EDITORIAL The Kremlin Crunch The stunning news of the coup in the Soviet Union was particularly disturbing to a Jewish community that has worked tirelessly for the emigration of Soviet Jews and peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Whatever his motives, Mikhail Gor- bachev has brought major reforms to Soviet society, leading toward increased democracy and the right of Soviet Jews to emigrate. He also has worked with the United States in recent weeks toward the co-sponsorship of a Mideast peace conference in which the par- ties would meet face to face. Diplomatic rela- tions between Israel and the USSR, severed in 1967, were about to be restored. Now, a cloud of doubt hovers over the Kremlin, though at press time it appeared that the coup had collapsed. There is even speculation that reform and democracy will move ahead more rapidly. Indeed, for the first time in Soviet Dry Bones history, it appeared that the will of the Soviet people had prevailed over those who would oppress them. Still, there are far more questions than answers at this point. Who will lead the Soviet Union: Boris Yeltsin, who has emerged as the hero of democratic reform in standing up to those who plotted the coup? Mr. Gorbachev, as before? Or some new form of leadership? Regardless, the lesson for American Jews is that the Soviet Union is unstable and that we must never relax in our efforts to rescue Soviet Jewry. Attempts to restore Jewish life in the USSR, no matter how well intentioned, should not be given priority over the primary goal: evacuation of as many Soviet Jews as possible. Amidst the turmoil, we must remain focus- ed in our support of the rights of Soviet Jews to emigrate, and to do whatever we can to speed up that process. We may not have another chance. ReGIGIoUS CRAZIES A* mip.ast - Under Gorbachev, The Gates Opened During the past six years since Mikhail Gorbachev assumed leadership of the USSR, 399,621 Jews emigrated from the Soviet Union. This was 61 percent of the Jews who left the country since the contemporary movement to allow Jews to emigrate began in 1968, according to the National Con- ference of Soviet Jewry. In the year before Mr. Gorbachev became general secretary of the Communist Party in March, 1985, only 896 Jews emigrated. By 1988, this had crept to 18,965. In 1989, 71,217 left. An all-time record for Soviet Jewish emigration was set last year when 186,815 boarded planes bound toward the west. "The emigration doors that have open- ed since 1989 were clearly because of Gor- bachev, perestroika and glasnost," said Mar- tin Wenick, executive director of the Na- tional Conference on Soviet Jewry. "His motivations," said Mr. Wenick, "have been to create a country ruled by law, to abide by the Helsinki accords and to curry favor with the West. He knew that Western governments, especially the United States, had been a tiger on the issue of Jewish emigration, and that he could get economic concessions by allowing more Jews to leave the USSR." ❑ LETTERS Oak Park Election Coverage Unfair In your last three issues, you have published articles by three different reporters, all in support of the Orthodox Jewish candidates for City Council in the City of Oak Park. One article was prior to the primary election, and two came after. I have always regarded The Jewish News as a publication of and for the entire Jewish population of our area. I, too, am Jewish and have been ac- tive over the years in my con- gregation where my wife's family membership goes back over 100 years. I have never been approach- ed by any of your writers for any of my views on any issues in the City of Oak Park. I have served the city in one 6 FRIDAY, AUGUST 23, 1991 capacity or another since 1972. I have been on the City Council since 1985, and we have always been responsive to the needs and desires of the Orthodox community. I believe your policies need to be reviewed so that you can serve the entire Jewish community. Raymond M. Abrams Oak Park Raymond Abrams Has Been Slighted Regarding the article by Lesley Pearl, Aug. 8, on the Oak Park election, it would seem to me, according to Ms. Pearl, the only people worthy of an interview, or for that matter, election, are Brauns- tein and Seligson. (Is this because they happen to be Or- thodox Jews?) What of the views of Mr. Abrams, the incumbent? Wouldn't it have been nice to discuss the views of this primary? I believe you would find a man totally immersed in the needs of ALL people, not just a certain minority. (A minority that Mr. Abrams also happens to be a part of?) . Richard Jasgur Oak Park The Race For The Presidency In your editorial of Aug. 16, you show concern that only one Democratic candidate has announced for president. I share your concern but not your conclusion. You call the Democratic Party in disarray. The Democratic Party con- LETTERS trols the U.S. House, the Senate, the majority of gover- nors, as well as the majority of state assemblies. As to potential candidates for presi- dent, there are currently six governors and senators con- sidering making the race. It is likely that half of those will in fact enter. Adding in Mr. Tsongas would result in four candidates, which is sufficient. While President Bush has to be considered the favorite, he is not invincible. Given a strong nominee, the Democrats could make a race of it. Harvey Bronstein Southfield Bar-Bat Mitzvah: Morning After There is nothing that ex- cites me more than a bar or bat mitzvah ceremony. Its sights and smells are affec- ting. The warm, convivial at- mosphere and cheerful banter engendered by old friends and family separated by distance and circumstance who come together for the simcha; the festive flowers, balloons and band and the spectacular pagentry of colors that adorn the day; the smiling joy of the young boy or girl who, having ventured on his or her own to perform in public for the first time, feels now the trium- phant afterglow of a job well done .. . And, yet, the morning after, the flowers have withered, balloons have burst, and the bar mitzvah boy or bat mitz- vah girl is gone, not to be seen or heard from again at the synagogue for some time to come. Some lament this bitter truth that all synagogues confront. It has been argued that the bar or bat mitzvah rite is no longer apt or ap- propriate. It sends now the wrong messages. It is suppos- ed to symbolize the beginning of a new, more meaningful phase of Jewish religious practice and experience. But, instead, it conveys that the child's religious education has reached a definite limit, a discernible end. Along these lines, a notion of staggering the bar or bat mitzvah celebration to a later date in the life of the celebrant, either at the age of 16 or 18, has gained some cur- rency, in that it would en- courage a few more years of sustained Jewish religious education. To me, though, that is not the answer. Traditionally, the bar or bat mitzvah ceremony is a rite of passage, marking a coming of age, a point of maturity. The bar mitzvah should not, therefore, be upended at the risk of compromising the in- Continued on Page 12 N