THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS 2 Friday, July 9, 1982 Purely Commentary The Multiplying Anxieties: The Score Cards Vis-a-vis the Casualties and the Exaggerations A new chapter commences for the Middle East and in Arab-Israel relations. A new approach to a hoped-for peace may become possible. There may never be single- mindedness, but with the most menacing threat to Israel's existence greatly reduced, the opportunity grows for an invitation to negotiating processes acceptable to all. A month of warfare offered many lessons stemming from multiple contrasts. There were many Jews in the midst of the protesters against the war. There were many non-Jews who applauded the processing procedures lead- ing to the defeat of the PLO and the Syrians. The casualties were heartrending. The civilian losses were deplorable. When the complete story is related, the exaggerations will be exposed, the truth will be recorded, guilt will be ascer- tained and innuendos exposed. Only the ultimate will count in the long run. Only the attainment of peace and the acquisitions of long-delayed amity will be historically commendable. * * * Because Israel is the victor in the current battles, the accumulated reasons for initiating a war are forgotten in many quarters — also among Jews. President Ronald Re- agan did not overlook them. Now it becomes necessary to look at the record, to examine the issues all over again, to study the propaganda techniques of the enemies of Israel as well as their saber- rattling and the war-mongering which included the funds derived by PLO from Saudi Arabia and other Arab sources, the military supplies from the Soviet Union aimed at as- sisting those seeking Israel's destruction. The Jewish defenders of the PLO, like the head of the Central Conference of American Rabbis who, crediting him with the claim that he spoke for himself, even wants "un- conditional" Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon. Therefore, these apologists for the terrorists must be reminded of the build-up of armies and hate-maneuvered propaganda aimed at destroying the Jewish state. Also — it is necessary to take into consideration the manner in which the machine aimed at Israel's destruction has been maneuvered while building up the accusatory that Israel is creating a genocide against Arab refugees. It is in schools, financed with U.S. dollars provided for the UN agencies, and in what have been touted as refugee camps, that armies have been trained to seek a demise for Israel. This is the manner in which UN installations were used in Lebanon as armed camps in the anti-Israel prepara- tions which were disclosed in the New York Times last week. According to a ranking Israeli official who asked not to be identified: "UNRWA allowed schools to be used as ter- rorist bases" and that in certain refugee camps administered by the relief agency, shelters and schools were used as huge arms depots. At the Ein Khilwan camp near Sidon, for example: "Above there was a UN flag, below a fortress. This places all activity of UNRWA in question." The institution near Sidon, which the army has been showing to reporters, is called the Siblin Technical and Teacher Training Institute. It con- sists of modern, attractive buildings on a well- manicured campus several miles from the coast. A plaque shows that it was built in October 1963 and was funded by Sweden. "It is dedicated to the training of young Palestinian refugees in the fields of education and industry," the plaque reads. Not far from the inscription is a room contain- ing crates of rockets and boxes of rifle ammuni- tion. "Across from the library is a dormitory strewn with military uniforms apparently left by stu- dents who fled in haste as the Israeli armored columns advanced three weeks ago. * * * It should be recorded, in the best interests of documen- tations, that the press in this country in the main per- formed its duties admirably in news gathering about the events in Lebanon which may prove historic. The New York Times, in the collective form of reports from Beirut, Jerusalem, Washington, Cairo and other centers will be a necessity for the many books certain to be written about Israel's task of interrupting the PLO-Syrian threats to her existence. Use of the term "interrupting" is deliberate, because it may be impossible presently totally to eradicate the PLO. This will be possible when the Israeli offer of autonomy to Arabs in the Judea and Samaria districts are accepted, the offer fulfilled, the Arab-Israel partnership in good relationships and neighborliness assured. There is another aspect to the media angle in the pre- sent conflict: that of the feature articles and commentaries. Peter