when Israelis welcome the New Year on Sunday night they will not, as they did last year and on so many previous years, face the imminent threat of war, but rather the realistic prospect of peace. 4 • " Artwork by D. B. Johnson. Copyright. 1991. D. B. Johnson. Distributed by Los Angeles Ttrnes Syndicate. The Most Painful Sacrifice Of All For the peace conference to succeed, Israel will have to give up territories it has held since 1967. No one doubts that this process will be without pain or peril. It will involve tough negotiations, strains with its adversaries, tensions with its friends. It will also pro- voke bitter internal debates, personal recriminations, po- litical schisms and even, perhaps, the collapse of the government. But ultimately, if real peace is to be attained, Israel will be required to make the most painful sacrifice of all. It will have to relinquish precious territory whose conquest has cost hundreds of Israeli lives, but whose retention may yet be even more costly in both human and economic terms. Israel will not be required to recklessly abandon its vital security interests. It will not, for example, be ex- pected to evacuate the Golan Heights without firm guar- antees of demilitarization, similar to those which ac- companied the evacuation of the Sinai Desert and which ensure the territory is never again used as a launch pad for attacks on Israel. No one subscribes to the view that the Arab world has experienced a blinding The decision to withdraw from territories will demand nerves of steel from Israel's leaders. revelation that has convinc- ed it of the justice of Israel's cause. But there are grounds to suggest that the demise of the Soviet Union and the resolution shown by the United States have had a powerful effect. The shock of the Gulf War has introduced a note of cold reality, persuading the Arab leaders that there are only benefits to be derived from cooperation with Washing- ton and only futility in pur- suing the military option against a seemingly invinci- ble Israel. That is far from enough to allow Israel to relax its guard, still less anticipate the imminent arrival of a golden age of good neighborliness, but there is now the hope that it can at least achieve a broadening of the grudging, cold peace that has marked its relations with Egypt for the past 12 years. To achieve this, however, Israel will be required — not only by the Arabs, but by virtually the entire interna- tional community — to make substantial territorial con- cessions. It will be an act of extraor- dinary difficulty for Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, contradicting every fiber of his ideological soul and tear- ing at his most revered ar- ticles of faith. At 76, Mr. Shamir has spent his life fighting — against the Nazis, against the British, against the Arabs. Yet the demands that will be made on him and his government in the upcoming negotiations will pose awesome options at the very moment when Israel is seek- ing the means to absorb the hundreds of thousands of Soviet immigrants who have already arrived and the hundreds of thousands more who will arrive in the com- ing year, possibly the last great wave of Jewish im- migration. Israel undoubtedly has both the military power and the political will to resist the pressure and hold on to the territories, but it lacks the economic strength to realize its most cherished dream of providing houses, jobs and education for immigrants. As long as Israel's security concerns are fully met, therefore, the urgent imperatives of the moment will make territorial conces- sions almost inevitable — whatever the political price and the personal pain — if negotiations actually reach that point. The offer that the Israeli government, even the Likud government, may be unable to refuse in the coming year could very well be a ter- ritorial withdrawal in exchange for the promise of assistance that will enable the Jewish state to suc- cessfully absorb one million new immigrants from the Soviet Union, coupled with solid assurances of recog- nized and defensible borders. The decision to withdraw from territories occupied in the 1967 Six Day War — ter- ritories that were originally intended as bargaining chips for future peace negotiations — will demand nerves of steel and huge quantities of personal and political courage. But given the benefits that are likely to accrue to Israel — the realization of a Zionist endeavor of truly historic proportions —territorial compromise might not, after all, be too high a price to pay. 0 THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS 43