Invitations Redux There are two versions of this tale, both with approximately the same ending. In the first version, the mother of the bride is ready to mail out the invitations, all properly addressed by the calligrapher. She takes them to the post office; has one weighed; buys and attaches the postage the postal worker tells her is required; and mails them out. Within a few days, the invitations start coming back to her — stamped "insufficient postage:" Moral of this version: always have the invitations weighed at a minimum of two different post offices to make sure of the postage. In the second version, the mother of the bride is to blame. She takes the invitations to the post office and has one weighed, but without the reserva- tion card from the hotel and the mimeographed map which is being in- cluded in the invitations sent to all out-of-town guests. Before sealing and mailing the invitations, she inserts these items, not realizing that their weight will increase the postage. With- in a few days, the out-of-town invita- tions start coming back to her — stamped "insufficient postage:' Moral of this version: always have the invita- tion weighed with all the insertions. Caught In The Act The father of the bride brings the balance of what he owes the caterer with him to the reception, several thousand dollars in cash in an envel- ope. He arrives at the reception while the crew is still setting up. Being a helpful sort, he puts the envelope in the inside pocket of his tux jacket, which he drapes over a chair while he assists the crew. A few minutes later, when he returns to the chair and reaches into his jacket pocket, the envelope is gone. The father manages to pay the caterer with a check and the recep- tion goes on. A few weeks later, the father gets a call from the photog- rapher who was hired to videotape the wedding. "I've got something in- teresting to show you," he tells the Lather. The photographer, who had gone to the reception early in order to videotape it from set-up to end, brings the just-developed video to the father's house, puts it in the VCR and turns it on. And there, on video, is the per- son who walked over to the father's tux jacket, flipped it back and took out the cash-filled envelope. Who is the thief? The father of the groom. 26 Brides 1990