E. Goldman, director of Americans for a Safe Israel, called attention to the discrepancies in a letter to the NYTimes in which he pointed out: `Judging Israel' in All Its Aspects, With an Urgency That Prejudging Be Eliminated, That Truth Predominate, That the Documentary Assert the Duty to Assure Arab-Israel Amity Since the beginning of the Israeli action in Lebanon on June 5, 22 articles on the subject have appeared on th Op-Ed page (through June 24). Two have supported Israel (William Safire and Norman Podhoretz), three have been pollyannish and illogical (Flora Lewis), while 17 have opposed the Israeli action or otherwise attacked Israel or Israeli policy. These include: Anthony Lewis (7), Walid Khalidi, Edward Said, Nadav Safran, James Reston (2), Stanley Hoffmann, Bernard Av- ishai, Harold Saunders, Edward Tanner, Fouad Ajami. These figures should disturb those who value balance and debate. It is, naturally, impossible to answer all 20 articles in this letter, but there are two themes running through most of them: • Israel, by attacking the PLO in Lebanon has made the chances for peace more remote, and is to blame for the bloodshed that has resulted. Thus, readers are exposed to multiple repetitions of the classical line that the victim, by not dying peace- ably but fighting back against the aggressor, is the responsible party. It is as if the writers have completely forgotten that Syria and the PLO are at war with Israel, a war which began many years ago wit the aim of wiping Israel off the map. The so-called "moder- ate"Arab states are also at war with Israel and no less committed to its destruction. The latest fight- ing is merely another round of this war, with Is striking back at the aggressors. Any other nation would be universally cheered and urged on to complete victory. But a double standard is applied to Israel, led by Anthony Lewis's emotional diatribes, divorced from Mid- dle East realty. To be consistent, the anti-invasion columnists should condemn the Normandy inva- sion which resulted in huge loss of life. • The second theme pervading these articles is that the creation of a Palestinian state on the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) is the key to peace and harmony in the region. Nonsense! This facile argument ignores the underlying reality of the Arab-Israeli conflict: the Arab- Moslem world will not permit the existence of a non-Arab, non -Moslem state or autonomous region in the area from the Mediterranean Sea to the Persian Gulf. Not only Jews, but Kurds and Christians in Lebanon and elsewhere are victims of this doc- trine. There rarely passes a week without a PLO leader declaring that a Palestinian mini-state in the West Bank would be only the first step toward the destruction of Israel. Goldman's analyses needed to be indicated, especially in an expose of the type of essays which elevated Anthony Lewis to a role of chief defender of the enemies of Israel. It would be sheer folly to deny that Lewis often deals with truth, but in the combination of his conclusions and his derivations of the ugliest in treating Israel he is destruct- ive, he underlines realities and the totality of his writings has been half-truth. With added emphasis on the need to present all sides of the issue, not to ignore the condemnations of Israel, a plat- form must be given the NYTimes for one of its important editorials in which the newspaper advises proper treat- ment of Israel, and at the same time makes damaging accusations. Let both facets be treated equally in giving a platform to the editorial, "Judging Israel," from the NYTimes of July 1: Israel is, or should be morally "divverent" from other nations. So say the critics of its pre-emptive war against the PLO in Lebanon, in which un- counted civilians have died. Because Israel was born of the world's revulsion over Hitler's genocide, the critics note, they hold it to a higher code, even in war. Some of these critics are Is- raelis, struggling to show how morally different they are from their Arab enemies. Are the critics right? Their case is initially compelling because of the way the war unfolded. The Begin government, having reneged on its promises of "full au- tonomy" for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, lied at the start when it said it wanted only a 25-mile cordon sanitaire. Subsequently, it has probably lied about, or at least suppressed, the civilian casualties it has caused. Throughout it has been less than honest — cer- tainly unwise — in confusing the PLO with all Palestinian aspirations. And it has seemed obvi- ous almost from the start that the slaughter in Lebanon was clearly disproportionate to any im- mediate PLO threat. But even