I CLOSE-UP Ambiguity Yassir Arafat may have failed to meet U.S. and Israeli conditions for negotiation, but his Geneva speech is almost certain to be divisive. conference for peace in the Middle East on the basis of Resolutions 242 and 338 . . ." Arafat also said that the Palestine National Council had "reaffirmed its rejection of terrorism in all its forms, including state terrorism," but stop- ped short of recognizing Israel's right to exist. But while he missed his main target — convincing the U.S. ad- ministration that the PLO was an ac- ceptable partner for dialogue — his address will certainly have far- reaching repercussions. It will widen divisions within the American Jewish community and elsewhere in the Diaspora between those who believe that the time has come for the Israeli government to be more flexible in its search for peace and those who oppose breaking ranks at almost any cost. It will exacerbate still further the tensions between Diaspora "peace" groups and the Israeli government, which is unalterably opposed to dialogue with the PLO in any form. If Arafat had intended to weaken Israel diplomatically and isolate it from its friends — thus making it more vulnerable to superpower pressures — he has probably scored a significant victory. A HELEN DAVIS Special to The Jewish News Yassir Arafat: Divide and conquer. lit l assir Arafat must have known that his- address to the United Nations General Assembly in Geneva Tuesday would not melt the hearts of Israel's leaders. Indeed, the Israelis had printed the press releases explaining their re- jection of Arafat's speech fully 24 hours before the PLO leader had arrived in Geneva and before they even knew the details of his address. In a powerful, , often passionate speech to the U.N. General Assembly, the PLO leader spoke directly to "courageous and honorable Jewish people . . . who recognize the equal rights of our people to life, freedom and independence." Apparently attempting to drive wedges between Israel and the other members of the United Nations and between the Israeli government and people, Arafat attached "the Israeli government's policy of repression, massacres, expansion, settlement and expulsion," saying, "We distinguish between the Jewish citizen whom the Israeli ruling circles have continuous- ly sought to disinform and mislead, and the practices of the leaders of Israel:' For the world community of na- tions, he spelled out a three-point- peace plan. His "Palestinian peace in- itiative" called for a "serious effort" to convene an international peace conference on the Middle East under the auspices of the United Nations and place the Palestinian territories currently occupied by Israel under UN supervision. In return, the PLO would pledge to stive for a "com- prehensive settlement among the parties in the Arab-Israeli dispute, including the state of Palestine, Israel and other neighbors, within the framework of the international bove all, the address, with its powerful direct message to Israel citi- zens, will further pola- rize the left and the right, not least the factions within the Labor Party, where a bitter debate has been raging behind the scenes for some months over establishing direct contacts with the PLO. In a wider sense, it will have the effect of deepening Israel's diplomatic isolation still further within the in- ternational community. If Arafat had intended to weaken Israel diplomatically and isolate it from its friends — thus making it more vulnerable to superpower pres- sures — he has probably scored a significant victory. This point was not lost on Israel, which mounted a major public relations campaign in an at- tempt to limit the damage. But simply crying foul whenever Arafat makes a statement, however conciliatory, and not offering any THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS 25