TORAH PORTION THE CULTURAL COMMISSION of CONGREGATION IYNAI DAVID Cordially Invites You to Hear A Means Of Atonement Greater Than Sacrifice RABBI RICHARD HERTZ Special to The Jewish News T he first thing one no- tices when reading the Torah portion this week is the elaborate descrip- tion of the ancient ritual for sacrifices. Why does the Torah go into detail about rituals like the burnt offerings, the meal offering, the sin offering, the guilt offering, the offering of ordination and the sacrifice of well-being? What's behind all this? What do sacrifices of animals have to do with being religious or spiritually com- mitted to God? Throughout the ages, at- tempts have been made to find a spiritual meaning for the sacrificial system describ- ed in Leviticus. Nearly all directions for these sacrifices Tzav Shabbat Parah: Leviticus 6:1-8:36, Numbers 19:1-22, Ezekiel 36:16-38 have ceased to function in our time. Once the Temple was destroyed, the rules for sacrifices lost relevance to one's spiritual and moral con- duct. Most modern Jews regard these sacrificial prac- tices as out of date. They do not want or expect them to be revived. Yet, to appreciate the mean- ing of this sedra, one must go back to ancient times when sacrificial cults were a part of all religions, especially those of Semitic peoples. Sacrifice as evolved by the ancient Israelites was a gift to God to show the worshiper's obedience. For the ancient Semites, however, sacrifice was primarily a means of establishing a close relation- ship with the deity. Blood played an important part in the ritual. The blood of sacrificial animals was sprinkled upon the altar. In those days, blood was regard- ed the seat of life. It served as the sacramental uniting of man with the deity. Both man and the deity shared in the eating of the flesh of the sacrifice, thus making it a sacramental meal. From earliest times, people felt the need to offer something precious to their gods, sometimes as an expression of gratitude, sometimes as a way Richard Hertz is rabbi emeritus of Temple Beth El. MAJ. GENERAL of speaking to the mysterious gods who were frequently hostile, as well as beneficent. The Torah tried to wean the Israelites away from such pagan, cultic practices. After the destruction of the Temple, the ancient Israelites freed themselves from the idea of sacrifice as a means of uniting them with God. In- stead, they made the sacrifice a symbol of service. Earlier, the prophets denounced sacrifice as an institution un- suited to a spiritual concept of God. The prophets bitterly re- jected the sacrificial cult of their times and sought a wor- ship of God based on devotion and righteous acts of social justice and loving kindness. The prophets railed against the sacrificial system. Amos, in his classic sermon (Amos 5:22-25), said that God desires not burn offerings, meal offer- ings or sacrifices of fat beasts, but rather, "Let justice roll down like water and righteousness like a peren- nial stream." Likewise, Jeremiah and Isaiah, Hosea and Micah, all spoke to the question of whether God wants burnt offerings or righteous conduct. They feared ritual would be substituted for morality. In the early period of biblical history, sacrifices could be offered anywhere. Only later was this limited to the Temple in Jerusalem. The first seven chapters of Leviticus describe in minute detail the manner of the sacrifices. Strict regulations provided that only animals without blemish could be used. The biblical theory of sacrifice is the basis for a talmudic treatment of the subject. Even though the Temple • had been destroyed and the sacrificial cult in Judaism had come to an end, the sacrifices were elaborate- ly discussed, perhaps in the hope that the Temple might one day be restored. Later, as this hope vanished, the feel- ing grew that prayer, fasting and even suffering took the place of sacrificial offerings. The philosopher Philo, who lived in Alexandria at the beginning of the Christian era, tried to seek out a spiritual meaning of the sacrificial cult by explaining these laws to be symbolic and allegorical. Philosophers later felt that sacrifices were symbols of man's gratitude to God and his dependence on Him. Maimonides, on the other SHLOMO GAZIT Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Tel Aviv University and 1989 Detroit Zionist Federa- tion Scholar in Residence. on "The Arab-Israeli Conflict" 11:00 A.M. Sunday, March 26, 1989 at CONGREGATION B'NAI DAVID 24350 Southfield Road Southfield, Michigan 48075 557-8210 Question and Answer Period • No Chorge • The Community is Invited Sisterhood of Temple Beth El presents 'A SPRING HAPPENING" THE GREAT PRETENDERS Monday, April 10, 1989 • Babysitting available • Luncheon 12:00 • Boutiques 10:00 Reservations by March 29 $25.00 Per Person Proceeds to help fund 'Temple Beth El's program for students with speCial needs. For information call Tempile Beth El 851-1100 Tables • Desks Wall Units Bedrooms Dining Rooms 10 Years Experience & Expertise in the Design of Affordable Laminate, Lucite & Wood Furniture For Appt. Call Muriel Wetsman 661-3838 d THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS 43