100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

December 11, 1987 - Image 68

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Detroit Jewish News, 1987-12-11

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

I NEWS 1

ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA

announces the

1988 ZOA-IvIASADA SUMMER STUDENT
PROGRAMS IN ISRAEL

America's No. 1 Summer Program for Youth

9 Different Programs for Students ages 13 to 21
including:
Teenage Camp, Leadership Training, Student Tour, College
Seminar, Summer in Moshav, Kibbutz Program,
Trailblazers Program, Maccabi Institute for Sports, Masada
Institute for Water Sports
Scholarships for Deserving Applicants.

For colorful brochure phone 569-1515
METRO DETROIT ZOA, 18451 West 10 Mile, Southfield, MI 48075

your advertising dollars do better in

THE JEWISH NEWS

Call Us Today! 354-6060

SPITZER'

Of

Harvard
Row

Spitzer's, Celebrating 40 Years In Business
THE LARGEST HEBREW BOOKSHOP IN THE MIDWEST

Your Headquarters for all your Chanukah needs

Electric Plastic

ALL

MENORAH
with bulbs

CHANUKAH
MENORAHS
20% OFF

Super
Special

Reg.
$995

SPECIAL
PRICE

$ 13 95

We carry over thirty-five
different styles of Menorahs
to choose from.
I
J

.

FREE

Star Of David nay

with any purchase of $9.95 or more

SPITZER

68

FRIDAY. DECEMBER

Hebrew Book & Gift Center

11 Mile and Lahser, Southfield
Harvard Row Mall

356-6080

OPEN ALL DAY SUNDAY

High Interest Rate
Hurts Israel Economy

JAMES D. BESSER

Washington Correspondent

T

he big story in town
may be the Reagan-
Gorbachev summit,
but another issue crucial to
Israel is generating a strong
undertow of controversy on
Capitol Hill.
The issue is the restructur-
ing of Israel's massive debt to
the United States, and a good
deal of the controversy re-
volves around Rep. David
Obey (D-WI), the powerful
chairman of the Foreign
Operations Subcommittee of
the House Appropriations
Committee. Pro-Israel leaders
here consider Obey a major
obstacle to congressional
plans to provide some relief
for the Israeli economy.
A secret meeting in New
York recently, held at Obey's
request in an attempt to tame
the controversy swirling
around the issue, ended
inconclusively.
The debt issue involves
some $11 billion owed by
Israel to the United States
Treasury. This money, mostly
borrowed during the heyday
of sky-high interest rates, was
borrowed under the Foreign
Military Sales (FMS) loans
program.
Now, in a significantly dif-
ferent economic climate, the
burden of a massive, high-
interet foreign debt threat-
ens to choke the fragile Israel
economy.
But the idea of restructur-
ing Israel's debt to the United
States is caught up in a web
of controversy. Two years ago,
Sen. Robert Kasten (R-WI)
and Daniel Inouye (D-HI) pro-
posed a buydown of Israel's
high interest rate, a plan kill-
ed in committee by Sen.
Lawton Chiles (D-FL) on
budgetary grounds.
The idea was resurrected
last year, but it died in the
face of Administration opposi-
tion. The Administration
came up with its own plan —
.which was rejected by pro-
Israel activists as unrealistic
for a cash-poor country like
Israel.
This is where the issue be-
comes truly complex. Rep.
Obey, who opposed the initial
debt plan in Congress, also
opposed the Administration
scheme—on the grounds that
such a plan should be legis-
lated, not just handed down
by the executive branch.
But Obey also continued to
oppose plans in Congress to
provide debt relief. Although
Obey's office repeatedly de-

clined to comment on the en-
tire affair, there were
numerous reports that the
congressman maintained
that debt relief would tarnish
Israel's image, cause prob-
lems for the U.S. Treasury
and complicate relations with
other nations.
Underlying this position,
according to some pro-Israel
activists, is the Congress-
man's general hostility to
foreign aid programs There is
also talk that Obey fears the
election-year windfall to the
federal treasury which would
result from proposed restruc-
turing plans, an influx of cash
that would work to the advan-
tage of the Republicans.
"It is a very difficult issue,
because it's difficult to assess
how a measure like this will
impact the budget and the
deficit," said a Capitol Hill
aide involved in the budget
process. This staffer insisted
that Obey's objections to debt
restructuring are based only
on budget considerations.
"He's been very consistent on
matters of the budget. If
Israel wasn't part of this
whole question, I don't think
there'd be any question about
opposing debt restructuring
of this type."
Obey's supporters also ar-
gue that the refinanced debt
could pose additional long-
term problems for Israel,
since the loans will be made
with a floating interest rate,
the same as an adjustable
rate mortgage. Under this ar-
rangement, if interest rates
soar, Israel could find itself in
even more economic difficulty.
In an effort to shore up his
support within the Jewish
community, Obey requested a
meeting with leading Jewish
figures in New York. A meet-
ing was held at the offices of
Morris Abram, president of
the Conference of Presidents
of Major American Jewish
Organizations, at which Obey
and his staff made his case
against debt restructuring —
and against the perception
that this position was based
on hostility to the needs of
Israel.
According to several re-
ports, the Jewish leaders re-
mained unimpressed.
In the meantime, the
Kasten-Inouye proposal,
which would provide debt
relief by allowing Israel to
refinance much of its high-
interest debt through private
lenders, with the U.S. govern-
ment acting as a guarantor,
advanced last week as part of
the Senate's continuing res-
olution. But the bill will end

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan