- FENBY STEIN Talent Agency 553-9966 WE HAVE THE RIGHT ENTERTAINMENT FOR YOUR PARTY AND YOUR BUDGET BANDS - DJ's CEREMONY MUSIC - COCKTAIL MUSIC SAVE TIME! SEE OUR BANDS ON VIDEO have learned to alter a bacteria that occurs naturally in temperate regions. In its natural state, the bacteria facilitates the formation of frost. In its altered form, the genetic instructions in the bacteria cells are changed to eliminate that property. Scientists are excited by the potential for limiting crop damage by widespread spray- ing of this new organism. Rifkin is not excited about the prospect of frost-free strawberries. Instead, he frets about the social genies that may be let out of the bottle when we begin to think in terms of "perfecting" life? Will we be able to stop with strawberries? Or, will the pro- cess move on to corn and cows — and, maybe, people? What happens to our moral foundation, Rifkin seems to be asking, when we assume powers that were previously limited to God? Is this science? Or is it moral arrogance? "If," he said, "you develop a technology based on engineering design principles — and that's what genetic engineering is about — the final playout of those prin- ciples is perfection. No engineer wants to Rifkin covets new ideas the way some people covet new cars. make his machine only 30 percent perfect. Or 40 percent perfect. Every engineer is concerned with making his machine perfect. If you apply these standards to life, you shouldn't be surprised if you end up with a society defined by those stand- ards." Rifkin is offended by the notion of pa- tenting life forms, a procedure his group has been fighting in the courts. "By allow- ing the patenting of life forms," he said, "the U.S. Patent Office has reduced all animals to the lowly status of commod- ities, indistinguishable from electric toasters." How, Rifkin asked, is this scientific reductionism different from the inhumani- ty of a Hitler, who treated millions of human beings as subhuman, and whose ul- timate objective was a genetically pure, "improved" race of people? lb Rifkin, science and society's ongoing conflict is in a transitional phase. "On one side," he said, "you have a growing respect for life — all life. On the other, you have a final fulfillment of the world view of the Enlightenment — which reduces all life to utilitarianism, expediency, and efficiency by actually engineering those features in- to the genetic code." lb a considerable extent, Rifkin's moral stance makes him attractive to constituen- cies that would not normally be caught dead on the same side of an issue. Funda- mentalist Christians and "evolutionists," religious Jews, devotees of various back-to- the-land philosophies and environmen- talists all find something attractive in Rifkin's opposition to tampering with the genetic code. Rifkin understands that his popularity with some evangelical Christians taints his crusade in the eyes of others, especially in- tellectuals and Jews. He defends this by citing the considerable theological diversi- ty within the Christian community. "You get what you expect out of people," he said. "If you expect a whole constituen- cy to act and think in a certain way, and give them no opportunity to exercise their theology in any other way than the way you've granted them, they will eventually turn inward and do what you expect:' But Rifkin has difficulty addressing fundamentalists' tendency to oppose all knowledge that conflicts with their theology. Although he pointed to several "progressive" groups of evangelicals, he conceded they may not represent most evangelicals. Rifkin's battle to redefine science is curiously divided. On one hand, he fights biotechnology with lawsuits and media- wise actions that have made him such a nuisance to the corporate and scientific world. At the same time, his books and speech are filled with an endless theoriz- ing that sometimes veers into hyperbole. Ask him a question, for example, about what should be done about surrogate mothers who want to keep their children, and you get a breathless lecture on the evolution of the idea of life as a commodi- ty. Rifkin's analysis is based more on history and politics than on science. If a new technology has the potential to be misused, it will, he suggested, be misused. Like many of his fundamentalist admirers, he seems to deeply distrust human nature and is quite certain that science will not provide our redemption. With some prodding, Rifkin revealed that he doesn't expect an abrupt overturn of science's world-view. "What I hope to do," he said, "is slow down the pace at which we accept these things. People -just need to have some of the moral implica- tions of these new ideas pointed out to them. We don't have time to ask these questions because we're bombarded by so much new information, and things move at such a fast clip. "We need to create a responsible, courageous way of critiquing this world view. We need to critique it in a way that allows us to exercise new options for the mind. We might be able to develop a whole different type of consciousness in which there is no place for split atoms and spliced genes. There might be whole different realities out there that we haven't discovered because we were busy splitting atoms and splicing genes. We won't know unless we try." ONE CARAT DIAMONDS Large Selection Priced From 1500°° rs„, David Wachler t S effieffem , SINCE 1922 Downtown Birmingham 540-4622 Renaissance Center, Detroit 259-6922 Certified Gemologist Distinctively designed furniture limited only by your imagination Finely crafted custom furniture especially designed for your unique lifestyle at affordable prices. Professional design services. No obligation in home /office estimates. Call for appointment. Laminations Limited 40400 W. Grand River, Novi, MI 476-13119 ❑ THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS , 49_