EDUCATION Are Jewish Day School Students More Ethical? IRA RIFKIN Special to The Jewish News os Angeles — Jerry Friedman is an educa- tional consultant and Jewish community leader who believes that Jewish day schools — be they Orthodox, Conservative or Reform — fail to deliver as advertised when it comes to moral edu- cation. At best, he says, the level of moral education in the aver- age day school is question- able. At worst, he adds, it is a major disappointment. "A moral and ethical per- sonality is not an inevitable by-product of a Jewish educa- tion," Friedman says. "At most, students are memoriz- ing values, not internalizing them. And we know that memorization just hangs on the shelf for a few months and then is lost." Friedman's concern is not that Jewish day schools are turning out immoral young people. Nor does he think that day school students are any less ethically evolved than their public school counterparts from similar economic and social back- grounds. Instead, his disappoint- ment stems from his belief that parents should expect more from Jewish day schools; that the moral at- tainment of day school stu- dents should be higher because of the emphasis the schools place on Jewish ethical values. "If a quality public school does just as good a job teaching ethics and morality, then aside from the question of promoting Jewish identity, is the Jewish day school real- ly worth it?" Friedman says. "Jewish schools need to do more than produce scholars. The desired goal should be menschlichkeit." But for that to happen, ac- cording to Friedman, day schools need to move beyond their traditional ways of in- stilling an appreciation for L Ira Rifkin is assistant editor of the Baltimore Jewish Times. ethical thought and behavior in young people. In today's complex world, he maintains, Thrall study, mitzvah projects and ethical role models are no longer enough. What is needed is inno- vative curricula specifically designed to increase the stu- dent's capacity to reach ethical conclusions on their own, he believes. Friedman's assessment of Jewish day schools is based on his own research con- ducted with a sampling of upper-middle class seventh graders randomly selected from three Jewish day schools — Orthodox, Conser- vative and Reform — and one public school. For reasons of confidentiality, Friedman will oily say that the study was conducted in a "large Western city" (although other sources interviewed said it was Los Angeles). His research showed little statistical difference between the moral reasoning levels of the day school and public school students. When tested following a 17-week period during which Friedman worked with the students for one hour each week to in- crease their ethical reasoning skills, both day school stu- dents and public school stu- dents showed improvement. Originally, Friedman had thought that the day school students would show a marked improvement over the public school students, and that this might reveal "latent moral sensibilities" that could be attributed to their being in a Jewish en- vironment that stressed ethi- cal behavior. But this did not prove to be the case. "Apparently," he wrote in the Fall 1987 issue of Jewish Education, a quarterly jour- nal in which he first reported on his study, "the prerequisite skills of moral reasoning were not developed in any of the Jewish day school groups re- gardless of the hours spent in moral education." Friedman maintains that what he is saying should come as no surprise, at least to educators. All he is doing, he says, is stating publicly — and with some statistical back up — what most day school educators dare only admit privately. "No one is going to admit that their school is failing in this regard, but off-the-record (day school administrators and teachers) all say what I say." A "great many" day school educators are "painfully aware" that their students cheat and are otherwise dis- honest, disrespectful and in- sensitive to teachers and peers, he says. If the 60-year-old Fried- man's approach to Jewish education is unconventional, so is his background. A native New Yorker, he started out as an accountant, "had the mazal," as he put it, to be- come a highly successful developer of commercial and industrial real estate, and did not obtain the academic cre- dentials required for serious consideration in the field of education until he was in his mid-50s. However, he has long been deeply involved in Jewish affairs, on both local and na- tional levels. Friedman cur- rently serves on the executive committee of the National Council of Jewish Federations and as vice president of the Jewish Federation Council of Los Angeles. He is a member of the board of directors of the Jewish Education Service of North America and has served on various Los Angeles federation boards and commissions concerned with Jewish education, immi- grant involvement and ref- ugee settlement, community planning and other issues. His interest in Jewish edu- cation, he explains during an interview in his small, Bever- ly • Hills office — which is filled with Eskimo art and possesses an exquisite view of the Santa Monica Mountains — began in the 1960s when he lived in Montreal and sought to enroll his daughter in school. "I put her into what was considered to be the top Jewish day school. Aca- "Jewish schools need to do more than produce scholars. The desired goal should be `menschlichkeit.'" — Jerry Friedman demically, it was great. But it lacked a caring environment. That's when I became con- cerned," says Friedman, who describes himself as "liberal or centrist Orthodox." Despite his late arrival on the scene, Friedman has quickly assumed a leading role among educators con- cerned with ethical develop- ment in Jewish settings. He lectures and puts on seminars and workshops at Harvard, the University of California at Los Angeles and elsewhere around the country and in Israel, and he has attracted the interest of some of this nation's leading Jewish educators. One nationally known booster is Alvin I. Schiff, ex- ecutive vice president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York. "Jerry deserves major attention," Schiff says in an interview. "There is nobody else out there dealing with Jewish education with the focus that Jerry has." Jay Braverman, elemen- tary school educational direc- tor at Yeshiva of Flatbush, a 1,400-pupil Orthodox day , school in Brooklyn, New York, says Friedman's work is important because it links traditional Jewish values to contemporary, every-day situations involving ethical choices. Friedman's analysis of the moral state of Jewish day school students is based on the theories of the late Lawrence Kohlberg, with whom he studied at Harvard. Kohlberg taught that suc- cessful moral education must THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS 93