COMMENT The J.C.C. Center for Jewish Creativity and Exploration in cooperation with el€W5 dtib Messianic , Jew s For Jesus? PRESENT • - THE MISSIONARIES AMONG US: THE TARGET IS YOU! February 12, 1989, 2:30 P.M. Jewish Community Center Maple and Drake West Bloomfield AN ALERT AND INFORMED JEWISH COMMUNITY IS THE BEST DEFENSE: • SEE STARTLING MISSIONARY TRAINING VIDEOS • HEAR AN INFORMATIVE COUNTER-MISSIONARY REPORT • HAVE YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS DISTURBING PROBLEM ANSWERED. EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS NO CHARGE REFRESHMENTS For more information call: Stuart Rogoff, C.J.C.E. Director at 661-1000, ext. 267 or JEWS FOR JUDAISM At 968-JEWS JEWISH SINGLES For Selective Dating Call LO-LA The Dating Service Try our complimentary interview strictly confidential P.O. Box 254 Lathrup Village, MI 48076 356-0949 Claire Arm Mildred Rosenbaum SINGLES Don't leave it to chance! My unique and successful person-to- person' approach is not a dating service. It is for serious, intelligent and successful individuals who prefer discreet and dignified introduction for a long-lasting relationship and best marriage potential. Based on the SUCCESS of Traditional Matchmaking Guaranteed membership until marriage. Love & Marriage Personal Introduction Service Inc. 851-9955 Zahava Shalom 100 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1989 Washington Could Gain From Israel's Kahan Inquiry BEZALEL GORDON Special to The Jewish News T he recent develop- ments that led in- dependent prosecutor Walsh to move for dismissal of the most serious charges against Oliver North should please no one. Those who would like to see North punished to the full extent of the law can only gnash their teeth in frustration, while those who consider the col- onel a hero would prefer that all the charges be dropped. And all American taxpayers are losers, as the astronomical legal costs con- tinue to soar. Everyone understands the need to balance legitimate interests of national security with constitutional rights guaranteeing fairness in the judicial process. But is the Ad- ministration taking advan- tage of its powers of classifica- tion in order to quash the pro- secution's case and avoid potentially embarrassing revelations? And, recalling that this trial follows long after, and covers much the same ground as, two other ex- pensive exercises (the Tower Commission and Congress' Iran-Contra hearings), is there perhaps a better, quicker, more efficient way of getting at the truth, while not letting wrongdoers off the hook? There is, indeed: the Israeli model. Exactly six years ago this month, Israel released the final report' of the Kahan Commission, officially known as The State of Israel Com- mission of Inquiry into the Events at the Refugee Camps in Beirut (the massacre in Sabra and Shatilla). Like the Agranat Commission before it (which investigated the debacle of the Yom Kippur War), its conclusions were fraught with military, political and personal im; plications. Both commissions combined elements of the in- quiries of the Tower Commis- sion and the joint Senate- House committee, as well as of a courtroom trial. In Israel, a single commission does it all, and the country is ready to move on to other business. In Washington, however, such investigations represent a booming "industry," with Bezalel Gordon, who now lives in Washington, was the official spokesman for the Kahan Commission. U.S. taxpayers footing the bill. This duplication (tripli- cation?), as well as the strain of constant, damaging press leaks, contrast most unfavor- ably to the efficient and leak- proof operation run by the Kahan Commission. With the activities of the in- dependent counsel now tak- ing center stage, the congres- sional committee findings are already a fading memory. And who these days even re- members the Tower Commis- sion?) Yet it is the nearly forgotten Tower Commission that was most significant for the purposes of bureaucratic change (perhaps especially so since its chairman is the in- coming secretary of defense). It was certainly a rare event in American history. The Kahan Commission was truly a combination of all the scattered commotion that has been _consuming Washington for months on end. Israeli authorities, on the other hand, not only spon- sored a soul-wrenching film about the still fresh and hot- ly debated Lebanon war, but the Israeli people demanded accountability all the way to the top, scant hours after the gruesome pictures from Sabra and Shatilla exploded on tele- vision screens around the world. The Kahan Commis- sion verdicts were delivered in less than five months after the sad event it investigated — that includes a period of stonewalling by then Prime Minister Begin before he was pressured by public opinion into appointing the commis- sion. . The Kahan Commission was truly a combination of all the scattered commotion that has been consuming Wash- ington for months on end. The same commission in Jerusalem ran both open and closed hearings, sometimes on the same day, depending on the sensitivity of the testimony to be heard at that session. It had the power to subpoena the highest office- holders in the land, and it did. Prime Minister Begin, De- fense Minister Sharon and . Foreign Minister (now Pre- mier) Shamir all made ap- pearances in public hearings and in camera. Israel does not grant the sanctuary of a Fifth Amendment; but the provi- sion for the option (including at the request of the witness) of closed hearings effectively dispenses with excuses for not testifying completely and with the candor expected of trusted government officials and public servants. The witnesses whose repu- tations and careers were on the line were treated with consummate fairness, even without resort to constitu- tional protection (Israel does not have a written constitu- tion). When the commission had gathered its first round of evidence, it moved into a sec- ond, more legalistic phase, employing a two-pronged ap- proach which obviated the need for conferring immuni- ty from prosecution. The Kahan Commission issued formal letters of warning to nine cabinet ministers and army officers, advising them that the panel was likely to render an adverse judgment with regard to their roles in the affair and urging them to retain defense counsel. The Israeli equivalents of Bren- dan Sullivan were summari- ly hired. When all the final argu- ments were heard, the three commissioners retired to deliberate, and not a word leaked prematurely to the media before the report was officially released. There was suspense, but no lack of con- fidence in the basic workings and soundness of the national security apparatus. The Kahan Commission crafted thorough prescrip- tions for reforming bureau- cratic channels; it also made operative recommendations concerning individuals which the cabinet adopted and implemented quickly and cleanly — including the re- moval of Defense Minister Sharon from his post. This drastic action did provoke street demonstrations, with some unfortunate attendant violence. But the interna- tional community, in the form of universal editorial com- ment, reacted in the winter and spring of 1988 with an unprecedented outpouring of respect and praise for a pro- cess that sought — and achieved — introspective jus- tice, no matter who had to pay the political price. -4