after grating all that, there is an- other side. Critics of the civilian bloodshed in Lebanon now fail to remember the much-greater By Philip Slomovitz slaughter of civilians by which the PLO and Syria took over the country. But remaining indifferent until the Israeli intervention, the world has erected a cynical double standard. That does not excuse Israel from the obligation to relate ends to means, but it surely explains why most Israelis now scorn the opinion of mankind. If - the world wishes to counsel the Israelis, let alone give them moral lectures on why they must adhere to a higher standard, then let the judging be fair: Why is it wrong for Israel to threaten tens o thousands in West Beirut to get at a few thousand--- remaining PLO fighters — but not wrong for those fighters to hide in civilian neighborhoods, using innocent people as hostages? As The Economist reported while criticizing Israel's assault on Si- don: "Civilians trying to escape from the camp were shot, apparently by the guerrillas . . . Pales- tinian prisoners the Israelis sent in to plead for the civilians to be freed are also said to have been shot." Why is it wrong for Israel to fight to restore once-friendly Christian power in Lebanon — but not wrong for the PLC and Syria, with Arab League sanction, brutally to have destroyed that power? Why was it wrong of Israel to let the PLO grow strong enough to make all of Lebanon its base — but not wrong for Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia to support that buildup on someone else's terri- tory and at Israel's expense? Why is it wrong, woefully wrong, for Israel to ignore the aspirations of Palestinians who lost their roots to Zionism — but not wrong for other Arab nations to exploit the dispersed refugees while refusing for decades to partition the old Palestine? Why, in short, should Israel be held to higher stanc Ards of moral conduct when most Arab states still deny it even the lowest attributes of nationhood: safe borders and legitimacy? Why should Israelis believe that what the PLO was allowed to do to Lebanon was not also its program for Israel? Such brutal warfare requires more justification than Israel has so far provided. It needs to answer some hard questions. Even a less-embattled na- tion would feel obliged to follow so costly a triumph with a plausible, generous program for co-existence. Nonetheless, by fair standards, if it will finally accept the responsibility of its might, Israel deserves understanding for its plight. "Lying," becomes treacherous in any discussion, yet there are exaggerations which assume that aspect in human and political relations. The truth will surely emerge out of the morass of a conflict that is so enormous that it involves survival. Be- cause there is the urgency of survival, judging Israel is the obligation to be fair and honorable. The NYTimes con- cludes in decency and in a call for justice. This is what it is all about: an obligation to justice. There must be an approach to a solution of the so-called Palestinian problem v ■ Thich must end in neighborliness. Indeed, there may be an approach to decency out of the horror that has been pinned on Lebanon. Judging Israel and Lebanon must be with an elimination of falsified pre- judging. That's the duty of the hour. An Interesting Sabbath: Inspiring Travel to Israel Emergency- appeals to aid Israel's recovery from the economic pressures resulting from a brutal conflict is not only anticipated. Israel Bond sales are already in progress. On the philanthropic scale, a major campaign is cer- tain to be launched by the United Jewish Appeal, the chief beneficiary of the Detroit Allied Jewish Campaign. (-- Equally important is the touring industry, and i Israel. Tourist Sabbath scheduled on a national observance basis for this weekend should be judged appreciatively. The Lebanese warfare, like the previous conflicts in which Israel was engaged, did not disrupt Israel-Diaspora relations. There was, and there continues to be, a signific- ant element, in non-Jewish.as well as the Jewish ranks, deeply interested in Israel. Now there is an even greater need for such intimacy with the land and people of Israel. History beckons to the land at all times, and the importance of the events sur- rounding Israel fascinates and inspires all who have a desire to trace events of the past, to link them with the present, to see for themselves how an embattled nation flourishes and creates significantly, scientifically, cultur- ally, socially, for the benefit of mankind. It's a tribute to a people and to its friends that war is not predominant: that the aim is for peace and humanism, that tourists are invited to share in the glory of creativity. c